Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Product Configuration in the ETO and Capital Goods Industry: A Literature Review and Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Customization 4.0

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

Product configurators are IT tools often used to enable choice navigation in mass customization environments, with the purpose of giving companies the ability to interact and deliver customized products to the customers. While product configurators have been widely adapted and investigated in the consumer industry, research on which challenges companies are facing in the ETO and capital goods industry, in regard to product configuration, is less extensive. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to identify challenges in applying product configuration for ETO and capital goods companies, as well as reviewing potential solutions in research, which can be applied to address these challenges. The findings show a gap between the solutions and challenges especially in the area of staging commitments of product characteristics, flexible management of alterations to the configuration design, and connecting decision criteria in product configuration with supply chain processes. The gap analysis lays the foundation for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acha, V., Davies, A., Hobday, M., et al.: Exploring the capital goods economy: complex product systems in the UK. Ind. Corp. Chang. 13, 505–529 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertrand, J., Muntslag, D.: Production control in engineer-to-order firms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 30, 3–22 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brière-Côté, A., Rivest, L., Desrochers, A.: Adaptive generic product structure modelling for design reuse in engineer-to-order products. Comput. Ind. 61, 53–65 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunoe, T. D.: Product Family Modelling in Engineer to Order Processes. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chavali, S.R., Sen, C., Mocko, G.M., et al.: Using rule based design in engineer to order industry: an SME case study. Comput. Aided Design Appl. 5, 178–193 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, C., Liao, G., Lin, K.: An attribute-based and object-oriented approach with system implementation for change impact analysis in variant product design. Comput. Aided Des. 62, 203–217 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U.: Staged configuration through specialization and multilevel configuration of feature models. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 10, 143–169 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dou, R., Zong, C., Nan, G.: Multi-stage interactive genetic algorithm for collaborative product customization. Knowl. Based Syst. 92, 43–54 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duchi, A., Pourabdollahian, G., Sili, D., et al.: Motivations and challenges for engineer-to-order companies moving toward mass customization. IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 440, 320–327 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fogliatto, F.S., da Silveira, G.J.C., Borenstein, D.: The mass customization decade: an updated review of the literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 138, 14 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gann, D.M., Salter, A.J.: Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Res. Policy. 29, 955–972 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gepp, M., Foehr, M., Vollmar, J.: Standardization, modularization and platform approaches in the engineer-to-order business. In: Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon). IEEE, Orlando (2016). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7490549/

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gosling, J., Naim, M.M.: Engineer-to-order supply chain management: a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 122, 741–754 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grabenstetter, D.H., Usher, J.M.: Developing due dates in an engineer-to-order engineering environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52, 6349–6361 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gunasekarana, A., Ngai, E.W.T.: Build-to-order supply chain management: a literature review and framework for development. J. Oper. Manage. 23, 423–451 (2005). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272696304001184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haug, A., Hvam, L.: Representation of industrial knowledge-as a basis for developing and maintaining product configurators. Technical University of DenmarkDanmarks Tekniske Universitet, Department of Management EngineeringInstitut for Systemer, Produktion og Ledelse, Operations ManagementOperations Management (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haug, A., Ladeby, K., Edwards, K.: From engineer-to-order to mass customization. Manag. Res. News. 32, 633–644 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hicks, C., McGovern, T.: Product life cycle management in engineer-to-order industries. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 48, 153–167 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hicks, C., McGovern, T., Earl, C.F.: Supply chain management: a strategic issue in engineer to order manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 65, 179–190 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirsch, B., Krömker, M., Thoben, K., et al.: BIDPREP—an approach for simultaneous bid preparation. Comput. Ind. 26, 273–279 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hobday, M.: Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Res. Policy. 26, 689–710 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hvam, L., Mortensen, N.H., Riis, J.: Product Customization. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jiao, J.R., Simpson, T.W., Siddique, Z.: Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review. J. Intell. Manuf. 18, 5–29 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karlsson, C., Nellore, R., Soderquist, K.: Black box engineering: redefining the role of product specifications. J. Prod. Innovation Manage. 15, 534–549 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Konijnendijk, P.A.: Coordinating marketing and manufacturing in ETO companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 37, 19–26 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kristianto, Y., Helo, P., Jiao, R.J.: A system level product configurator for engineer-to-order supply chains. Comput. Ind. 72, 82–82-91 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krömker, M., Thoben, K., Wickner, A.: An infrastructure to support concurrent engineering in bid preparation. Comput. Ind. 33, 201–208 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Levandowski, C.E., Jiao, J.R., Johannesson, H.: A two-stage model of adaptable product platform for engineering-to-order configuration design. J. Eng. Design. 26, 220–235 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu, R.F., Petersen, T.D., Storch, R.L.: Modeling customized product configuration in large assembly manufacturing with supply-chain considerations. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 19, 685–712 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meerkamm, S.: Staged configuration of multi-perspectives variants based on a generic data model. In: International Conference on Business Process Management. BPM 2011: Business Process Management Workshops, Clermont-Ferrand, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 100, pp. 326–337. Springer, New York (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mello, M.H., Strandhagen, J.O., Alfnes, E.: The role of coordination in avoiding project delays in an engineer-to-order supply chain. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 26, 429–454 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mert, G., Herder, C., Menck, N., et al.: Innovative services for customized, availability-oriented business models for the capital goods industry. Procedia CIRP. 47, 501–506 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Miaofen, Z., Shaohui, S., Youping, G., et al.: Research on the configuration design of the ETO product based on knowledge and thing characteristic table. In: International Conference on Applied Informatics and Communication, Xi’ian, 20–21 August 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 226, pp. 273–281. Springer, New York (2011). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-23235-0

    Google Scholar 

  34. Oddsson, G., Ladeby, K.R.: From a literature review of product configuration definitions to a reference framework. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manufacturing. 28, 413–428 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pandit, A., Zhu, Y.: An ontology-based approach to support decision-making for the design of ETO (engineer-to-order) products. Autom. Constr. 16, 759–770 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Petersen, T.D.: Product configuration in ETO companies. In: Blecker, T., Friedrich, G. (eds.) Mass Customization Information Systems in Business, pp. 59–76. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roy, R., Shehab, E., Tiwari, A., et al.: Configuration of product-service systems. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 20, 591–605 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schönsleben, P.: Methods and tools that support a fast and efficient design-to-order process for parameterized product families. CIRP Ann. Manufacturing Technol. 61, 179–182 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shamsuzzoha, A., Kankaanpaa, T., Carneiro, L., et al.: Collaborative customization strategy for complex products - prospects for engineer-to-order and customize-to-order production scenarios. IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 362, 105–114 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brunoe, T.D.: Product family modelling for multilevel configuration. In: Joint Conference: InternationalMass Customization Meeting 2007 (IMCM’07) & International Conference on Economic, Technical and Organisational Aspects of Product Configuration Systems (PETO’07), Hamburg. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tidstam, A.: Efficient Development of Vehicle Configuration Rules. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tseng, H., Chang, C., Chang, S.: Applying case-based reasoning for product configuration in mass customization environments. Expert Syst. Appl. 29, 913–925 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Veldman, J., Alblas, A.: Managing design variety, process variety and engineering change: a case study of two capital good firms. Res. Eng. Des. 23, 269–290 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Willner, O., Rippel, M., Wandfluh, M., et al.: Development of a business process matrix for structuring the implications of using configurators in an engineer-to-order environment. IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 397, 278–285 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yujun, L., Chunqing, W.: Configuration knowledge expression of ETO product for mass customization. In: Seventh International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, pp. 733–738. IEEE, Shenzhen (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zeng, Q.: Staged postponement of committing order specifications. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang, L.L.: Product configuration: a review of the state-of-the-art and future research. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52, 6381–6398 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, L.L., Literature Review, A.: On multitype platforming and framework for future research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 168, 1–12 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zins, C.: Success, a structured search strategy: rationale, principles, and implications. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 51, 1232–1247 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zorzini, M., Corti, D., Pozzetti, A.: Due date (DD) quotation and capacity planning in make-to-order companies: results from an empirical analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 112, 919–933 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Bjørn Christensen & Thomas D. Brunoe

Authors
  1. Bjørn Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas D. Brunoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bjørn Christensen or Thomas D. Brunoe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Stephan Hankammer

  2. Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Kjeld Nielsen

  3. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Frank T. Piller

  4. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Günther Schuh

  5. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Ning Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Christensen, B., Brunoe, T.D. (2018). Product Configuration in the ETO and Capital Goods Industry: A Literature Review and Challenges. In: Hankammer, S., Nielsen, K., Piller, F., Schuh, G., Wang, N. (eds) Customization 4.0. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77556-2_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation