Abstract
A growing number of firms nowadays need to combine mass customization (MC) with environmental sustainability management (EM). However, the research on the synergies or trade-offs between MC and EM is still in its infancy. Furthermore, the few findings available in the literature are partly conflicting: some studies suggest that MC and EM may be synergistic, while others raise concerns on the environmental sustainability of MC. This paper contributes to this debate by presenting the results of the first, large-scale, empirical test of some of the synergies suggested by prior research. Our results support the existence of two types of synergies between the MC capability of parts commonalization and the EM capability of product stewardship. One type of synergy is explained by the fact that parts commonalization capability reinforces the positive effect of product stewardship capability on environmental performance (interaction-based synergy). The other type is explained by the fact that both these organization capabilities require the same routines of cross-functional integration (shared routine-based synergy). Besides enriching the debate on the relationships between MC and EM, our results also contribute to the broader discussion on the compatibility between economic and environmental sustainability dimensions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Markillie, P.: A third industrial revolution. The Economist, April 21, 2012, Special report: manufacturing and innovation, 1–14 (2012)
Gray, S.: The future is green and growing fast. Entrepreneur, (2017), https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/292816, last accessed 2017/06/26
Liu, G., Shah, R., Schroeder, R.G.: Linking work design to mass customization: a sociotechnical systems perspective. Decis. Sci. 37(4), 519–545 (2006)
Pine II, B.J.: Mass Customization: the New Frontier in Business Competition. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA (1993)
McCarthy, I.P.: Special issue editorial: the what, why and how of mass customization. Prod. Plan. Control. 15(4), 347–351 (2004)
Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K., Van Wassenhove, L.N.: Sustainable operations management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14(4), 482–492 (2005)
Hora, M., Hankammer, S., Canetta, L., Sel, S.K., Gomez, S., Gahrens, S.: Designing business models for sustainable mass customization: a framework proposal. International. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 7(4), 143–152 (2016)
Fogliatto, F.S., da Silveira, G.J., Borenstein, D.: The mass customization decade: an updated review of the literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 138(1), 14–25 (2012)
Chen, L., Olhager, J., Tang, O.: Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149(1), 154–163 (2014)
Boër, C.R., Pedrazzoli, P., Bettoni, A., Sorlini, M.: Mass Customization and Sustainability: an Assessment Framework and Industrial Implementation. Springer, London (2013)
Seliger, G., Kim, H.-J., Kernbaum, S., Zettl, M.: Approaches to sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Sustain. Manuf. 1(1–2), 58–77 (2008)
Petersen, T.D., Jørgensen, K.A., Nielsen, K., Taps, S.B.: Is mass customization sustainable? In: Chesbrough, H., Piller, F.T. (eds.) Proceedings of the MCPC 2011 World Conference on Mass Customization, Personalization and Co-Creation: Bridging Mass Customization and Open Innovation, San Francisco, CA. Lulu, Inc. Publishers, Raleigh (2011)
Pourabdollahian, G., Steiner, F., Rasmussen, O.H., Hankammer, S.: A contribution toward a research agenda: identifying impact factors of mass customization on environmental sustainability. International. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 5(4), 169–178 (2014)
Salvador, F., de Holan, P.M., Piller, F.: Cracking the code of mass customization. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 50(3), 71–78 (2009)
Lee, S.-Y., Klassen, R.D.: Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small- and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 17(6), 573–586 (2008)
Bharadwaj, A.S.: A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q. 24(1), 169–196 (2000)
Parmigiani, A., Howard-Grenville, J.: Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5(1), 413–453 (2011)
Dosi, G., Faillo, M., Marengo, L.: Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: an introduction. Organ. Stud. 29(8–9), 1165–1185 (2008)
Peng, D.X., Schroeder, R.G., Shah, R.: Linking routines to operations capabilities: a new perspective. J. Oper. Manag. 26(6), 730–748 (2008)
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.: Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26(1), 117–127 (2001)
Barnett, M.L.: Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(3), 794–816 (2007)
Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A.: A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 40(3), 534–559 (1997)
Lee, K.H.: Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations?: the case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. Manag. Decis. 47(7), 1101–1121 (2009)
Pane Haden, S.S., Oyler, J.D., Humphreys, J.H.: Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management: an exploratory analysis. Manag. Decis. 47(7), 1041–1055 (2009)
Hart, S.L.: A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(4), 986–1014 (1995)
Aragón-Correa, J.A., Sharma, S.: A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28(1), 71–88 (2003)
Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H.: Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 19(8), 729–753 (1998)
Bowen, F.E., Cousins, P.D., Lamming, R.C., Farukt, A.C.: The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10(2), 174–189 (2001)
Miemczyk, J.: An exploration of institutional constraints on developing end-of-life product recovery capabilities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 115(2), 272–282 (2008)
Wong, C.W.Y., Lai, K.-h., Shang, K.-C., Lu, C.-S., Leung, T.K.P.: Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 283–294 (2012)
Bremmers, H., Haverkamp, D.-J., Omta, O.: Dynamic behavioral fingerprinting’: what drives the deployment of environmental information and communication capabilities? J. Clean. Prod. 17(8), 751–761 (2009)
Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M.A., Ragu-Nathan, T.S.: The impact of time-based manufacturing practices on mass customization and value to customer. J. Oper. Manag. 19(2), 201–217 (2001)
Zipkin, P.: The limits of mass customization. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 42(3), 81–87 (2001)
Salvador, F., Rungtusanatham, M., Akpinar, A., Forza, C.: Strategic capabilities for mass customization: theoretical synthesis and empirical evidence. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2008(1), 1–6 (2008)
Trentin, A., Forza, C., Perin, E.: Embeddedness and path dependence of organizational capabilities for mass customization and green management: a longitudinal case study in the machinery industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 169, 253–276 (2015)
Perera, H.S.C., Nagarur, N., Tabucanon, M.T.: Component part standardization: a way to reduce the life-cycle costs of products. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 60–61(1), 109–116 (1999)
Ulrich, K.: The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy. 24(3), 419–440 (1995)
Pagell, M.: Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics. J. Oper. Manag. 22(5), 459–487 (2004)
Kahn, K.B.: Interdepartmental integration: a definition with implications for product development performance. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 13(2), 137–151 (1996)
Desai, P., Kekre, S., Radhakrishnan, S., Srinivasan, K.: Product differentiation and commonality in design: balancing revenue and cost drivers. Manag. Sci. 47(1), 37–51 (2001)
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R.: The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: Sinkovics, R.R., Ghauri, P.N. (eds.) New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing), vol. 20, pp. 277–319. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2009)
Aiken, L.S., West, S.G.: Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1991)
Wacker, J.G.: A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J. Oper. Manag. 16(4), 361–385 (1998)
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L.: Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 19(4), 217–229 (2010)
Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., Rodon, J.: Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 149–159 (2012)
Rao, P., Holt, D.: Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 25(9), 898–916 (2005)
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J.: Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J. Oper. Manag. 22(3), 265–289 (2004)
Walley, N., Whitehead, B.: It's not easy being green. Harv. Bus. Rev. 72(3), 46–52 (1994)
Figge, F., Hahn, T.: Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 92–102 (2012)
Teece, D.J.: Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy. 15(6), 285–305 (1986)
Ennen, E., Richter, A.: The whole is more than the sum of its parts—or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. J. Manag. 36(1), 207–233 (2010)
Darnall, N., Edwards, D.: Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strateg. Manag. J. 27(4), 301–320 (2006)
Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M.: The importance of quality management for the success of environmental management initiatives. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 407–415 (2012)
Christmann, P.: Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad. Manag. J. 43(4), 663–680 (2000)
López-Gamero, M.D., Claver-Cortés, E., Molina-Azorín, J.F.: Complementary resources and capabilities for an ethical and environmental management: a qual/quan study. J. Bus. Ethics. 82(3), 701–732 (2008)
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the financial support of Padova University, project DOR1674244/16 “Mass customization.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sandrin, E., Trentin, A., Forza, C. (2018). Mass Customization and Environmental Sustainability: A Large-Scale Empirical Study. In: Hankammer, S., Nielsen, K., Piller, F., Schuh, G., Wang, N. (eds) Customization 4.0. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77556-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77556-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77555-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77556-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)