Skip to main content

Mass Customization and Environmental Sustainability: A Large-Scale Empirical Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Customization 4.0

Abstract

A growing number of firms nowadays need to combine mass customization (MC) with environmental sustainability management (EM). However, the research on the synergies or trade-offs between MC and EM is still in its infancy. Furthermore, the few findings available in the literature are partly conflicting: some studies suggest that MC and EM may be synergistic, while others raise concerns on the environmental sustainability of MC. This paper contributes to this debate by presenting the results of the first, large-scale, empirical test of some of the synergies suggested by prior research. Our results support the existence of two types of synergies between the MC capability of parts commonalization and the EM capability of product stewardship. One type of synergy is explained by the fact that parts commonalization capability reinforces the positive effect of product stewardship capability on environmental performance (interaction-based synergy). The other type is explained by the fact that both these organization capabilities require the same routines of cross-functional integration (shared routine-based synergy). Besides enriching the debate on the relationships between MC and EM, our results also contribute to the broader discussion on the compatibility between economic and environmental sustainability dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Markillie, P.: A third industrial revolution. The Economist, April 21, 2012, Special report: manufacturing and innovation, 1–14 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gray, S.: The future is green and growing fast. Entrepreneur, (2017), https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/292816, last accessed 2017/06/26

  3. Liu, G., Shah, R., Schroeder, R.G.: Linking work design to mass customization: a sociotechnical systems perspective. Decis. Sci. 37(4), 519–545 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pine II, B.J.: Mass Customization: the New Frontier in Business Competition. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCarthy, I.P.: Special issue editorial: the what, why and how of mass customization. Prod. Plan. Control. 15(4), 347–351 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K., Van Wassenhove, L.N.: Sustainable operations management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14(4), 482–492 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hora, M., Hankammer, S., Canetta, L., Sel, S.K., Gomez, S., Gahrens, S.: Designing business models for sustainable mass customization: a framework proposal. International. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 7(4), 143–152 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fogliatto, F.S., da Silveira, G.J., Borenstein, D.: The mass customization decade: an updated review of the literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 138(1), 14–25 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, L., Olhager, J., Tang, O.: Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149(1), 154–163 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boër, C.R., Pedrazzoli, P., Bettoni, A., Sorlini, M.: Mass Customization and Sustainability: an Assessment Framework and Industrial Implementation. Springer, London (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Seliger, G., Kim, H.-J., Kernbaum, S., Zettl, M.: Approaches to sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Sustain. Manuf. 1(1–2), 58–77 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Petersen, T.D., Jørgensen, K.A., Nielsen, K., Taps, S.B.: Is mass customization sustainable? In: Chesbrough, H., Piller, F.T. (eds.) Proceedings of the MCPC 2011 World Conference on Mass Customization, Personalization and Co-Creation: Bridging Mass Customization and Open Innovation, San Francisco, CA. Lulu, Inc. Publishers, Raleigh (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pourabdollahian, G., Steiner, F., Rasmussen, O.H., Hankammer, S.: A contribution toward a research agenda: identifying impact factors of mass customization on environmental sustainability. International. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 5(4), 169–178 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salvador, F., de Holan, P.M., Piller, F.: Cracking the code of mass customization. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 50(3), 71–78 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, S.-Y., Klassen, R.D.: Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small- and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 17(6), 573–586 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bharadwaj, A.S.: A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q. 24(1), 169–196 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parmigiani, A., Howard-Grenville, J.: Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5(1), 413–453 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dosi, G., Faillo, M., Marengo, L.: Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: an introduction. Organ. Stud. 29(8–9), 1165–1185 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng, D.X., Schroeder, R.G., Shah, R.: Linking routines to operations capabilities: a new perspective. J. Oper. Manag. 26(6), 730–748 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.: Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26(1), 117–127 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barnett, M.L.: Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(3), 794–816 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A.: A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 40(3), 534–559 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, K.H.: Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations?: the case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. Manag. Decis. 47(7), 1101–1121 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pane Haden, S.S., Oyler, J.D., Humphreys, J.H.: Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: an exploratory analysis. Manag. Decis. 47(7), 1041–1055 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hart, S.L.: A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(4), 986–1014 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aragón-Correa, J.A., Sharma, S.: A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28(1), 71–88 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H.: Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 19(8), 729–753 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bowen, F.E., Cousins, P.D., Lamming, R.C., Farukt, A.C.: The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10(2), 174–189 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miemczyk, J.: An exploration of institutional constraints on developing end-of-life product recovery capabilities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 115(2), 272–282 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong, C.W.Y., Lai, K.-h., Shang, K.-C., Lu, C.-S., Leung, T.K.P.: Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 283–294 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bremmers, H., Haverkamp, D.-J., Omta, O.: Dynamic behavioral fingerprinting’: what drives the deployment of environmental information and communication capabilities? J. Clean. Prod. 17(8), 751–761 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M.A., Ragu-Nathan, T.S.: The impact of time-based manufacturing practices on mass customization and value to customer. J. Oper. Manag. 19(2), 201–217 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zipkin, P.: The limits of mass customization. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 42(3), 81–87 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Salvador, F., Rungtusanatham, M., Akpinar, A., Forza, C.: Strategic capabilities for mass customization: theoretical synthesis and empirical evidence. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2008(1), 1–6 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trentin, A., Forza, C., Perin, E.: Embeddedness and path dependence of organizational capabilities for mass customization and green management: a longitudinal case study in the machinery industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 169, 253–276 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Perera, H.S.C., Nagarur, N., Tabucanon, M.T.: Component part standardization: a way to reduce the life-cycle costs of products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 60–61(1), 109–116 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ulrich, K.: The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy. 24(3), 419–440 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pagell, M.: Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics. J. Oper. Manag. 22(5), 459–487 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kahn, K.B.: Interdepartmental integration: a definition with implications for product development performance. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 13(2), 137–151 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Desai, P., Kekre, S., Radhakrishnan, S., Srinivasan, K.: Product differentiation and commonality in design: balancing revenue and cost drivers. Manag. Sci. 47(1), 37–51 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R.: The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: Sinkovics, R.R., Ghauri, P.N. (eds.) New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing), vol. 20, pp. 277–319. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G.: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wacker, J.G.: A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J. Oper. Manag. 16(4), 361–385 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L.: Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 19(4), 217–229 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., Rodon, J.: Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 149–159 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rao, P., Holt, D.: Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 25(9), 898–916 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J.: Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J. Oper. Manag. 22(3), 265–289 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Walley, N., Whitehead, B.: It's not easy being green. Harv. Bus. Rev. 72(3), 46–52 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Figge, F., Hahn, T.: Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 92–102 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Teece, D.J.: Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy. 15(6), 285–305 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ennen, E., Richter, A.: The whole is more than the sum of its parts—or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. J. Manag. 36(1), 207–233 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Darnall, N., Edwards, D.: Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strateg. Manag. J. 27(4), 301–320 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M.: The importance of quality management for the success of environmental management initiatives. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 407–415 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Christmann, P.: Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad. Manag. J. 43(4), 663–680 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  57. López-Gamero, M.D., Claver-Cortés, E., Molina-Azorín, J.F.: Complementary resources and capabilities for an ethical and environmental management: a qual/quan study. J. Bus. Ethics. 82(3), 701–732 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the financial support of Padova University, project DOR1674244/16 “Mass customization.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Sandrin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sandrin, E., Trentin, A., Forza, C. (2018). Mass Customization and Environmental Sustainability: A Large-Scale Empirical Study. In: Hankammer, S., Nielsen, K., Piller, F., Schuh, G., Wang, N. (eds) Customization 4.0. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77556-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics