Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Diversity of Deviance: How It Can Hurt (and Help) Families and Family Firms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Heterogeneity among Family Firms

Abstract

Dysfunctional and deviant behavior may have different antecedents and effects based on diversity of the family system and the family firm. This chapter describes deviant behavior at varying levels of analysis and discusses how deviance can diminish, as well as enhance, family firm functioning and performance. Utilizing multiple theories of family science, we develop a framework contrasting and classifying different types of deviance as dysfunctional, functional, and strategic and apply these types to family firms. We also examine the impact of culture, familial imprinting, and differences among families to address when deviant behavior is likely to result in positive or negative implications for the family firm. We then suggest avenues for future research that examine the potential for deviant behavior to improve or detract from family firm performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational misbehaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, A. (1956). In H. L. Ansbacher & R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.), The individual psychology of Alfred Adler: A systemic presentation in selections from his writings. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacallao, M. L., & Smokowski, P. R. (2007). The costs of getting ahead: Mexican family system changes after immigration. Family Relations, 56, 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75(1), 43–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B., & Segal, L. (1982). Family systems theory: Background and implications. Journal of Communication, 32, 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 856–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J. A., & Dark, F. H. (1987). The choice of organizational form: The case of franchising. Journal of Financial Economics, 18, 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process: Basics of family systems theory. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2005). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values model. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirico, F., Ireland, R. D., & Sirmon, D. G. (2011). Franchising and the family firm: Creating unique sources of advantage through “familiness”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(3), 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Kellermanns, F. W., & Chang, E. P. (2007). Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately-held family firms. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1030–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. T., Kidwell, R. E., & Eddleston, K. A. (2013). Boss and parent, employee and child: Work-family roles and deviant behavior in the family firm. Family Relations, 62, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, C. D. (1993). Is rugged individualism the whole story? Public and private accounts of a firm’s founding. Family Business Review, 6, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crom, S., & Bertels, T. (1999). Change leadership: The virtues of deviance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20(3), 162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S. M. (2014). The future of family business research through the family scientist’s lens. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, & P. Sharma (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business (pp. 611–619). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S. M., Loy, J. T.-C., & Stafford, K. (2008a). Business planning practices of family-owned firms within a quality framework. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S. M., Lee, J., Stafford, K., & Heck, R. K. Z. (2008b). The effects of ethnicity, families and culture on entrepreneurial experience: An extension of sustainable family business theory. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 13, 229–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S. M., Lee, J., Amarapurkar, S., Stafford, K., & Haynes, G. W. (2009). Determinants of family business resilience after a natural disaster by gender of business owner. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 14, 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Allen, M. R., & Hayes, H. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 34(6), 1093–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dencker, J. C., Gruber, M., & Shah, S. K. (2009). Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organization Science, 20, 516–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distelberg, B. J., & Blow, A. (2011). Variations in family system boundaries. Family Business Review, 24, 28–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, E. M. (1962). Family development (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, K. A., & Kidwell, R. E. (2012a). Parent-child relationships: Planting the seeds of deviant behavior in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36(2), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, K., & Kidwell, R. E. (2012b). The bad seed’s poisonous harvest: How offspring sow and reap deviant and dysfunctional behavior in the family business. In A. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Eds.), Understanding family businesses: Undiscovered approaches, unique perspectives and neglected topics (pp. 95–114). New York: Springer International Entrepreneurship Series.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., & Kidwell, R. E. (2017). Managing family members: How control and collaboration affect extra role behavior in family firms. Human Resource Management.https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21825.

  • Egas, M., & Riedl, A. (2008). The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1637), 871–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, M. (1990). Radical dissent and learning in human systems. Consultation, 9(2), 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family. Human Communication Research, 20, 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galperin, B. L. (2003). Can workplace deviance be constructive? In A. Sagie, S. Stashevsky, & M. Koslowsky (Eds.), Misbehavior and dysfunctional attitudes in organizations (pp. 154–170). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G., & Nicholson, N. (2008). Family wars: Classic conflicts in family business and how to deal with them. London/Philadelphia: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–52). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. W., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. (2004). The dark side of organizational behavior. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. W., O’Leary-Kelly, A., & Collins, J. M. (1998). Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Violent and deviant behavior. Monographs in organizational behavior and industrial relations (Vol. 23). Stamford: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. Summers, J., & Mennecke, B. (2016). The effects of the dark triad on unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, published online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3368-3.

  • Hoy, F., & Sharma, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial family firms. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A. E., Jennings, J. E., & Breitkreuz, R. S. (2012). Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25, 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz, P., & Dyer, W. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30, 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Balkin, D. B., & Reay, T. (2013). Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., & Rau, S. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J., Shanine, K., & Kacmar, M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 309–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerlander, N., Dessi, C., Bird, M., Floris, M., & Murru, A. (2015). The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multi-case study. Family Business Review, 28, 332–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28, 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R. E., & Nygaard, A. (2011). A strategic deviance perspective on the franchise form of organizing. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35(3), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R. E., Nygaard, A., & Silkoset, R. (2007). Antecedents and effects of free riding in the franchisor-franchisee relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 522–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R. E., Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2012). Harmony, justice, confusion and conflict in the family firm: Implications for ethical climate and the “Fredo effect”. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R. E., Eddleston, K. A., Cater, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2013). How one bad family member can undermine a family firm: Preventing the Fredo effect. Business Horizons, 56(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R. E., Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2018). Learning bad habits across generations: How negative imprints affect human resource management in the family firm. Human Resource Management Reviewhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.002.

  • Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., & Tochman Campbell, J. (2015). You don’t forget your roots: The influence of CEO social class background on strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1614–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Lester, R. H. (2011). Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22, 704–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A., Foo, M. D., & Chaturvedi, S. (2013). Imprinting effects of founding core teams on HR values in new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 37, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., Mainemelis, C., & Kark, R. (2016). Leaders’ responses to creative deviance: Differential effects on subsequent creative deviance and creative performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. (2003). Good definitions: The epistemological foundation of scientific progress. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 415–444). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Schulze, W. S., Ling, Y., & Dino, R. N. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, K., Holt, D. T., Kellermanns, F. W., & Ranft, A. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29, 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35, 558–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 195–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Jaffee, J., & Tortoriello, M. (2012). Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organization Science, 23, 547–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, W., Recker, J., Kummer, T.-F., Kohlborn, T., & Viaene, S. (2016). Constructive deviance as a driver for performance in retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 30, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1996). Home and work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, P. D., Zuiker, V. S., Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., Heck, R. K., & Duncan, K. A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 639–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., Trapnell, P. D., & Chen, D. (1999). Birth order effects on personality and achievement within families. Psychological Science, 10, 482–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. R. (1991). Guilt loops. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 447–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, T. M., Smith, A. D., Kudlats, J., & Astrachan, J. H. (2015). The persistence of multifamily firms: Founder imprinting, simple rules, and monitoring processes. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 39, 1313–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillari, V. (1991). Scapegoating in families: Intergenerational patterns of physical and emotional abuse. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poza, E. J., & Daugherty, M. S. (2014). Family business (4th ed.). Mason: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S. M. (1987). Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 615–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. D., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17, 523–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Bennett, R. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multi-dimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, N. P., Phillips, K. W., & Dumas, T. L. (2005). Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organization Science, 16, 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvato, C., Minichilli, A., & Piccarreta, R. (2011). Faster route to the CEO suite: Nepotism or managerial proficiency? Family Business Review, 25, 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2006). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationship in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 429–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., Fox, B., & Heavey, C. (2015). “What’s past is prologue”: A framework, review, and future directions for organizational research on imprinting. Journal of Management, 41, 228–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2003). Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 207–224). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 828–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, K., Duncan, K. A., Danes, S. M., & Winter, M. (1999). A research model of sustainable family businesses. Family Business Review, 12, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O. (1995). Altruism and the quality of life. American Economic Review (AEA Papers and Proceedings), 79, 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Elmen, J. D., & Mounts, N. S. (1989). Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents. Child Development, 60, 1424–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organization (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1992). On the goals of successful family corporations. Family Business Review, 5, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadera, A. K., Pratt, M. G., & Mishra, P. (2013). Constructive deviance in organizations: Integrating and moving forward. Journal of Management, 39, 1221–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in organizations: Theory, research and management. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y., & Wiener, Y. (1996). Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework. Organization Science, 7, 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 29, 622–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D., Foreman, P., & Dyer, W. G. (2014). Organizational identity and family business. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, & P. Sharma (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business (pp. 480–497). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, G. G., & Constantine, L. L. (1993). Systems theory. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 325–352). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T., Sieger, P., & Halter, F. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Programs, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA

    Roland E. Kidwell, Kevin C. Cox & Kathryn E. Kloepfer

Authors
  1. Roland E. Kidwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin C. Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathryn E. Kloepfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland E. Kidwell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA

    Esra Memili

  2. School of Business Administration, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

    Clay Dibrell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kidwell, R.E., Cox, K.C., Kloepfer, K.E. (2019). The Diversity of Deviance: How It Can Hurt (and Help) Families and Family Firms. In: Memili, E., Dibrell, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Heterogeneity among Family Firms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation