Abstract
Classroom practitioners are often asked to adopt continually changing standards, to be collaborators and reflective practitioners, and to make new and evolving technologies an integral part of their practice. Understanding Problems of Practice: A Case Study in Design Research describes a process for thinking about and reflecting on innovative practice – the design research process. Each of the five phases of the design research process is exemplified by a discussion of how the authors used this process to create a technology education course for perspective secondary educators. In this chapter, the authors explore the fourth phase of the design research process, evaluating learning outcomes. Acknowledging that even though design decisions may result in powerful learning environments, they may not result in powerful learning. Thus, it is necessary in the fourth phase of the design research process to evaluate learning outcomes. The authors describe strategies and techniques recommended in the design research literature associated with evaluating learning outcomes. They conclude the chapter with the fourth phase of the design research project in which they describe how as classroom practitioners they used quantitative research methods to evaluate changes in teacher attitudes and technology knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2008, March). TCPK in preservice teacher education: Preparing primary education students to teach with technology. New York: Paper presented at the AERA annual conference.
Bannan, B. (2013). The integrative learning design framework: An illustrated example from the domain of instructional technology. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research part A: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 114–133). Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding a teacher’s knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms & practices (pp. 35–66). New York: Teachers College Press.
Cullen, T. A., & Greene, B. A. (2011). Preservice teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and motivation about technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(1), 29–47.
Ertmer, P., & Ottenbriet-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html.
Hathaway, D., & Norton, P. (2016). A preservice secondary education technology course: Attitudes, knowledge, and learner outcomes. In L. Liu & D. C. Gibson (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2016 (pp. 119–126). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York: Routledge.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Palak, D., & Walls, R. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and technology practices: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417–441.
Pelton, L., & Pelton, T. W. (1996). Building attitudes: How a technology course affects preservice teachers’ attitudes about technology. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 1996, 167–172.
Razzak, N. A. (2014). In-service teachers’ attitudes towards technology integration in the Bahraini classroom. World Journal on Educational Technology, 6(1), 60–74.
Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54, 103–112.
Sauro, J. (2013, August 13). Best practices for using statistics on small sample sizes. Measuring Usability. Retrieved from http://www.measuringu.com/blog/small-n.php
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological, pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hathaway, D., Norton, P. (2018). Evaluating Learning Outcomes. In: Understanding Problems of Practice. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77559-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77559-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77558-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77559-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)