Skip to main content

A Marketplace for Smart Production Ecosystems

Managing Variability of Products and Factories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Customization 4.0

Abstract

The need for product variability to satisfy the needs of customers means that the process of manufacturing these products must also expose a similar degree of flexibility. In this sense, production facilities (factories) can be seen as product lines of manufacturing services. The focus of this paper is on modeling variability of the products in association with the variability in production requirements – the interplay of which gives birth to a smart production ecosystem. We describe an open marketplace, where product sellers can offer their products with variability, end customers can configure these for their needs, and factories can offer their services to manufacture these customized products. Typically, the equipment used to build up the factory also offers variability; therefore the ecosystem also encompasses equipment vendors and the variability of this equipment. We attempt to bring together stakeholders of a production ecosystem in a marketplace that exploits product line engineering techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://smartmanufacturingcoalition.org/

  2. 2.

    https://industrialinternetconsortium.org/

  3. 3.

    https://www.plattform-i40.de/

  4. 4.

    Psupply XC is not a real product name but a pseudonym for illustrative purposes.

References

  1. Asikainen, T., Männistö, T., Soininen, T.: A unified conceptual foundation for feature modelling. In: Proceedings of 10th International Software Product Line Conference SPLC, Baltimore, 21–24 Aug 2006, pp. 31–40 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/SPLINE.2006.1691575

  2. Bejlegaard, M., Brunoe, T.D., Nielsen, K., Bossen, J.: Machine-part formation enabling reconfigurable manufacturing systems configuration design: line balancing problem for low volume and high variety. In: Managing Complexity, pp. 139–146. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29058-4_11

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beuche, D.: Using pure: variants across the product line lifecycle. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Systems and Software Product Line Conference SPLC, Beijing, 16–23 Sept 2016, pp. 333–336 (2016). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2934466.2962729

  4. Bossen, J., Brunoe, T.D., Bejlegaard, M., Nielsen, K.: Conceptual model for developing platform-centric production architectures. In: Managing Complexity, pp. 83–98. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29058-4_7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campagna, D., Formisano, A.: Product and production process modeling and configuration. Fundamenta Informaticae 124(4), 403–425 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/FI-2013-841

    Google Scholar 

  6. Czarnecki, K., Antkiewicz, M.: Mapping features to models: a template approach based on superimposed variants. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering (GPCE’05), pp. 422–437. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11561347_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U.W.: Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 10(1), 7–29 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhungana, D., Falkner, A.A., Haselböck, A., Schreiner, H.: Smart factory product lines: a configuration perspective on smart production ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line SPLC, Nashville, 20–24 July 2015, pp. 201–210 (2015). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2791060.2791066

  9. DIN 8593-0:2003-09: Manufacturing Processes Joining, Part 0: General; Classification, Subdivision, Terms and Definitions. Standard, Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (Sep 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (DE) (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Fantechi, A.: Topologically configurable systems as product families. In: 17th International Software Product Line Conference SPLC, Tokyo, 26–30 Aug 2013, pp. 151–156 (2013). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2491627.2491643

  12. Felfernig, A., Hotz, L., Bagley, C., Tiihonen, J.: Knowledge-based Configuration: From Research to Business Cases, 1st edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heidenreich, F., Kopcsek, J., Wende, C.: Featuremapper: mapping features to models. In: Companion of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE Companion’08, pp. 943–944. ACM, New York (2008). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370175.1370199

  14. Hodek, S., Floerchinger, F.: An approach for modular production from mechanics to decentralized control, realized in the smartfactoryKL. In: Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation ETFA, 22–25 Sept 2008, pp. 1–7. Palma de Mallorca, Spain (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jansen, S., Bloemendal, E.: Defining app stores: the role of curated marketplaces in software ecosystems. In: Software Business. Proceedings of 4th International Conference From Physical Products to Software Services and Solutions ICSOB, Potsdam, 11–14 June 2013, pp. 195–206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39336-5_19

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Peterson, A.S.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mackworth, A.K.: Consistency in networks of relations. Artif. Intell. 8(1), 99–118 (1977). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(77)90007-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Piller, F.T., Moeslein, K., Stotko, C.M.: Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration. Prod. Plan. Control 15(4), 435–444 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rabiser, R., Grünbacher, P., Dhungana, D.: Requirements for product derivation support: results from a systematic literature review and an expert survey. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(3), 324–346 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabin, D., Weigel, R.: Product configuration frameworks – a survey. IEEE Intell. Syst. 13(4), 42–49 (1998). http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/5254.708432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmid, K., Eichelberger, H.: EASy-producer: from product lines to variability-rich software ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Systems and Software Product Line Conference SPLC, Beijing, 16–23 Sept 2016, p. 309 (2016). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2934466.2956657

  22. Thomassen, M.K., Alfnes, E.: Mass customization challenges of engineer-to-order manufacturing. In: Managing Complexity, pp. 27–39. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29058-4_3

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tolvanen, J., Kelly, S.: Creating domain-specific modeling languages for product lines. In: 15th International Conference on Software Product Lines SPLC 2011, 22–26 Aug 2011, p. 358, Munich (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/SPLC.2011.9

  24. Vogel-Heuser, B., Diedrich, C., Pantförder, D., Göhner, P.: Coupling heterogeneous production systems by a multi-agent based cyber-physical production system. In: 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics INDIN, 27–30 July 2014, pp. 713–719, Porto Alegre (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wiendahl, H.P., Elmaraghy, H.A., Nyhuis, P., Zäh, M., Wiendahl, H.H., Duffie, N., Brieke, M.: Changeable manufacturing – classification, design and operation. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 56(2), 783–809 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yip, A.L.K., Rauschecker, U., Corney, J., Qin, Y., Jagadeesan, A.: Enabling product customisation in manufacturing clouds. In: Cloud-Based Design and Manufacturing (CBDM), pp. 153–178. Springer, Cham (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07398-9_6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Dhungana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dhungana, D., Haselböck, A., Taupe, R. (2018). A Marketplace for Smart Production Ecosystems. In: Hankammer, S., Nielsen, K., Piller, F., Schuh, G., Wang, N. (eds) Customization 4.0. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77556-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics