Abstract
Classroom practitioners are often asked to adopt continually changing standards, to be collaborators and reflective practitioners, and to make new and evolving technologies an integral part of their practice. Understanding Problems of Practice: A Case Study in Design Research describes a process for thinking about and reflecting on innovative practice – the design research process. Each of the five phases of the design research process is exemplified by a discussion of how the authors used this process to create a technology education course for perspective secondary educators. In this chapter, the authors focus on the second phase of the design research process and the goal of transitioning a problem of practice to a design solution. The authors begin with a description of strategies and techniques used by design researchers to gather information that grounds a design solution in evidence leading to an explicit and visible map for instructional planning. The authors offer a comprehensive description of the design pattern approach as a strategy to promote classroom practitioners’ ability to transition from an understanding of their problem of practice to a design solution. They conclude the chapter by presenting the second design research phase of a case study to create an online version of a technology education course for perspective secondary educators, presenting how as classroom practitioners they completed a second review of literature to create a design pattern and the ways in which the design pattern framed an instructional plan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers’ social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 42–66. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/pdf/arnoldducate.pdf.
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24.
Brzycki, D., & Dudt, K. (2005). Overcoming barriers to technology use in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 619–641.
Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: An examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as they attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211–237.
Crochet, M. (2014). Exploring preservice teacher education that connects technology use and historical thinking in the social studies classroom: A case study. Unpublished dissertation. George Mason University. Fairfax, VA.
Dougherty, E. (2012). Assignments matter: Making the connections that help students meet standards. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Garrison, D., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19, 133–148.
Goldkuhl, G. (2013). Activity cycle in design research: A pragmatic conceptualization of inter-related practice. In M. Helfert & B. Donnallen (Eds.), Design science: Perspectives from Europe, Communications in Computer and Information Science series (Vol. 388, pp. 49–60). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Hathaway, D., & Norton, P. (2013). Designing an online course content structure using a design patterns approach. Educational Technology, 53(2), 3–15.
Lemke, J. L. (1987). Social semiotics and science education. The American Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 217–232.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York: Routledge.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2214–2226). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2014). Using a design pattern framework to structure online course content: Two design cases. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (pp. 1440–1449). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2017). Using a design pattern framework to structure online course content: Two design cases. International Journal on E-Learning., 16(2), 175–193.
Van Duyne, D., Landay, J., & Hong, J. (2007). The design of sites: Patterns for creating winning web sites (2nd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hathaway, D., Norton, P. (2018). Creating a Design Solution. In: Understanding Problems of Practice. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77559-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77559-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77558-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77559-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)