Abstract
The thinking university is evident in two forms: (i) thinking about the world, as structured in the disciplines and (ii) thinking about the university itself as an institution where, for example, a university attempts to steer some kind of direction for itself. Clearly, these two forms of thinking in the university interact. A thesis here is that that interplay is not even-handed but that thinking at level (ii) is dominating thinking at level (i). Thinking in the disciplines - academic thought as such - is constrained and even itself disciplined by the thought given over to the university qua institution. In brief, a university’s mission may influence academic thought as such, even if unwittingly. There is a characteristic rivalry at work here: disciplinary thought is outward looking, concerned to understand the world whereas institutional thought is inward looking, concerned instrumentally to steer the university through turbulent waters. However, this thesis is not the end of the matter. Strangely, the new conditions in which the university finds itself are opening new inducements for the university to think anew about itself and its responsibilities in the world. In turn, new spaces may even open for thinking in the disciplines. Complementarily, work in the disciplines - in all disciplines - can prompt fresh thinking about the university and its possibilities in the world. There are grounds for optimism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adorno, T. (2008). Lectures on negative dialectics. Cambridge: Polity.
Boutang, Y. M. (2011). Cognitive capitalism. Cambridge, UK and Malden: Polity.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2013/1994). What is philosophy? London and New York: Verso.
Habermas, J. (1989). The theory of communicative action: The critique of functionalist reason (Vol Two). Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (1990). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol One). Cambridge: Polity.
Heiddeger, M. (2004). What is called thinking? New York and London: Harper Perennial.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.
List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group Agency: the possibility, design and status of corporate agents. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.
MacIntyre, A. (2009). God, Philosophy, Universities: A Selective History of the Catholic Philosophical Tradition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Maxwell, N. (1984). From knowledge to wisdom: A revolution in the aims & methods of science. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.
Peters, M., Gietzen, G., & Ondercin, D. J. (2012). Knowledge socialism: Intellectual commons and openness in the university. In R. Barnett (Ed.), The future university: Ideas and possibilities. New York and London: Routledge.
Stiegler, B. (2015). States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21 st century. Cambridge, UK and Malden: Polity.
Weber, M. (1991). Science as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From max weber: Essays in sociology. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnett, R. (2018). The Thinking University: Two Versions, Rival and Complementary. In: Bengtsen, S., Barnett, R. (eds) The Thinking University. Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77667-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77667-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77666-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77667-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)