Abstract
Some laws and statutes can be tried out in particular localities and later enacted nationally after the experience has been evaluated and improvements have been made.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Deng (1984a), p. 158.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Lelas (2000), p. 211.
- 5.
Greenwood (1951), p. 8.
- 6.
Ranchordás (2014), pp. 37–38.
- 7.
Ranchordás (2013), p. 415.
- 8.
- 9.
Ranchordás (2013), p. 435.
- 10.
Ranchordás (2013), pp. 435–438.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
Jahrreiß (1953), p. 32.
- 15.
Noll (1973), p. 76.
- 16.
Maaß (2001), p. 29.
- 17.
Stettner (1989), p. 808.
- 18.
Ranchordás (2014), p. 5.
- 19.
Dainow (1966–1967), pp. 424–425.
- 20.
Knoop (2013), p. 50.
- 21.
Zippelius (1991), p. 413.
- 22.
Knoop (2013), p. 50.
- 23.
Sofia Ranchordás warns that legal stability might “stiffen into a rigid legal paradigm impervious to changing social norms and practices”, see Ranchordás (2013), pp. 428–429.
- 24.
Mader (1988), p. 219; Stettner (1989), p. 812. In Germany, the field of education was the first area to be susceptible for experiments which is reflected by one of the first and most well-known examples of experiments at state level, namely the “one-step” qualification of lawyers (einstufige Ausbildung nach § 5b DRiG). In recent decades, experiments can be found particularly in social and unemployment policies, but also in the areas of telecommunication, tax and road traffic. A list of examples is found in Maaß (2001), p. 35; Hoffmann-Riem (1993), p. 57.
- 25.
Ranchordás (2014), p. 10.
- 26.
- 27.
Ye (2012), p. 323; Heilmann (2008a), p. 25. Deng Xiaoping said “practice is the sole criterion for testing truth” (实践是检验真理的唯一标准), believing that only by experimenting with alternative forms of production and entrepreneurial activity would China find the best way for rapid economic growth, see Deng (1984c), p. 229.
- 28.
Chen (1999), p. 43.
- 29.
Heilmann (2008a), p. 28.
- 30.
Ranchordás (2013), pp. 435–438.
- 31.
Chen (1999), pp. 40–41.
- 32.
- 33.
- 34.
Heilmann (2008a), p. 3.
- 35.
- 36.
Mao (1965), p. 117.
- 37.
See in detail Heilmann (2008a), pp. 4–7; Qian and Du (2015), p. 6; Lubman (2014), http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/07/10/power-shift-hopeful-signs-in-chinas-legal-reform-plan/, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 38.
Philion (2009), p. 19.
- 39.
With regard to Mao’s land redistribution policies, see Chang (1951), pp. 550–552.
- 40.
- 41.
Heilmann (2008a), p. 5.
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.
Qian and Du (2015), p. 6.
- 47.
Heilmann (2008a), p. 11.
- 48.
Andreas (2009), p. 269.
- 49.
The transformation of the rural society was part of the process of socialist revolution: Landlord ownership of farmland was replaced with collectivization in rural areas in favor of poor and landless peasants, see in detail Chang (1951), pp. 550–563.
- 50.
The theoretical foundations for the equilibrium between centralism and the independence of local authorities were laid by Mao Zedong in 1956, elaborating on the “two initiatives” (两个积极性). In his opinion, a unified leadership of the central government was needed but not sufficient and efficient enough to attain a socialist modernization. Rather, local authorities were to be strengthened and had to be granted great discretion in regulating economic and commercial affairs, see more closely Mao (1977), pp. 284–307. The “two initiatives” have been incorporated into Article 3 of the Constitution of 1982, see in detail Jiang (2009), http://www.lishiyushehui.cn/modules/topic/detail.php?topic_id=282, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 51.
The first wave of decentralization coincided with the Great Leap Forward (1958–1960). The second wave of decentralization began in 1970 during the Cultural Revolution, see Tang and Linowski (2011), p. 142.
- 52.
Henders (2013), p. 376.
- 53.
- 54.
Chen (1998), p. 1225.
- 55.
Heilmann (2008a), p. 13.
- 56.
Chen (1998), p. 1225.
- 57.
- 58.
- 59.
- 60.
Guo (2013), p. 109.
- 61.
Guo (2013), p. 155.
- 62.
- 63.
Concerning the pragmatism and rationalism characterizing post-Mao leadership, see Guo (2013), pp. 109–111.
- 64.
Zhang and Cai (2010), p. 31.
- 65.
His economic reform in 1978 was not based on extremist ideology; it was the strong aim to revive the significance of the CCP by achieving economic success that would improve the living standards of the Chinese people. This mode of reform is also referred to as “decentralization of power and transfer of benefits” (fangquan rangli 放权让利), see more closely Tsang (1998), p. 1326.
- 66.
Heilmann (2008a), pp. 25–26.
- 67.
Heilmann et al. (2013), p. 900.
- 68.
- 69.
- 70.
Ke (2012), p. 96.
- 71.
Vogel (2011), p. 399.
- 72.
- 73.
An (2015), p. 115.
- 74.
This slogan symbolizing the trial and error approach was first put forth by Chen Yun (陈云), a CCP leader, at a Government Administration Council meeting on April 7, 1950, see more closely Ou (2014), p. 81.
- 75.
Wu and Wen (2012), p. 38.
- 76.
Wu and Wen (2012), pp. 38–39; Huang (2000), p. 67. With regard to policies that are adopted in SEZs and form the basis for learning and thus the broader adoption of the good policies in other territorial regions, Tom Ginsburg speaks of “spatial experimentation of policies”, see Ginsburg (2016), p. 125.
- 77.
- 78.
See Constitution of the CCP—General Program.
- 79.
- 80.
- 81.
- 82.
- 83.
- 84.
- 85.
- 86.
- 87.
Wang (2008), pp. 112–113.
- 88.
Qian and Du (2015), p. 10. Sebastian Heilmann and Barry Naughton emphasize that in case of failed experiments, “political entrepreneurship” may also generate a lot of wasted activities. However, these failed trials while implemented on a small scale do not cause great damage and may even be enriching insofar as they help policy makers understand the underlying socio-economic or financial exigencies, see Heilmann (2008a), p. 1; Naughton (2009), p. 14.
- 89.
Hao (2001), p. 55.
- 90.
Huang and Zheng (2010), pp. 33–34.
- 91.
Huang and Zheng (2010), pp. 33–34. Concerning the range of preferential policies granted to FIEs registered in the SEZ, see for example Articles 12 et seq. of the Regulations on Special Economic Zones in Guangdong Province (广东省经济特区条例) from August 26, 1980.
- 92.
Li (1996), p. 145.
- 93.
See more closely Chen (2009), p. 103.
- 94.
See Hu (2016), p. 141.
- 95.
- 96.
Baissac and Farole (2011), p. 24.
- 97.
- 98.
- 99.
Carter and Harding (2011), p. 3.
- 100.
Muchlinski (2011), p. 16.
- 101.
Muchlinski (2011), p. 16.
- 102.
FIAS – The World Bank (2008), p. 11.
- 103.
Muchlinski (2007), p. 227.
- 104.
Nallathiga (2008), pp. 1–2.
- 105.
Nallathiga (2008), pp. 1–2.
- 106.
Muchlinski (2011), p. 16.
- 107.
Farole and Akinci (2011), p. 3.
- 108.
Wassermann (1976), p. 479.
- 109.
Wassermann (1976), p. 480.
- 110.
With regard to policy objectives, see in detail Farole and Akinci (2011), pp. 3–4.
- 111.
- 112.
Green and Trebilcock (2007), p. 660.
- 113.
Green and Trebilcock (2007), p. 661.
- 114.
Green and Trebilcock (2007), p. 662.
- 115.
Article 3 SCM Agreement.
- 116.
- 117.
Creskoff and Walkenhorst (2009), p. 8.
- 118.
- 119.
Farole and Akinci (2011), p. 6.
- 120.
Wang (2011), p. 93.
- 121.
- 122.
Likosky (2005), p. 81.
- 123.
Likosky (2005), p. 81.
- 124.
Likosky (2005), p. 81.
- 125.
- 126.
Harding (2011), p. 164.
- 127.
Harding (2011), p. 165.
- 128.
Harding (2011), p. 165.
- 129.
Under the principle of national treatment, a foreign firm must be treated no less favorably than domestic firms. The preferential policies granted to foreign investors have been referred to as “super-national treatment”, a term that originates from the Chinese word chao guomin daiyu 超国民待遇, see in detail Wang (2010b), pp. 377–379.
- 130.
Harding (2011), p. 166.
- 131.
Chen (1999), pp. 321–322.
- 132.
Muchlinski (2011), p. 20.
- 133.
Muchlinski (2011), p. 20.
- 134.
Muchlinski (2011), p. 29.
- 135.
Zeng (2015), p. 3.
- 136.
Deng (1994), p. 358.
- 137.
- 138.
- 139.
Chan et al. (1986), p. 89.
- 140.
The Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade (dui wai jingji maoyi bu 对外经济贸易部) was renamed Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM, shangwu bu 商务部) in 2003, see more closely Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (2005), http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/zt_pingxuan/subjectd/200612/20061204031248.shtml, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 141.
Fenwick (1984), p. 378.
- 142.
Fenwick (1984), p. 378.
- 143.
Fenwick (1984), p. 378.
- 144.
Regulations on Special Economic Zones in Guangdong Province (Guangdong Regulations) from 1980 (广东省经济特区条例).
- 145.
- 146.
Chinese Communist Party News (2008), http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/68742/69118/69658/7433454.html, accessed 20 December 2017; Coase and Wang (2012), p. 61.
- 147.
The decision to designate part of Shenzhen, Zhuhai and Shantou cities in Guangdong Province and of Xiamen city in Fujian Province was contained in the July 15, 1979 Approval by the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and the State Council for Distribution of the Two Respective Reports of the Guangdong and Fujian Provincial Party Committees concerning the Adoption of Special Policies and Flexible Measures in External Economic Activities, (中共中央、国务院批转广东省委、福建省委《关于对外经济活动实行特殊政策和灵活措施的两个报告》), see Su (2008), p. 23; Fenwick (1984), p. 376.
- 148.
Yang (1988), http://www.bjreview.com.cn/Cover_Story_Series_2010/2010-02/03/content_244683.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 149.
With regard to Special Administrative Regions, see above, Sect. 2.2.1.
- 150.
van der Hum (1995), p. 55.
- 151.
Chan et al. (1986), p. 92.
- 152.
广东省经济特区条例.
- 153.
Zeng (2015), p. 13. A similar set of regulations was adopted for Xiamen SEZ: On July 14, 1984, at the Eighth Session of the Standing Committee of the Sixth Fujian Provincial People’s Congress, five laws for Xiamen SEZ governing the registration of enterprises, land use, labor management, the import of technology, and the economic association between Xiamen SEZ and inland areas of China were adopted, see also Pow and Moser (1987), p. 205.
- 154.
- 155.
See also Zhong (2011), p. 6.
- 156.
Article 12 of the Guangdong Regulations.
- 157.
Article 14 of the Guangdong Regulations.
- 158.
Article 1 of the Guangdong Regulations.
- 159.
Resolution of Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress Authorizing the People’s Congresses of Guangdong and Fujian Provinces and Their Standing Committees to Formulate Separate Economic Regulations for their Respective Economic Zones (全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于授权广东省、福建省人民代表大会及其常务委员会制定所属经济特区的各项单行经济法规的决议), issued in the 21st meeting of the Standing Committee of the Fifth National People’s Congress on November 26, 1981.
- 160.
Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Authorizing the People’s Congress of Shenzhen City and its Standing Committee and the People’s Government of Shenzhen City to Formulate Regulations and Rules Respectively for Implementation in the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone (全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于授权深圳市人民代表大会及其常务委员会和深圳市人民政府分别制定法规和规章在深圳经济特区实施的决定), issued in the 26th meeting of the Standing Committee of the Seventh National People’s Congress on July 1, 1992. The legislative authorities of Xiamen municipality (March 22, 1994), Shantou municipality and Zhuhai municipality (March 17, 1996) were also given the right to formulate regulations and rules for the respective zones, see more closely Kay and Bunnell (2004), p. I-8.12.
- 161.
See also Zimmerman (2010), p. 65.
- 162.
Wang (2011), p. 96.
- 163.
Pow and Moser (1987), pp. 211–212.
- 164.
- 165.
- 166.
Luo and Yin (2012), p. 75.
- 167.
- 168.
Luo and Yin (2012), p. 75.
- 169.
Yeung et al. (2009), p. 224.
- 170.
- 171.
Shang (2008), p. 86.
- 172.
- 173.
Enterprise Income Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国企业所得税法), adopted on March 16, 2007, effective as of January 1, 2008, amended in 2017.
- 174.
Wu (2007), p. 4.
- 175.
For a definition of “national treatment”, see Herdegen (2013), p. 55.
- 176.
See in general Muchlinski (2011), p. 21.
- 177.
Xu and Schiwow (2006), p. 331.
- 178.
Wu (2007), p. 4.
- 179.
Tan and Huang (2013), p. 51; interview with Ding Mingfang (丁明方), Shenzhen Legal Affairs Institute, July 9, 2014.
- 180.
- 181.
- 182.
Interview with Ye Haibo (叶海波) and Xiao Youxian (肖又贤), Faculty of Law, Shenzhen University, July 10, 2014.
- 183.
Wei and Vanhullebusch (2015), p. 334.
- 184.
- 185.
- 186.
Tan and Huang (2013), p. 50.
- 187.
See also No VII 1 of The Outline of the Plan for the Reform and Development of the Pearl River Delta (2008–2020) (珠江三角洲地区改革发展规划纲要), adopted by the National Development and Reform Commission in December 2008. Under No VII 1 the Plan states that “Shenzhen will continue to play its role as the window of the special economic zones, as experimental field and as demonstration area (…)”.
- 188.
Wuttke (2012), pp. 109–110.
- 189.
- 190.
Teets and Hurst (2015), p. 8.
- 191.
Zhang and Cai (2010), p. 33.
- 192.
- 193.
- 194.
- 195.
Pearson (1991), p. 53.
- 196.
Pearson (1991), p. 53.
- 197.
- 198.
Fenwick (1984), p. 381.
- 199.
Brown (2004), pp. 1–2.
- 200.
For a more detailed list of major types of experimental zones, see Heilmann (2008b), p. 8.
- 201.
国家级经济技术开发区 (state-level ETDZ). Development zones approved by the State Council are referred to as “state-level” zones. As of 2015, the total of state-level ETDZs has added up to 219, see Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (2015), http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/xglj/kaifaqu.shtml, accessed 20 December 2017. However, it is remarkable, that in addition to state-level or national zones, also provincial governments have approved development zones, so-called provincial-level zones. In fact, there are about thousands of industrial parks sponsored by provincial and municipal governments, see Sahling (2008), p. 8.
- 202.
技术产业开发区.
- 203.
保税区. Bonded zones provide for duty-free entry of goods that can be stored, manufactured, re-packaged, merchandised or displayed and re-exported without customs duty and import value-added tax (VAT) payment, see Paling et al. (2012), p. 32.
- 204.
Cf. Kay and Bunnell (2004), p. I-8.2.
- 205.
国务院关于支持深圳前海香港现代服务业合作区开发开放有关政策的批复.
- 206.
In June 27, 2012, the official Reply of the State Council on the Relevant Policies Supporting the Development and Opening-up of the Qianhai Shenzhen-Hong Kong Modern Service Cooperation Zone of Shenzhen was released in order to achieve a collaborative relationship between the two adjacent cities of Shenzhen and Hong Kong, see more closely Yeung (2015), p. 17.
- 207.
Central People’s Government (2017), http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-04/01/content_5182824.htm, accessed 19 December 2017.
- 208.
Yeung (2015), p. 19. It allows Hong Kong banks to lend RMB directly to companies in Qianhai. For this, the People’s Bank of China published the Provisional Rules for Cross-border RMB lending in Qianhai (前海跨境人民币贷款管理暂行办法) in December 2012.
- 209.
Interview with Xie Tian (谢天), Qianhai, July 11, 2014; Chen (2013), http://www.scmp.com/business/banking-finance/article/1321674/qianhai-bypassed-firms-head-shanghai-free-trade-zone, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 210.
Central People’s Government (2017), http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-04/01/content_5182824.htm, accessed 19 December 2017.
- 211.
Xiong’an will primarily host non-capital functions from Beijing, and some administrative and public institutions, higher education institutions and financial institutions will be transferred to the new area, see Beijing Review (2017), http://www.bjreview.com/Nation/201704/t20170425_800094640.html, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 212.
Beijing Review (2017), http://www.bjreview.com/Nation/201704/t20170425_800094640.html, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 213.
Sometimes, the term ‘SEZ’ wrongly includes Export Processing Zones (chukou jiagong qu 出口加工区) and other variants of zones, see Ahrens and Meyer-Baudeck (1995), pp. 89–90. It should also be noted that China’s typology of development zones differs from that of ILO.
- 214.
中国(上海)自由贸易试验区.
- 215.
- 216.
For more details, see Riccardi (2016), p. 63.
- 217.
Wu (2015), http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2015-04/21/content_20492742.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 218.
- 219.
With regard to the general objectives of Shanghai FTZ, see more closely section I (2) of the Framework Plan for China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (中国(上海)自由贸易试验区总体方案), approved by the State Council on September 18, 2013; Yan and Wang (2016), p. 193.
- 220.
Collins (2014), p. 171.
- 221.
The Decision was adopted at the Fourth Session of the Standing Committee of the Twelfth National People’s Congress on August 30, 2013 (全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于授权国务院在中国(上海)自由贸易试验区暂时调整有关法律规定的行政审批的决定).
- 222.
- 223.
Hu (2016), p. 145.
- 224.
Hu (2016), pp. 129–140.
- 225.
Interview with Xiao Jun (肖军), School of Law, Wuhan University, July 7, 2014.
- 226.
Decision of the NPCSC on Amending Four Laws including the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprises (全国人大常委会高票通过了关于修 改《外资企业法》 等 4 部法律的决定). According to the Decision, certain provisions of the EJV Law, the CJV Law, the WFOE Law and the Law on Protection of the Taiwanese Investment in Mainland China are amended with effect from October 1, 2016, see more closely People’s Daily Online (2016), http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2016-09/05/nw.D110000renmrb_20160905_5-04.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 227.
The revised Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (外商投资产业指导目录(2017年修订)) came into force on July 28, 2017.
- 228.
See more closely Wu and Luo (2017), https://www.chinalawinsight.com/2017/08/articles/corporate/what-will-become-of-foreign-investment-in-china-under-the-new-record-filing-system/, accessed 20 December 2017. Generally, the Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment is divided into three categories consisting of (1) “encouraged”, (2) “restricted” and (3) “prohibited” industry sectors. The revised Catalogue from 2017, for the first time, has only two categories, referring to the restricted and prohibited categories collectively as a negative list.
- 229.
Wu and Luo (2017), https://www.chinalawinsight.com/2017/08/articles/corporate/what-will-become-of-foreign-investment-in-china-under-the-new-record-filing-system/, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 230.
Deng (1984a), p. 158.
- 231.
- 232.
- 233.
For a thorough analysis of experimental legislation from a comparative perspective, see Ranchordás (2014).
- 234.
Ranchordás (2013), p. 419.
- 235.
See introduction to this chapter.
- 236.
Ranchordás (2015c), p. 135.
- 237.
Deng (1984a), p. 158.
- 238.
Bi (2015), p. 151.
- 239.
- 240.
- 241.
An (2015), p. 113.
- 242.
- 243.
Wang (2010a), p. 67.
- 244.
Bi (2015), p. 142.
- 245.
Bi (2015), p. 149.
- 246.
- 247.
Wu and Wen (2012), p. 42.
- 248.
See, for example, the Regulation of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone on the Promotion of Gender Equity (深圳经济特区性别平等促进条例), passed by the Standing Committee of Shenzhen Municipality on June 28, 2012, effective as of January 1, 2013. This law is the first of its kind to ensure gender equality and yet, there are no enforcement mechanisms, see Sohu (2015), http://roll.sohu.com/20150327/n410385618.shtml, accessed 21 December 2017; Bi (2015), p. 142.
- 249.
van Rooij (2006), p. 48.
- 250.
The World Bank (2016), http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 251.
Cheng (2015), http://www.shekebao.com.cn/shekebao/n440/n441/u1ai8731.html, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 252.
Wu’s statement can be found in China Daily Europe (2011), http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-03/10/content_12149185.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 253.
Xinhuanet (2017), http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/19cpcnc/2017-10/27/c_1121867529.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 254.
Xi Jinping aims at fulfilling the “China Dream”, that is, achieving a prosperous and strong country. Yet, as Xi Jinping pointed out at the 19th National Congress of the CCP, the “China Dream” would be “no walk in the park”: “It will take more than drum beating and gong clanging to get there”. He also said, China now embraces the brilliant prospects of rejuvenation, moving closer to centre stage and making greater contributions to mankind, see Phillips (2017), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/18/xi-jinping-speech-new-era-chinese-power-party-congress, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 255.
- 256.
Schulz (2012), http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/putting-the-plan-into-action-how-china-s-leaders-steer-a-massive-nation-a-843593-3.html, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 257.
With regard to the multilevel legislative system, see above, Sect. 2.2.1.2.
- 258.
- 259.
- 260.
Heilmann (2008c), p. 3.
- 261.
Schulz (2012), http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/putting-the-plan-into-action-how-china-s-leaders-steer-a-massive-nation-a-843593-3.html, accessed 20 December 2017; Heilmann (2008b), p. 4.
- 262.
Heilmann (2008c), p. 3.
- 263.
Gröpl (2015), pp. 114–115.
- 264.
Heilmann (2008c), p. 3. In German law, legal certainty is described as one of the pillars of a rule-of-law-state (Rechtsstaat). Continuity of legislation refers to the citizens’ legitimate expectation that law endures and does not change spontaneously and arbitrarily. Furthermore, law has to be predictable, that is, the citizens have to be able to foresee the consequences resulting from their conduct, see Ranchordás (2015b), pp. 36–37.
- 265.
Ranchordás (2013), p. 439.
- 266.
Heilmann (2008c), pp. 3–4.
- 267.
Wang (2015a), p. 7.
- 268.
- 269.
Heilmann (2008c), pp. 3–4.
- 270.
Wang (2015b), pp. 7–8.
- 271.
- 272.
Epstein (1993), p. 222.
- 273.
Wang (2015b), p. 9.
- 274.
James (2000), p. 28.
- 275.
Yu (1989), p. 49.
- 276.
Yu (1989), pp. 39–40.
- 277.
Delisle (2011), p. 150.
- 278.
- 279.
Hu Shih (1891–1962) has played a leading role in introducing pragmatism into the Chinese intellectual arena. He was highly influential in the New Culture Movement (新文化运动) of the mid 1910s and 1920s that was directed against the bondage of classic culture of Confucianism. Hu Shih advocated a pragmatic evolutionary change arguing that the Chinese should shift from abstract theories to experimenting with new ideas to find solutions to problems. Hu Shih invited John Dewey, his former teacher, to China in 1919. Dewey’s pragmatist philosophy sparked great enthusiasm for the pragmatic approach in China’s political debate. In the 1950s, Chinese Marxists denounced Hu Shih as a promoter of bourgeois pragmatism. For more details, see Chan (1956), pp. 3–12; Yu (1989), pp. 34–35. With regard to Dewey’s lectures in China, see Feinberg (1975), pp. 365–369; Huang (2014), p. 21. It was during the Reform and Opening Up Policy that the pragmatic, experimentalist approach has again come to the forefront.
- 280.
James (2000), p. 27.
- 281.
Kunzmann et al. (2001), p. 173.
- 282.
According to James, only the pragmatist tells the story of the truth process: By evaluating one’s own experiences, one is able to determine what is “true”, see Cormier (2001), p. 40.
- 283.
See more closely James (2000), p. 25; Posner (1990), p. 1663. Posner argues that pragmatism constitutes an antidote of formalism: In contrast to pragmatism which seeks to examine the relation of concepts to the world of fact, formalism remains anti-empirical; see also Sullivan and Solove (2003), pp. 688–689.
- 284.
- 285.
Fogarty (2012), p. 1.
- 286.
Fogarty (2012), p. 2.
- 287.
For a discussion on legal pragmatism, see Patterson (1940), pp. 172–204; Butler (2002), https://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=eip, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 288.
Falcón Y Tella (2011), p. 49.
- 289.
Butler (2002), https://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=eip, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 290.
- 291.
Posner (1990), p. 1657.
- 292.
Posner (1990), p. 1657.
- 293.
Butler (2002), https://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=eip, accessed 20 December 2017; Sullivan and Solove (2003), p. 693.
- 294.
Ranchordás (2013), p. 428.
- 295.
- 296.
Ranchordás (2015a), p. 201.
- 297.
Hu and Mao (2013), http://english.qstheory.cn/magazine/201301/201302/t20130219_211853.htm, accessed 26 December 2017.
- 298.
The Chinese word for “pragmatism” is shiyong zhuyi 实用主义. However, Chinese scholars when analyzing the core themes of the lectures delivered by the American philosopher John Dewey, translated “pragmatism” into shiyan zhuyi 实验主义, a term that in a literal translation means “experimentalism”, see Gu (2000), p. 105; Heilmann (2008a), p. 18.
- 299.
Chen (1999), p. 43.
- 300.
With regard to the ‘piecemeal’ approach towards law-making advocated by Deng Xioaping, see Chen (1999), pp. 42–43.
- 301.
See Hu and Mao (2013), http://english.qstheory.cn/magazine/201301/201302/t20130219_211853.htm, accessed 28 December 2017; Yu (1989), pp. 38–39.
- 302.
- 303.
- 304.
- 305.
Yu (1989), p. 40.
- 306.
Guo (2013), pp. 101–102.
- 307.
Blasek (2015), p. 13.
- 308.
Yu (1989), p. 41.
- 309.
Yu (1989), p. 41.
- 310.
Yu (1989), p. 41.
- 311.
Guo (2013), p. 185.
- 312.
Shen (2000), p. 25.
- 313.
- 314.
- 315.
Shen (2000), p. 25.
- 316.
Immanuel Kant was even willing to sacrifice the world for the sake of law: “fiat iustitia, pereat mundus” (Let justice reign even if all the rascals should perish from it), see more closely Depenheuer (2014), p. 561. Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde states that law—from the perspective of the historical school developed by Friedrich Carl von Savigny—is understood as an independent construction of the intellectual-cultural world (“ein selbständiges Gebilde der geistig-kulturellen Welt”), see Böckenförde (1976), p. 16.
- 317.
- 318.
- 319.
See above, Sect. 2.2.2.3.
- 320.
Liebman (2011), pp. 169–170.
- 321.
Liebman (2011), p. 167.
- 322.
Bi (2015), p. 162.
- 323.
Shen (2000), pp. 27–28.
- 324.
- 325.
- 326.
Yu (1989), p. 42.
- 327.
Yu (1989), p. 42.
- 328.
Hu Angang and Mao Jie explain how Mao Zedong defined the approach of seeking truth from facts: ““facts” refer to all things that exist objectively in the world, “truth” refers to the intrinsic links that exist between objective things, or in other words, objective laws; and “seeking” refers to the act of identifying these laws through the process of study.”, see Hu and Mao (2013), http://english.qstheory.cn/magazine/201301/201302/t20130219_211853.htm, accessed 27 December 2017.
- 329.
- 330.
Hu and Mao (2013), http://english.qstheory.cn/magazine/201301/201302/t20130219_211853.htm, accessed 27 December 2017.
- 331.
- 332.
Yu (1989), p. 45.
- 333.
Rui (1983–1984), p. 61.
- 334.
Chen (1999), p. 42.
- 335.
Qin (2005), pp. 44–45.
- 336.
- 337.
Hu and Mao (2013), http://english.qstheory.cn/magazine/201301/201302/t20130219_211853.htm, accessed 27 December 2017.
- 338.
As indicated above in this chapter under Sect. 3.3.2.
- 339.
深圳经济特区改革创新促进条例.
- 340.
See more closely Creemers (2014), https://chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/official-central-committee-communique-on-4th-plenum/, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 341.
- 342.
Article 6 of the Legislation Law 2000 only states that the law “shall be made by proceeding from reality”.
- 343.
Heilmann (2009), p. 455.
- 344.
- 345.
Yu (1989), p. 42.
- 346.
This alludes to the phenomenon of the so-called “benign unconstitutionality” (liangxing weixian良性违宪) as discussed in Sect. 6.3.1.
- 347.
Chen (2015a), p. 231.
- 348.
The statistics can be found in Bi (2015), p. 147. The statistics Bi Yanying produced in the chart in her essay derive from Peking University Law School’s Chinalawinfo database, at: http://www.pkulaw.cn/. It includes all laws, regulations and rules ranging from 1949 to 2015, April 1, including effective, expired and invalid ones. The statistics only comprise legislative norms that include an explicit sign of experimental legislation in their names, such as “temporary”, “for trial implementation” or “pilot implementation”.
- 349.
For example, on September 13, 1979, the Environmental Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China, For Trial Implementation (中华人民共和国环境保护法 (试行)) was enacted which was in effect for 10 years. The Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People’s Republic of China from 1986 (中华人民共和国企业破产法 (试行)) was also enacted on a trial basis and has become ineffective only in 2006 when “the time was ripe” to enact the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (企业破产法).
- 350.
See above, Sect. 2.2.3.3.
- 351.
Bi (2015), p. 146.
- 352.
Bi (2015), p. 146.
- 353.
See also An (2015), p. 113.
- 354.
Bi (2015), p. 146.
- 355.
Heilmann (2008b), p. 5.
- 356.
Articles 9, 56 (3) of the Legislation Law 2000/Articles 9, 65 (3) of the Legislation Law 2015, see above, Sect. 2.2.3.2.
- 357.
- 358.
An (2015), p. 117.
- 359.
Li (1996), p. 145.
- 360.
An (2015), pp. 117–118.
- 361.
- 362.
Qin Qianhong describes the “legislation in advance” (先行立法) as a typical case of experimental legislation, see Qin (2005), p. 43.
- 363.
See Sect. 2.2.3.3.4.
- 364.
Zou (2006), p. 92.
- 365.
Zou (2006), p. 91.
- 366.
- 367.
See above, Sect. 3.2.2.2.
- 368.
- 369.
- 370.
Yuan et al. (2010), pp. 66–72.
- 371.
Xinhua (2017), http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-01/23/c_136007205.htm, accessed 27 December 2017. Shenzhen is on the verge of surpassing Hong Kong’s economy that has averaged an annual growth rate of only about 3%, see Lam (2017), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-05/as-shenzhen-overshadows-hong-kong-the-ex-colony-keeps-its-jewel, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 372.
- 373.
- 374.
- 375.
- 376.
Yang (2004), p. 6.
- 377.
The Regulations of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone on Land Management (深圳经济特区土地管理条例), adopted by the Standing Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s Congress on December 29, 1987 and promulgated on January 3, 1988 by the Guangdong Provincial People’s Congress, recognized land as an economic asset and set a first example of land commercialization. Concerning their conflict with the Constitution, see Sects. 5.1.1.1 and 6.3.1.1; see also Yu (2011), p. 120.
- 378.
The sole proprietorship investment pattern represented a challenge to the planned economy that was still hesitant to allow foreign influence. Yet, the WFOE was a permissible form of investment in the zones (manifest in Article 1 of the Guangdong Regulations). It was not until 1986 that the Law on Foreign-Capital Enterprises (中华人民共和国外资企业法) (WFOE Law) became effective.
- 379.
Heilmann (2008b), p. 8.
- 380.
Heilmann (2008b), pp. 3–4.
- 381.
Li and Otto (2002), p. 24.
- 382.
Chen (2009), pp. 102–103.
- 383.
- 384.
Zhang (1995a), p. 13.
- 385.
- 386.
- 387.
See above, Sect. 3.2.2.3.
- 388.
- 389.
China Daily Europe (2013), http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-08/24/content_16918183.htm, accessed 20 December 2017. During the 19th National Congress of the CCP in October 2017, Xi Jinping defended China’s practice of creating more experimental FTZs, see Xinhuanet (2017), http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/19cpcnc/2017-10/27/c_1121867529.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 390.
See supra note 221.
- 391.
According to the Decision, the approval items as provided in Articles 6, 10, 20 of the WFOE Law, in Articles 2, 13, 14 of the EJV-Law and in Articles 5, 7, 10, 12 (2), 24 of the CJV-Law have been suspended.
- 392.
See above in this chapter under Sect. 3.2.2.6.
- 393.
Xinhuanet (2015), http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-03/24/c_134093934.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 394.
This Decision was adopted by the NPCSC on December 28, 2014 (全国人大常委会关于授权国务院在中国(广东)自由贸易试验区、中国(天津)自由贸易试验区、中国(福建)自由贸易试验区以及中国(上海)自由贸易试验区扩展区域暂时调整有关法律规定的行政审批的决定).
- 395.
Smeenk et al. (2017), http://www.mondaq.com/china/x/613578/Inward+Foreign+Investment/ Chinas+Free+Trade+Zones+Overview+Of+2017+Developments, accessed 10 December 2017.
- 396.
Xinhuanet (2015), http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-03/24/c_134093934.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 397.
- 398.
See Chap. 2, supra note 182.
- 399.
This is manifest in Article 11 of the Legislation Law. See also Li (2017), p. 90.
- 400.
According to Article 4 clause 2 of the Ordinance concerning the Procedures for the Formulation of Administrative Regulations (行政法规制定程序条例), issued by the State Council and in force since January 1, 2002, the administrative regulations made through authorization of the NPC and its Standing Committee shall be named “interim regulations” (暂行条例) or “interim provisions” (暂行规定). Article 9 of the Legislation Law 2000 as well as Legislation Law 2015 allows the NPC and the NPCSC to authorize the State Council to pass administrative regulations on the matters exclusively falling under the jurisdiction of the NPC and the NPCSC (specified in Article 8).
- 401.
For instance, the Provisional Regulations on the Administrative Punishment for Speculation and Profiteering (投机倒把行政处罚暂行条例) issued in 1987 by the State Council have become invalid in 2008. The provisions were incompatible with social practices and reality, see more closely Decision of the State Council on Abolishing some Administrative Regulations (国务院关于废止部分行政法规的决定), issued in 2008. The Provisional Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Private Enterprises (中华人民共和国私营企业暂行条例) have been promulgated by the State Council on June 25, 1988 and were in effect until recently.
- 402.
The clear indication of an expiration date in advance is an essential requirement for ensuring the constitutionality of experimental legislation, see more closely Ranchordás (2014), p. 87.
- 403.
Keller (1994), p. 735.
- 404.
- 405.
- 406.
- 407.
Article 10 (2) of the Legislation Law 2015. The deadline restriction cannot apply to existing experimental legislation due to the doctrine of non-retroactivity, see Bi (2015), p. 151.
- 408.
Article 10 (3) of the Legislation Law 2015.
- 409.
E.g. Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Authorizing the State Council to Temporarily Adjust Certain Administrative Approval Items Prescribed in Laws in Guangdong Province (全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于授权国务院在广东省暂时调整部分法律规定的行政审批的决定), adopted on December 28, 2012; Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Authorizing the State Council to Temporarily Adjust the Relevant Administrative Approval Items Prescribed in Laws in China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, adopted on August 30, 2013 (see supra note 221); Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Authorizing the State Council to Temporarily Adjust the Relevant Administrative Approval Items Prescribed in Laws in China (Guangdong) Pilot Free Trade Zone, China (Tianjin) Pilot Free Trade Zone, China (Fujian) Pilot Free Trade Zone, and the Extensions of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, adopted on December 28, 2014 (see supra note 394); Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Authorizing the State Council to Temporarily Adjust the Implementation of the Provisions of Relevant Laws in the Administrative Regions of Daxing District of Beijing Municipality and Other 33 Pilot Counties (全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于授权国务院在北京市大兴区等三十三个试点县(市、区)行政区域暂时调整实施有关法律规定的决定), adopted on February 27, 2015; Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress to Temporarily Adjust the Implementation of the Provisions of Relevant Laws in the Administrative Regions of Daxing District of Beijing Municipality and other 232 Pilot Counties (Cities and Districts) and Jixian County of Tianjin Municipality and other 59 Pilot Counties (Cities and Districts), adopted on December 27, 2015 (全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于授权国务院在北京市大兴区等 232 个试点县 (市、区)、天津市蓟县等59个试点县(市、区)行政区域分别暂时调整实施有关法律规定的决定); see in detail Wu and Li (2015), pp. 77–78.
- 410.
Qian Ningfeng differentiates this new design of empowerment decision that has come to the fore since 2006 from the general, broadly worded, rather unstructured empowerment decisions prevailing in the 1980s and 1990s, see Qian (2015), p. 56.
- 411.
- 412.
Kischel (2015), pp. 756–757.
- 413.
Keith and Lin (2009), p. 224.
- 414.
Article 67 No 4 of the Constitution.
- 415.
Resolution of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress Providing an Improved Interpretation of the Law (全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于加强法律解释工作的决议), adopted on June 10, 1981.
- 416.
- 417.
Wang (2006), p. 528. For instance, despite the lack of laws and regulations governing stock exchanges in 1992, Shenzhen courts accepted the cases on disputes over stock exchanges occurring in Shenzhen and adjudicated according to the principles of seeking truth from facts, equality and reasonableness which national legislation later could draw upon, see Wang (2006), p. 546. Wang also quotes News report by People’s Daily, Dec. 22, 1992.
- 418.
Wang (2006), p. 528.
- 419.
Wang (2006), p. 541.
- 420.
- 421.
Keith and Lin (2009), pp. 229–230. They emphasize that the expanding role of judicial interpretation has become highly controversial since it encroaches upon legislative powers.
- 422.
全国人大常委会关于授权最高人民法院,最高人民检察院在部分地区开展刑事案件速裁程序试点工作的决定, adopted on June 27, 2014. Article 13 of the Legislation Law 2015 serves as a legal basis for this kind of empowerment decision, see Wu and Li (2015), pp. 77–78.
- 423.
全国人大常委会关于授权最高人民法院、最高人民检察院在部分地区开展刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的决定, adopted on September 3, 2016; see also Xinhua (2016), http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-09/03/c_135656720.htm, accessed 20 December 2017.
- 424.
Heilmann (2008b), p. 7.
- 425.
An (2015), p. 117.
- 426.
In general Heilmann (2008b), p. 7; Lubman (2014), http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/07/10/power-shift-hopeful-signs-in-chinas-legal-reform-plan/, accessed 20 December 2017; Li (2015), p. 118. Li Ben Sen also states that by means of these pilot programs which constitute the framework of experimental legislation in criminal procedure, domestic as well as international experiences should be incorporated in the testing process.
- 427.
After the modification of the Legislation Law 2015: Article 73 (2).
- 428.
With regard to the functions of “local legislation in advance” see above, Sect. 2.2.3.3.4.
- 429.
- 430.
- 431.
- 432.
- 433.
Ke (2012), p. 96.
- 434.
Ke (2012), p. 96.
- 435.
- 436.
- 437.
Article 73 (2) of the Legislation Law 2015.
- 438.
Heilmann (2008a), p. 2.
- 439.
- 440.
See above, Sect. 2.2.3.3.2.
- 441.
Yin (2015), http://www.bjreview.com.cn/quotes/txt/2015-06/04/content_680341_3.htm, accessed 22 December 2017.
- 442.
- 443.
Heilmann (2009), p. 453.
References
Ahl B (2015) Zur Revision des Gesetzgebungsgesetzes der Volksrepublik China. ZChinR 22(3):241–251
Ahrens J, Meyer-Baudeck A (1995) Special Economic Zones: shortcut or roundabout way towards capitalism. Intereconomics 30(2):87–95
An C (安晨曦) (2015) Experimental legislation and categorization between experience and norm – a proposal from legislative perspective (在经验与规范之间:试验立法及其类型化、一种立法进路的提倡). Theory of Law Frontier (理论法前沿) (3):112–123
Andreas J (2009) Rise of the red engineers: the cultural revolution and the origins of China’s new class. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Baissac C, Farole T (2011) Brief history of SEZs and overview of policy debates. In: Farole T (ed) Special Economic Zones in Africa: comparing performance and learning from global experience. World Bank Publications, Washington DC, pp 23–60
Beijing Review (2017) Birth of a New City: the planning of the Xiongan New Area. http://www.bjreview.com/Nation/201704/t20170425_800094640.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Bell DA (2015) The China model: political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Bi Y (2015) Experimentalist approach of Chinese legislation model: from passive response to institutional design. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 3(2):141–167
Blasek K (2015) Rule of law in China: a comparative approach. Springer, New York
Böckenförde E (1976) Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit: Studien zu Staatstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main
Brown A (2004) Introduction. In: Brown A (ed) The demise of Marxism-Leninism in Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 1–18
Butler BE (2002) Legal Pragmatism: Banal or Beneficial as a Jurisprudential Position?. https://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=eip. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Carter C (2011) A tale of two Chinese SEZs: from exogenous to sustainable endogenous growth? In: Carter C, Harding A (eds) Special Economic Zones in Asian market economies. Routledge, London, pp 54–83
Carter C, Harding A (2011) SEZs: policy incubators or catalysts for development? In: Carter C, Harding A (eds) Special Economic Zones in Asian market economies. Routledge, London, pp 1–14
Central People’s Government (中华人民共和国中央人民政府) (2017) The Central committee of the CCP and the State Council decide to establish Hebei-Xiong’an New Area (中共中央、国务院决定设立河北雄安新区). http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-04/01/content_5182824.htm. Accessed 19 Dec 2017
Chan W-T (1956) Hu Shih and Chinese Philosophy. Philosophy East and West 6(1):3–12
Chan T, Chen E, Chin S (1986) China’s Special Economic Zones: ideology, policy and practice. In: Jao Y, Leung C (eds) China’s Special Economic Zones: policies, problems and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 87–104
Chang C (1951) Mao’s stratagem of land reform. Foreign Affairs 29:550–563
Chen S (1988) A review of thirty years of legal studies in New China. Journal of Chinese Law 2(1):181–200
Chen G (沈关成) (1996) Rethinking local legislative power (论地方立法权的再认识). China Legal Science (中国法学) (1):17–22
Chen K (1998) Administrative decentralization and changing state-society relations in China. Int’l J. of Pub. Admin. 21(9):1223–1255
Chen J (1999) Chinese law – towards an understanding of Chinese law, its nature and development. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague
Chen J (2009) Modernisation, westernisation, and globalisation: legal transplant in China. In: Oliveira J, Cardinal P (eds) One country, two systems, three legal orders – perspectives of evolution. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–114
Chen G (2013) Qianhai bypassed as firms head for Shanghai Free-trade zone: new free-trade zone attracts ventures planned for Shenzhen base, raising concern in HK. http://www.scmp.com/business/banking-finance/article/1321674/qianhai-bypassed-firms-head-shanghai-free-trade-zone. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Chen J (2015a) Chinese law – context and transformation: revised and expanded edition. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden
Chen J (2015b) The transformation of Chinese law: Mark II. HKLJ 45(Part 3):911–939
Chen J (陈家喜), Huang W (黄卫平) (2010) The political change of Shenzhen Special Economic Zones in China (1980–2010) (深圳经济特区的政治发展(1980–2010)). The Commercial Press (商务印书馆出版), Beijing
Cheng X (程雪阳) (2015) The logic of China’s reform from experimental points to legislation (从试点到立法的中国改革逻辑). http://www.shekebao.com.cn/shekebao/n440/n441/u1ai8731.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
China Daily Europe (2011) Socialist system of laws established in China. http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-03/10/content_12149185.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
China Daily Europe (2013) Shanghai FTZ signals further reform, opening up. http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-08/24/content_16918183.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Chinese Communist Party News (中国共产党新闻) (2008) Inside information of piloting SEZ policy decision - why Guangdong and Fujian went ahead (试办经济特区的决策内情 为何广东、福建先走一步). http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/68742/69118/69658/7433454.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Coase R, Wang N (2012) How China became capitalist. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Collins D (2014) National treatment in emerging market investment treaties. In: Sanders KA (ed) The principle of national treatment in international economic law: trade, investment and intellectual property. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Massachusetts, pp 161–182
Cormier H (2001) The truth is what works: William James, pragmatism and the seed of death. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham
Corne PH (2002) Creation and application of law in the PRC. Am. J. Comp. L. 50:369–444
Corne PH (2008) Chapter 5 – creation and application of law. In: Moser MJ, Yu F (eds) Doing business in China, 2008, vol 1. Juris Publishing, Huntington, pp I-5.1–I-5.92
Crane GT (1994) ‘Special things in special ways’: national economic identity and China’s Special Economic Zones. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 32:71–92
Creemers R (2014) China Copyright and Media: Official Central Committee Communiqué on 4th Plenum. https://chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/official-central-committee-communique-on-4th-plenum/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Creskoff S, Walkenhorst P (2009) Implications of WTO disciplines for Special Economic Zones in developing countries. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4089/WPS4892.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Dainow J (1966–1967) The civil law and the common law: some points of comparison. Am. J. Comp. L. 15(3):419–435
Delisle J (2011) Law and the China development model. In: Hsu SP, Wu Y-S, Zhao S (eds) In search of China’s development model: beyond the Beijing consensus. Routledge, London, pp 147–165
Deng X (1984a) Emancipate the mind, seek truth from facts and unite as one in looking to the future – December 13, 1978. In: Selected works of Deng Xiaoping, 1975–1982, vol II. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, pp 151–165
Deng X (1984b) Mao Zedong thought must be correctly understood as an integral whole - July 21, 1977. In: Selected works of Deng Xiaoping, 1975–1982, vol II. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, pp 55–60
Deng X (1984c) The present situation and the tasks before us - January 16, 1980. In: Selected works of Deng Xiaoping, 1975–1982, vol II. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, pp 224–258
Deng X (1994) Excerpts from talks given in Wuchang, Shenzhen, Zhuhai and Shanghai; January 18 - February 21, 1992. In: Selected works of Deng Xiaoping, 1982–1992, vol III. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, pp 358–370
Depenheuer O (2014) Vorbehalt des Möglichen. In: Isensee J, Kirchhof P (eds) Handbuch des Staatsrechts: Bd. XII, Normativität und Schutz der Verfassung, 3rd edn. C.F. Müller, Heidelberg, pp 557–589
Di Tommaso MR, Rubini L, Barbieri E (2013) Southern China - industry development and industrial policy. Routledge, London
Eger T, Schueller M (2007) A comparison of Chinese and European-style federalism from a law and economics perspective. In: Eger T, Faure M, Naigen Z (eds) Economic analysis of law in China. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 3–28
Epstein EJ (1993) Instrumental and ideological forms of law: implications for China’s transplants of Hong Kong Law. In: Wacks R (ed) Hong Kong, China and 1997: essays in legal theory. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 211–228
Falcón Y, Tella MJ (2011) Case law in Roman, Anglosaxon and Continental law. Brill, Leiden
Fan X-z (2015) On the active adaptation legislation of Guangdong Province in the reform and opening-up process (广东省改革开放中主动适应性立法研究). Ph.D thesis, Wuhan University (武汉大学)
Farole T, Akinci G (2011) Introduction. In: Farole T, Akinci G (eds) Special Economic Zones: progress, emerging challenges, and future directions. World Bank Publications, Washington DC, pp 1–21
Feinberg W (1975) Robert Clopton and Tsuin-Chen Ou, John Dewey - Lectures in China. “1919-1920” (Book Review). Philosophy East and West 25(3):365–369
Fenwick A (1984) Evaluating China’s Special Economic Zones. Int’l Tax & Bus. Law. 2(2):376–397
FIAS – The World Bank (2008) Special Economic Zones: performance, lessons learned, and implications for zone development. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/343901468330977533/pdf/458690WP0Box331s0April200801PUBLIC1.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Fogarty S (2012) William James’s pragmatism: the practical value of personal truth and liberation from truth. VURJ 8:1–7
Gao G, Long GQ (1996) Special Economic Zones (SEZ) and Economic and Technological Development Zones (ETDZ) in China. In: Gupta S (ed) China’s economic reforms: role of Special Economic Zones and economic and technological development zones. Allied Publishers Limited, New Delhi, pp 129–168
Ginsburg T (2016) Special Economic Zones: a constitutional political economy perspective. In: Basedow J, Kono T (eds) Special Economic Zones. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 119–130
Gopalakrishnan S (2011) SEZs in India: an economic policy or a political intervention? In: Carter C, Harding A (eds) Special Economic Zones in Asian market economies. Routledge, London, pp 139–155
Green A, Trebilcock M (2007) Enforcing WTO obligations: what can we learn from export subsidies. JIEL 10(3):653–683
Greenwood E (1951) Experimental sociology: a study in method, 6th edn. King’s Crown Press, New York
Gröpl C (2015) Staatsrecht I: Staatsgrundlagen, Staatsorganisation, Verfassungsprozess, 7th edn. C.H.Beck, München
Gu H (顾红亮) (2000) The misreading of pragmatism: the influence of Dewey’s philosophy on modern chinese philosophy (实用主义的误读:杜威哲学对中国现代哲学的影响). Shanghai East China Normal University Publishing House (上海华东师范大学出版社), Shanghai
Guo S (2013) Chinese politics and government: power, ideology, and organization. Routledge, London
Hao L (郝丽雅) (2001) The status of regulations of Special Economic Zones and their application in administrative trials (特区法规的位阶及其在行政审判中的适用). Administrative Law Review (行政法学研究) (1):50–56
Harding A (2011) The Indian Special Economic Zones act 2005: implications for modelling the law and governance of SEZs. In: Carter C, Harding A (eds) Special Economic Zones in Asian market economies. Routledge, London, pp 156–171
He P (2014) Chinese lawmaking: from non-communicative to communicative. Springer, Heidelberg
Heilmann S (2004) Das politische System der Volksrepublik China, 2nd edn. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Heilmann S (2008a) From local experiments to national policy: the origins of China’s distinctive policy process. The China Journal 59:1–30
Heilmann S (2008b) Policy experimentation in China’s economic rise. St Comp Int Dev 43(1):1–26
Heilmann S (2008c) Experimentation under hierarchy: policy experiments in the reorganization of China’s State Sector, 1978–2008: CID Working Paper No. 172. https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/cid/cidwp/pdf/172.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Heilmann S (2009) Maximum tinkering under uncertainty: unorthodox lessons from China. Modern China 35(4):450–462
Heilmann S, Shih L, Hofem A (2013) National planning and local technology zones: experimental governance in China’s Torch programme. The China Quarterly 216:896–919
Henders SJ (2013) Assessing hybridity in the People’s Republic of China: the impact of post-Mao decentralization. In: Loughlin J, Kincaid J, Swenden W (eds) Routledge handbook of regionalism and federalism. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 371–385
Herdegen M (2013) Principles of international economic law, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hoffmann-Riem W (1993) Experimentelle Gesetzgebung. In: Becker B, Bull HP, Seewald O (eds) Festschrift für Werner Thieme zum 70. Geburtstag. Heymann, Köln, pp 55–69
Hu J (2016) A small difference in wording, but a big difference in rule-making: a retrospective and prospective view on the development of China’s economic zones. In: Hu J, Vanhullebusch M, Harding A (eds) Finance, rule of law and development in Asia: perspectives from Singapore, Hong Kong and Mainland China. Brill, Leiden, pp 137–167
Hu A, Mao J (2013) Seeking truth from facts: the secret to the success of China’s policy-making. http://english.qstheory.cn/magazine/201301/201302/t20130219_211853.htm. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
Huang X (黄秀兰) (2000) On policy experimentation during the process of reform and opening up (论改革开放进程中的政策试验). Probe (探索) (3):66–69
Huang J (黄進) (2012a) To enable the legislative power of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone to play a greater role – in commemoration of the 20th Anniversary of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone being granted legislative power (讓深圳經濟特區立法權發揮更大的作用——纪念深圳經濟特區獲授立法權 20 周年). China Law (中国法律) (4):6–7
Huang Z (黄喆) (2012b) On the achievements, deficiencies and improvements of legislation in Shenzhen Special Economic Zone (论深圳经济特区立法的成果、不足及完善). Journal of Jianghan University (Social Science Edition) (江汉大学学报(社会科学版)) 29(5):99–102
Huang Q (黄启祥) (2014) Spread and influence of pragmatism (实用主义哲学的传播与影响): adoption and development of American pragmatism in Chinese education circles (中国教育思想界对美国实用主义的引介与发展). People’s Tribune (人民论坛) (23):20–24
Huang W (黄卫平), Zheng C (郑超) (2010) The political significance of the establishment and development of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone (深圳经济特区建立与发展的政治意义). Theoretical Horizon (理论视野) (5):33–37
Huang S (黄曙海), Zhu W (朱维究) (1986) On delegated legislation (试论授权立法). Chinese Journal of Law (法学研究) (1):7–13
Jahrreiß H (1953) Größe und Not der Gesetzgebung. Schünemann, Bremen
James W (2000) Lecture II - what pragmatism means. In: Gunn G (ed) William James - pragmatism and other writings. Penguin, New York, pp 24–40
Jiang S (强世功) (2009) Written and unwritten constitutions: a new approach to the study of constitutional Government in China (中国宪法中的不成文的宪法: 理解中国宪法的新视角). http://www.lishiyushehui.cn/modules/topic/detail.php?topic_id=282. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Kay DB, Bunnell BA (2004) Chapter 8 – preferential zones. In: Moser MJ, Yu F (eds) Doing business in China, 1999, vol 1. Juris Publishing, Huntington, pp I-8.1–I-8.28
Ke G (柯刚) (2012) Research on “local legislation in advance” (地方先行立法研究). Chinese Journal of Law (法学研究) (9):96–97
Keith RC, Lin Z (2009) Judicial interpretation of China’s Supreme People’s Court as “Secondary Law” with special reference to criminal law. China Information 23(2):223–256
Keith RC, Lin Z, Hou S (2014) China’s Supreme Court. Routledge, London
Keller P (1994) Sources of order in Chinese law. Am. J. Comp. L. 42(4):711–759
Kischel U (2015) Rechtsvergleichung. C.H.Beck, München
Knoop TA (2013) Global finance in emerging market economies. Routledge, London
Kumar A (2002) Research methodology in social science. Sarup & Sons, New Delhi
Kung K-SJ (1985) The origins and performances of China’s Special Economic Zones. Asian Journal of Public Administration 7(2):198–215
Kunzmann P, Burkard F, Wiedmann F (2001) dtv-Atlas Philosophie, 9th edn. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München
Lam E (2017) Hong Kong’s economy may soon be eclipsed by the Chinese city next door. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-05/as-shenzhen-overshadows-hong-kong-the-ex-colony-keeps-its-jewel. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Lelas S (2000) Science and modernity: toward an integral theory of science. Springer, Dordrecht
Lenin VI (1973) Report on concessions at a meeting of the Communist group of the all-Russia central council of trade unions, April 11, 1921. In: Lenin - collected works, vol 32. Progress Publishers, Moscow, pp 300–315
Li H (1996) Development of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone. In: North East Asia Economic Forum – Hawaii Asia-Pacific Institute (ed) Regional economic cooperation in northeast asia: proceedings of the sixth meeting of the Northeast Asia Economic forum, pp 145–149
Li Y (2000) The law-making law: a solution to the problems in the Chinese legislative system? HKLJ 30:120–140
Li BS (李本森) (2015) A research study on fast-track sentencing procedure in criminal cases considering the American and German fast-track procedure in criminal cases (我国刑事案件速裁程序研究——与美、德刑事案件快速审理程序之比较). Global Law Review (环球法律评论) (2):111–124
Li J (黎娟) (2017) Theoretical construction and empirical analysis of “Experimental Legislation” - Focusing on Article 13 of “Legislation Law” in China (“试验性立法”的理论建构与实证分析———以我国《立法法》第13 条为中心). Political Science and Law (政治与法律) (7):84–94
Li Y, Otto J (2002) Central and local law-making: studying China’s experience. In: D’Hooghe I, Vermeer EB (eds) China’s legal reforms and their political limits. RoutledgeCurzon, London, pp 1–32
Lieberthal K (2004) Governing China: from revolution through reform, 2nd edn. W. W. Norton & Company, New York
Liebman BL (2011) A return to populist legality? Historical legacies and legal reform. In: Heilmann S, Perry EJ (eds) Mao’s invisible hand: the political foundations of adaptive governance in China. Harvard University Asia Center, Cambridge, pp 165–200
Likosky MB (2005) The silicon empire: law, culture and commerce. Ashgate, Aldershot
Lindner JF (2007) Experimentelle Rechtsetzung durch Rechtsverordnung - Am Beispiel des Hochschulrechts. DÖV (23):1003–1009
Lubman S (2006) Looking for law in China. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 20(1):1–92
Lubman S (2014) Power shift: hopeful signs in China’s legal reform plan. http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/07/10/power-shift-hopeful-signs-in-chinas-legal-reform-plan/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Luo QH (罗清和), Yin HJ (尹华杰) (2012) Special Economic Zones and the China model (经济特区与中国模式). Journal of Shenzhen University (深圳大学学报) 29(3):72–76
Maaß V (2001) Experimentierklauseln für die Verwaltung und ihre verfassungsrechtlichen Grenzen: Zugleich ein Beitrag zu § 7a BerlHG. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin
Mader L (1988) Experimentelle Gesetzgebung. In: Grimm D, Maihofer W (eds) Gesetzgebungstheorie und Rechtspolitik. Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen, pp 211–221
Mah JS (2008) Foreign direct investment inflows and economic development: the case of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone in China. JWIT 9(4):319–331
Mao T-T (1965) Some questions concerning methods of leadership, June 1, 1943. In: Selected works of Mao Tse-Tung, vol III. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, pp 117–122
Mao T-T (1977) On the ten major relationships. In: Selected works of Mao Tse-Tung, vol V. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, pp 284–307
Marchant GE (2011) Addressing the pacing problem. In: Marchant GE, Allenby BR, Herkert JR (eds) The growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight: the pacing problem. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 199–206
Marmor A (2011) The conventional foundations of law. In: Bertea S, Pavlakos G (eds) New essays on the normativity of law. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 143–157
Martinek M (2014) Special Economic Zones in China and WTO: bleak or bright future? ZChinR 21(1):41–51
Mei X (梅旭成) (2013) A brief talk on problems and reforms of legislative power of China’s Special Economic Zones (浅谈我国经济特区立法权存在的问题与改革思路). Legal System and Economics (法制与经济) (10):63–64
Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国商务部) (2005) “International Business Daily” discussing the top ten Business News of 2003 (《国际商报》评出国内商贸2003年十大新闻). http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/zt_pingxuan/subjectd/200612/20061204031248.shtml. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国商务部) (2015) 219 state-level economic and technical development zones (国家级经济技术开发区 219个). http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/xglj/kaifaqu.shtml. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Montinola G, Qiang Y, Weingast BR (1995) Federalism, Chinese style: the political basis for economic success in China. World Politics 48(1):50–81
Muchlinski PT (2007) Multinational enterprises & the law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Muchlinski P (2011) SEZs – a policy tool in search of a new agenda? In: Carter C, Harding A (eds) Special Economic Zones in Asian market economies. Routledge, London, pp 15–37
Nallathiga R (2008) From import substitution to export promotion: the changing contours of economic policy (with specific reference to Export Promotion under Special Economic Zones). The Asian Economic Review 50(3):495–510
Naughton B (2009) Singularity and replicability in China’s developmental experience (draft). http://www.chinapolitik.de/files/no_68.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Noll P (1973) Gesetzgebungslehre. Rowohlt, Hamburg
Ou Y (欧阳英) (2014) On “Wading across the stream by feeling the way” (关于“摸着石头过河”思想的深入思考). Studies on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theories (毛泽东邓小平理论研究) (11):81–85
Paler L (2005) China’s Legislation Law and the making of a more orderly and representative legislative system. The China Quarterly 182:301–318
Paling DR, Ju S, Lam CKY (2012) Quick reference to the trade and customs law of China: Chapter 9 - bonded zones, 3rd edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan de Rijn
Patterson EW (1940) Pragmatism as a philosophy of law. In: Ratner S (ed) The philosopher of the common man: essays in honor of John Dewey to celebrate His Eightieth Birthday. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, pp 172–204
Pearson MM (1991) Joint ventures in the People’s Republic of China. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Peng Z (彭真) (1992) On political and legal works in New China (论新中国的政法工作). Beijing Press of CCP Documents (中央文献出版社), Beijing
People’s Daily Online (2016) Decision of the NPCSC on revising four laws on foreign investment (全国人大常委会关于修改《中华人民共和国外资企业法》等四部法律的决定). http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2016-09/05/nw.D110000renmrb_20160905_5-04.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Philion SE (2009) Workers’ democracy in China’s transition from state socialism. Routledge, New York
Phillips T (2017) Xi Jinping heralds ‘new era’ of Chinese power at Communist party congress. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/18/xi-jinping-speech-new-era-chinese-power-party-congress. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Posner RA (1990) What has pragmatism to offer law? S. Cal. L. Rev. 63:1653–1670
Pow E, Moser MJ (1987) Law and investment in China’s special investment areas. In: Moser MJ (ed) Foreign trade, investment, and the law in the People’s Republic of China, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press China, Hong Kong, pp 199–303
Qian N (钱宁峰) (2015) The suspension of laws: the new normality of the delegated legislation model (立法后中止实施:授权立法模式的新常态). Political Science and Law (政治与法律) (7):55–63
Qian H (钱弘道), Du W (杜维超) (2015) On experimentalism rule of law: a methodological approach of China Practical School of Rule of Law (论实验主义法治——中国法治实验学派的一种方法论进路). Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences Online Edition) (浙江大学学报 (人文社会科学版网络版)):2–15
Qin Q (秦前红) (2005) The changes of Chinese legislative mode from a constitutional perspective (宪政视野下的中国立法模式变迁). China Legal Science (中国法学) (3):42–48
Ranchordás S (2013) The whys and woes of experimental legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 1(3):415–440
Ranchordás S (2014) Constitutional sunsets and experimental legislation: a comparative perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham
Ranchordás S (2015a) Innovation-friendly regulation: the sunset of regulation, the sunrise of innovation. Jurimetrics J. 55(2):201–224
Ranchordás S (2015b) Sunset clauses and experimental regulations: blessing or curse for legal certainty? Statute Law Review 36(1):28–45
Ranchordás S (2015c) Timing, timing, and experimental legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 3(2):135–139
Rawski TG (1995) Implications of China’s reform experience. The China Quarterly 144:1150–1173
Riccardi L (2016) Investing in China through free trade zones. Springer, Heidelberg
Rodrik D (2009) The new development economics: we shall experiment, but how shall we learn. In: Cohen J, Easterly W (eds) What works in development? Thinking big and thinking small. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 24–54
Rui M (1983–1984) New developments in China’s economic legislation. Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 22:61–76
Sahling L (2008) China’s Special Economic Zones and National Industrial Parks – door openers to economic reform. ProLogis – Research Bulleting:1–15. http://studylib.net/doc/18407792/china-s-special-economic-zones-and-national-industrial-parks. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
Schulz S (2012) In China, experimentation is the Norm. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/putting-the-plan-into-action-how-china-s-leaders-steer-a-massive-nation-a-843593-3.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Shang M (2008) Process of development of China’s system of law on foreign economy. China Law (4):86–90
Shen Z (1999) Legal transplant and comparative law. Revue internationale de droit comparé 51(4):853–857
Shen Y (2000) Conceptions and receptions of legality: understanding the complexity of law reform. In: Turner KG, Feinerman JV, Guy KR (eds) The limits of the rule of law in China. University of Washington Press, Washington DC, pp 20–44
Shen X, Xu S (2012) China: Shenzhen Special Economic Zone as a policy reform incubator for urban land market development. In: Shen X, Sun X (eds) Untying the land knot: making equitable, efficient, and sustainable use of industrial and commercial land. World Bank Publications, Washington DC, pp 87–103
Sit VF (1985) The Special Economic Zones of China: a new type of export processing zone? The developing economies 23(1):69–87
Smeenk G, Duan Y, Veldhoen D (2017) China: China’s free trade zones – overview of 2017 developments. http://www.mondaq.com/china/x/613578/Inward+Foreign+Investment/Chinas+Free+Trade+Zones+Overview+Of+2017+Developments. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
Sohu (2015) “A fine of 100 Yuan for peeing in the wrong direction” – how many of such regulations does Shenzhen offer? (“尿歪罚一百”类似“白条”法规深圳还有). http://roll.sohu.com/20150327/n410385618.shtml. Accessed 21 Dec 2017
Starck C (1995) Der demokratische Verfassungsstaat. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Stettner R (1989) Verfassungsbindungen des experimentierenden Gesetzgebers. NVwZ:806–812
Su W (苏维民) (2008) Yang Shangkun in Guangdong at the beginning of the reform and opening up policy (改革开放之初杨尚昆在广东). Hundred Year Tide (百年潮) (2):18–24. http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/64093/67507/7085873.html. Accessed 21 Dec 2017
Sullivan M, Solove DJ (2003) Can pragmatism be radical? Richard Posner and legal pragmatism. The Yale Law Journal 113:687–741
Sun H (孙洪波) (2007) On the legal theory basis of the authorized legislation (论授权立法的法理性基础). Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy (吉林公安高等专科学教学报) 22(5):85–89
Tan B (谭波), Huang Y (黄琰) (2013) On the reform path of legislation of Special Economic Zones (论我国经济特区立法的改革路径). Journal of Jianghan University (Social Science Edition) (江汉大学学报(社会科学版)) 30(3):50–54
Tang J, Linowski D (2011) Corporate governance at the Chinese stock market: how it evolved. In: Brink A (ed) Corporate governance and business ethics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 107–158
Teets JC, Hurst W (2015) Introduction: the politics and patterns of policy diffusion in China. In: Teets JC, Hurst W (eds) Local governance innovation in China: experimentation, diffusion and defiance. Routledge, London, pp 1–24
The World Bank (2016) China – overview. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Tian D (田杜国) (2011) The local features in the local lawmaking (地方立法中的灵魂——“地方特色”). Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators (山西省政法管理干部学院学报) 24(3):16–18
Torres RA (2007) Free zones and the World Trade Organization agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures. Global Trade and Customs Journal 2(5):217–223
Tsang S-K (1998) Sequencing, resistance and forced innovation: a longer view of China’s financial reforms. Int’l J. of Pub. Admin. 21(9):1323–1362
van der Hum R (1995) The PRC’s Special Economic Zone Policy. In: De Roo AJ, Jagtenberg RW (eds) Yearbook – law & legal practice in East Asia 1995, vol 1. Brill, The Hague, pp 53–64
van Rooij B (2006) Regulating land and pollution in China: lawmaking, compliance, and enforcement; theory and cases. Leiden University Press, Leiden
Vogel EF (2011) Deng Xiaoping and the transformation of China. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Wang C (2006) Law-making functions of the Chinese courts: judicial activism in a country of rapid social changes. Front. Law China:524–549
Wang S (王绍光) (2008) Learning and adapting: the case of rural healthcare financing in China (学习机制与适应能力: 中国农村合作医疗体制变迁的启示). Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学) (6):111–133
Wang B (王彬) (2010a) Economic analysis of the legislative model of “pilot regulations” (“先行先试”立法模式的经济分析). Journal of Shandong Police College (山东警察学院学报) (1):66–70
Wang W (2010b) Super-national treatment: a misconception or a creation with Chinese characteristics. Front. Law China 5(3):376–396
Wang W (2011) China’s experience in legislation on Special Economic Zones. China Law (1):93–99
Wang K (王坤驰) (2015a) Core analysis of “benign unconstitutionality” (浅析“良性违宪”). Journal of Changchun Education Institute (长春教育学院学报) 31(24):7–9
Wang Y (2015b) The application of administrative innovation and the principle of law reservation. Studies in Sociology of Science - CSCanada 6(6):5–11
Wassermann U (1976) Export processing zones. Journal of World Trade Law 10(5):478–489
Wei S, Vanhullebusch M (2015) Where is the Alchemy? The experiment of the Shanghai Free Trade Zone in freeing the foreign investment regime in China. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 16(2):321–352
Wigdor D (1974) Roscoe Pound – Philosopher of Law. Praeger, Westport
Wong S-W, Tang B-s (2005) Challenges to the sustainability of ‘development zones’: a case study of Guangzhou Development District, China. Cities 22(4):303–316
Wu W (1999) Pioneering economic reform in China’s Special Economic Zones. Ashgate, Aldershot
Wu X (吴小云) (2004) The heart and soul of legislation in the Special Economic Zones – conference speech on the delegated legislative power of Special Economic Zones (经济特区立法的灵魂——在经济特区授权立法联席会议上的发言提纲). Hainan People’s Congress (海南人大) (1):30–31
Wu P (吴鹏) (2007) The system of delegated legislation to Special Economic Zone should be abolished (经济特区授权立法法制度应被废除). Journal of Yunnan University Law Edition (云南大学学报法学版) 20(1):1–5
Wu Y (2015) Shanghai grows in size, importance: expanded area will provide more space for experimenting with financial sector reform. http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2015-04/21/content_20492742.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Wu Z, Li J (eds) (2015) Analyzing the legislation law of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国立法法解读). Law Press China (法制出版社), Beijing
Wu Y, Luo Y (2017) What will become of foreign investment in China under the new record-filing system? https://www.chinalawinsight.com/2017/08/articles/corporate/what-will-become-of-foreign-investment-in-china-under-the-new-record-filing-system/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Wu H (吴昊), Wen T (温天力) (2012) The advantages and limitations of China’s local policy reform tests (中国地方政策试验式改革的优势与局限性). Social Science Front (社会科学战线) (10):37–45
Wuttke C (2012) Die chinesische Stadt im Transformationsprozess: Governanceformen und Mechanismen institutionellen Wandels am Beispiel des Perflussdeltas. edition sigma, Berlin, Germany
Xia M (2008) The People’s congresses and Governance in China: toward a network mode of governance. Routledge, London
Xinhua (2016) China approves plea bargaining in criminal cases. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-09/03/c_135656720.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Xinhua (2017) Shenzhen GDP up 9 pct, ranks fourth in mainland cities. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-01/23/c_136007205.htm. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
Xinhuanet (2015) China approves three new free trade zones. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-03/24/c_134093934.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Xinhuanet (2017) Xi Jinping: to secure a decisive victory in building a moderately prosperous society in all respects and strive for the great success of socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era (习近平:决胜全面建成小康社会 夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告). http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/19cpcnc/2017-10/27/c_1121867529.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Xu T, Schiwow E (2006) Foreign investment vehicles in China – overview of the legal framework. GesKR (4):331–335
Yan W, Wang L (2016) Development of Shanghai’s free trade zone logistics. In: Liu B-L, Wang L, Lee S-J, Liu J, Qin F, Jiao Z-L (eds) Contemporary logistics in China: proliferation and internationalization. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–210
Yang X (1988) Hainan Province – China’s largest SEZ. http://www.bjreview.com.cn/Cover_Story_Series_2010/2010-02/03/content_244683.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Yang L (杨龙芳) (2004) The legislative innovation in Shenzhen SEZ: its history, features and prospect (论深圳经济特区: 地方立法创新的历史,特色与前景). Journal of Shenzhen University (深圳大学学报) 21(2):5–9
Yang D (杨登峰) (2014) Path of rule of law of regional reform – on the legal path of Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone (区域改革的法治之路——析上海自贸区先行先试的法治路径). Research on Rule of Law (法治研究) (12):43–50
Yang L (杨浏), Yang Y (杨一凡) (2016) How the reform of the legislation law influences the districted cities (论立法法修改给设区的市带来的影响). Legality Vision (法制博览) (2):119–120
Ye Y (叶永烈) (2012) Deng Xiaoping changed China - 1978: Chinese destiny at a major turning point (邓小平改变中国——1978: 中国命运大转折). Sichuan People’s Publishing House (四川人民出版社)/Huaxia Publishing House (华夏出版社), Chengdu/Beijing
Yeung H (2015) A tale of two cities: Shenzhen and Shanghai – rivalry or division of role? University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper No. 15-03, pp 1–29
Yeung Y-M, Lee J, Kee G (2009) China’s Special Economic Zones at 30. Eurasian Geography and Economics 50(2):222–235
Yin P (2015) A law for the law: the legal system gets a new suit of armor. http://www.bjreview.com.cn/quotes/txt/2015-06/04/content_680341_3.htm. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
Yu X (1989) Legal pragmatism in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Chinese Law 3(1):29–51
Yu G (2011) The role of mortgages: a case for formal law. In: Yu G (ed) The development of the Chinese legal system: change and challenges. Routledge, London, pp 113–137
Yuan Y, Guo H, Xu H, Li W, Luo S, Lin H, Yuan Y (2010) China’s First Special Economic Zone: the case of Shenzhen. In: Zeng DZ (ed) Building engines for growth and competitiveness in China: experience with Special Economic Zones and industrial clusters. World Bank Publications, Washington DC, pp 55–86
Zeng DZ (2010) How do Special Economic Zones and industrial clusters drive China’s rapid development? In: Zeng DZ (ed) Building engines for growth and competitiveness in China: experience with Special Economic Zones and industrial clusters. World Bank Publications, Washington DC, pp 1–53
Zeng DZ (2015) Global experiences with Special Economic Zones: with a focus on China and Africa. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/21854/WPS7240.pdf?sequence=2. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Zhang W (张文显) (1995a) Inheritance, transplant and reform – the only way for legal development (继承·移植·改革:法律发展的必由之路). Social Science Front (社会科学战线) (2):9–17
Zhang Z (张子胜) (1995b) On the legislation plan – the current status of “Once a situation is ready, a legislation is enacted” (略论立法规划——从“成熟一个,制定一个”的立法状态谈起). Law (法学) (7):44–47
Zhang X (1998) Economic legislation in the Pearl River Delta. In: Cheng JY (ed) The Guangdong development model and its challenges. City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong, pp 111–146
Zhang W (张慰) (2011) Analysis and critique of materiality theory - inspection based on German Public Law Theory (“重要性理论”之梳理与批判——基于德国公法学理论的检视). Administrative Law Review (行政法学研究) (2):113–124
Zhang Q (2015) Legalising central-local relations in China. In: Harding A, Sidel M (eds) Central-local relations in Asian constitutional systems. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 17–36
Zhang H (张洪林), Cai T (蔡天新) (2010) Deng Xiaoping’s thoughts of Special Economic Zones and reform and opening-up in the new era (邓小平经济特区思想与新时期的改革开放). Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Socal Science Edition) (北京工业大学学报 (社会科学版)) 10(5):29–36
Zhong X (钟晓渝) (2001) The legislative system of Shenzhen SEZ (深圳立法制). In: Zhou C, Zhong X (eds) The legislative power and legislative plan of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone research study (深圳经济特区立法权与立法规划——研究). China Legal Publishing House (中国法制出版社), Beijing, pp 15–38
Zhong X (钟晓渝) (2011) Legislation and founding of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone (立法与深圳经济特区的建立). Journal of Shenzhen Polytechnic (深圳职业技术学院学报) 10(6):3–9
Zhong X (钟晓渝) (2012) Shenzhen: legislation and development (完善特区立法与经济特区的文莱发展). Journal of Shenzhen Polytechnic (深圳职业技术学院学报) 11(6):3–8
Zhou X (周晓红) (1992) Survey of research concerning legislative competence and other issues (关于立法权限等问题的研究综述). China Legal Science (中国法学) (1):115–118
Zhou W (周旺生) (2004) Science of legislation (立法学). Law Press (法律出版社), Beijing
Zhou X (2014) The frontline of reform: one year on from its establishment, how is Shanghai’s free trade zone doing thus far? Beijing Review 57(42):14–17
Zhou Q (周浅) (2015) The local legislative power from the perspective of the new legislation law (新《立法法》视角下的地方立法权). Legality Vision (法制博览):140–141
Zhu Y (2013) Policy entrepreneurship, institutional constraints, and local policy innovation in China. The China Review 13(2):97–122
Zimmerman JM (2010) China law deskbook: a legal guide to foreign-invested enterprises, 3rd edn. Chicago
Zippelius R (1991) Die experimentierende Methode im Recht. In: Alexy R, Dreier R, Neumann U (eds) Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie in Deutschland Heute. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 44. Franz Steiner, Stuttgart, pp 411–426
Zou K (2006) China’s legal reform: towards the rule of law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martinek, M. (2018). China’s Experimentalist Approach to Reform. In: Experimental Legislation in China between Efficiency and Legality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77616-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77616-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77615-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77616-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)