Advertisement

Indices for Ecoacoustics

  • Jérôme Sueur
Part of the Use R! book series (USE R)

Abstract

Ecoacoustics aims at studying acoustic populations, communities, and landscapes for research in ecology. Ecoacoustics uses several acoustic indices to feature outdoor recordings. The main α and β ecoustic indices are reviewed one by one and statistic solutions are provided to treat dissimilarity matrices built with β indices.

Audio files:forest.wavM-XV_20101125_000000.wavM-XV_20101125_010000.wavM-XV_20101125_020000.wavM-XV_20101125_030000.wavM-XV_20101125_040000.wavM-XV_20101125_050000.wavM-XV_20101125_060000.wavM-XV_20101125_070000.wavM-XV_20101125_080000.wavM-XV_20101125_090000.wavM-XV_20101125_100000.wavM-XV_20101125_110000.wavM-XV_20101125_120000.wavM-XV_20101125_130000.wavM-XV_20101125_140000.wavM-XV_20101125_150000.wavM-XV_20101125_160000.wavM-XV_20101125_170000.wavM-XV_20101125_180000.wavM-XV_20101125_190000.wavM-XV_20101125_200000.wavM-XV_20101125_210000.wavM-XV_20101125_220000.wavM-XV_20101125_230000.wav

References

  1. Boelman NT, Asner GP, Hart PJ, Martin RE (2007) Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: bioacoustics, field surveys, and airborne remote sensing. Ecol Appl 17:2137–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cazelles B (2004) Symbolic dynamics for identifying similarity between rhythms of ecological time series. Ecol Lett 7:755–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deecke VB, Janik VM (2006) Automated categorization of bioacoustic signals: avoiding perceptual pitfalls. J Acoust Soc Am 119:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Depraetere M, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Gasc A, Duvail S, Sueur J (2012) Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecol Indic 13:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fuller S, Axel AC, Tucker D, Gage SH (2015) Connecting soundscape to landscape: which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration? Ecol Indic 58:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gasc A, Sueur J, Jiguet F, Devictor V, Grandcolas P, Burrow C, Depraetere M, Pavoine S (2013a) Assessing biodiversity with sound: do acoustic diversity indices reflect phylogenetic and functional diversities of bird communities? Ecol Indic 25:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gasc A, Sueur J, Pavoine S, Pellens R, Grandcolas P (2013b) Biodiversity sampling using a global acoustic approach: contrasting sites with microendemics in new caledonia. PLoS ONE 8:e65311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gasc A, Pavoine S, Lellouch L, Grandcolas P, Sueur J (2015) Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessments: analyses of bias based on simulated bird assemblages and recommendations for field surveys. Biol Conserv 191:306–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Josse J, Pagès J, Husson F (2008) Testing the significance of the RV coefficient. Comput Stat Data Anal 53:82–91MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, Joo W (2012) The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: an archive for studying soundscape ecology. Eco Inform 12:50–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kendrick P, Lopez L, Waddington D, Young R (2016) Assessing the robust of soundscape complexity indices. In: 23rd international congress on sound and vibration, Athens, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  13. Legendre P, Anderson MJ (1999) Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 69:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lellouch L, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Glotin H, Sueur J (2014) Monitoring temporal change of bird communities with dissimilarity acoustic indices. Methods Ecol Evol 5:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Magurran AE, McGill BJ (2011) Biological diversity, frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyer D, Buchta C (2016) proxy: distance and similarity measures. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=proxy, R package
  17. Pieretti N, Farina A, Morri FD (2011) A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community:the acoustic complexity index (ACI). Ecol Indic 11:868–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Robert P, Escoufier Y (1976) A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: the RV- coefficient. J R Stat Soc 25:257–265MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodriguez A, Gasc A, Pavoine S, Grandcolas P, Gaucher P, Sueur J (2014) Temporal and spatial variability of animal sound within a neotropical forest. Eco Inform 21:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sueur J, Farina A (2015) Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. Biosemiotics 26:493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008b) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS ONE 3:e4065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sueur J, Farina A, Gasc A, Pieretti N, Pavoine S (2014) Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acustica United Acustica 100:772–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Towsey M, Wimmer J, Williamson I, Roe P (2014) The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Eco Inform 21:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Villanueva-Rivera L, Pijanowski B, Doucette J, Pekin B (2011) A primer of acoustic analysis for landscape ecologists. Landsc Ecol 26:1233–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérôme Sueur
    • 1
  1. 1.Muséum National d’Histoire naturelleParisFrance

Personalised recommendations