Advertisement

An Engagement-Related Behaviour Change Approach for SavingFood in Greece

  • Carina Veeckman
  • Wim Vanobberghen
  • Eirini Kalemaki
  • Vasia Madesi
  • Alexander Theodoridis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10750)

Abstract

Food waste is a global problem that has moved up on the political agenda because of its negative social, environmental and economical impact. To prevent food waste, food banks and food rescue charities are collecting edible surplus food from food donors, and match it with welfare organisations to feed people in need. However, these food redistribution organisations face challenges in terms of efficiency, capacity and scale. This paper presents SavingFood, a EU-funded project that involves several grassroots organisations to tackle these challenges through digital social innovation. SavingFood develops a collective awareness platform for connecting food donors, charities and citizens in a more efficient way, and creating an online community in which actors are motivated to take direct action against food waste. To motivate and engage local communities in the usage of the platform, an engagement-related behaviour change strategy with seven different behavioural change techniques was developed. To inform the strategy, surveys and interviews were conducted to investigate participation barriers and enablers of food redistribution among donors, charities and citizens in Greece. The case study focuses on the volunteer and stakeholder network of the Boroume organisation that collects surplus food all over Greece to feed people in need. The results show that citizens and organisations should be engaged according to their level of volunteering experience, attitudes and beliefs around food waste, and should lead up to tailored communication messages, different participation roles and feedback functions on the platform that re-enforce a pro-social behaviour towards food waste.

Keywords

Engagement strategy Behavioural change  Food surplus distribution Food waste Digital social innovation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank all partners of the SavingFood consortium for the support and discussions that helped to develop this publication. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement nr 688221. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union.

References

  1. 1.
    Stenmarck, A., Jensen, C., Quested, T., Moates, G., Buksti, M., Cseh, B., Juul, S., Parry, A., Politano, A., Redlingshofer, B.: Estimates of European Food Waste Levels. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Östergren, K., Gustavsson, J., Bos-Brouwers, H., Timmermans, T., Hansen, O.J., Møller, H., Anderson, G., O’Connor, C., Soethoudt, H., Quested, T.: FUSIONS Definitional Framework for Food Waste. EU FUSIONS (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hertwich, E.: Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production: Priority Products and Materials. UNEP/Earthprint (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reynolds, C.J., Piantadosi, J., Boland, J.: Rescuing food from the organics waste stream to feed the food insecure: an economic and environmental assessment of Australian food rescue operations using environmentally extended waste input-output analysis. Sustainability 7, 4707–4726 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Butley, P.: Report reveals scale of food bank use in the UK (2017). http://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/may/29/report-reveals-scale-of-food-bank-use-in-the-uk-ifan
  7. 7.
    Riches, G.: Food banks and food security: welfare reform, human rights and social policy. Lessons from Canada? Soc. Policy Adm. 36, 648–663 (2002). Wiley Online LibraryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Parliament Council: A Community Strategy for Waste management (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Toolkit - Reducing the Food Wastage Footprint (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanssen, O.J., Ekegren, P., Gram-Hanssen, I., Korpela, P., Langevad-Clifforth, N., Skov-Olsen, K., Silvennoinen, K., Stare, M., Stenmarck, Å., Svanes, E.: Food Redistribution in the Nordic Region: Experiences and Results from a Pilot Study. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ùjhelyi, K., Cseh, B.: Hospitality Food Surplus Redistribution Guidelines. Hungarian Foodbank Association, Budapest (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneider, F.: The evolution of food donation with respect to waste prevention. Waste Manag. 33, 755–763 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caraher, M., Cavicchi, A.: Old crises on new plates or old plates for a new crises? Food banks and food insecurity. Br. Food J. 116 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Teron, A.C., Tarasuk, V.S.: Charitable food assistance: what are food bank users receiving? Can. J. Public Heal. Can. Santee Publique 90, 382–384 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoisington, A., Butkus, S.N., Garrett, S., Beerman, K.: Field gleaning as a tool for addressing food security at the local level: case study. J. Nutr. Educ. 33, 43–48 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Canali, M., Östergren, K., Amani, P., Aramyan, L., Sijtsema, S., Moates, G., Waldron, K., O’Connor, C.: Drivers of Current Food Waste Generation, Threats of Future Increase and Opportunities for Reduction. University of Bologna, Bologna (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buksti, M., Fremming, T., Juul, S., Grandjean, F., Christensen, S.: Surplus food redistribution systems. Feasibility final report (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Millard, J., Nielsen, N.C., Thaarup, R.K.: Report on the role of communities and networks in social innovation, and the role that online networking tools are playing. In: A Deliverable of the Project: The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe, Brussels (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tarasuk, V., Eakin, J.M.: Food assistance through “surplus” food: insights from an ethnographic study of food bank work. Agric. Hum. Values 22, 177–186 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    European Commission: EU Food Donation Guidelines. https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/food_waste/eu_actions/food-donation_en. Accessed 16 Oct 2017
  21. 21.
    Graham-Rowe, E., Jessop, D.C., Sparks, P.: Predicting household food waste reduction using an extended theory of planned behaviour. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 101, 194–202 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vanobberghen, W.: D2.1 conceptual and methodological framework V1. imec (2016). https://savingfood.eu/sfood-uploads/repository/D2.1-Conceptual-and-methodological-framework.v1_Final.pdf
  23. 23.
    Lee, N.R., Kotler, P.: Social Marketing: Changing Behaviors for Good. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bambust, F.: Effectief gedrag veranderen met het 7E-model - Politeia. Uitgeverij Politeia, Brussel (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McKenzie-Mohr, D.: Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. New Society Publishers (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carina Veeckman
    • 1
  • Wim Vanobberghen
    • 1
  • Eirini Kalemaki
    • 2
  • Vasia Madesi
    • 2
  • Alexander Theodoridis
    • 3
  1. 1.imec-SMIT-VUBBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.ViLabs Technopolis Thessalonikis Business ParkPylaia, ThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.BoroumeAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations