Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptable TV

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

  • 402 Accesses

Abstract

In this contemporary era of media convergence, every facet of the TV industry is adapting, from the ways in which shows are transmitted and consumed to the changing nature of the relationship between networks and the audiences they court. The cultural kudos of the medium as a purveyor of quality drama is on the rise. Part of this increasing kudos can be attributed to the emergence of a more innovative and boundary-pushing approach to the adaptation of pre-existing stories within the time-rich production context of TV’s long-form serial narrative, in a medium which is historically and industrially primed to embrace the art of adaptation as profitable industry practice. With particular reference to the serial narrative form, this chapter seeks to contextualise the process of adaptation within the parameters of TV production and consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jason Mittell defines these three distinct eras within an American context as: the classic network era of the mid-1940s to 1980s (ABC, CBS, NBC); the satellite, cable and the VCR multi-channel era of the 1990s; and the current era of media convergence (TV and American Culture 11).

Works Cited

  • Bevan, Alex, and Radha O’Meara. “Transmedia Theory’s Author Discourse and Its Limitations.” M/C Journal 21.1 (2018). Web. 10 Feb. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell, Sarah. Adaptation Revisited: Television and the Classic Novel. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalaby, Jean K. “Drama Without Drama: The Late Rise of Scripted TV Formats.” Television & New Media 17.1 (2015): 1–18. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creeber, Glen, and Matt Hills. “Editorial: TV III.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 5.1 (2007): 1–4. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fino, Dean. The HBO Effect. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Jonathan. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers and Other Media Paratexts. London and New York: New York University Press, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “TV Previews and the Meaning of Hype.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 11.1 (2008): 33–49. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. London: Routledge, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innocenti, Veronica, and Guglielmo Pescatore. “Changing Series: Narrative Models and the Role of the Viewer in Contemporary Television Seriality.” Between 4.8 (2014): 1–15. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenner, Mareike. “Is This TVIV? On Netflix, TVIII and Binge-Watching.” New Media and Society 18.2 (2016): 257–273. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kustritz, Anne. “Transmedia Serial Narration:Crossroads of Media, Story and Time.” M/C Journal 21.1 (2018). Web. 10 Feb. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz, Amanda D. “On ‘TV Criticism’: The Pursuit of the Critical Examination of a Popular Art.” Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture 6.1 (2008): 20–36. Web. 1 Nov. 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, Jason. Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling. New York and London: New York University Press, 2015. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Television and American Culture. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Narrative Complexity in Contemporary American Television.” The Velvet Light Trap 58 (2006): 29–40. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. “A Cultural Approach to Television Genre Theory.” Cinema Journal 40.3 (2001): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Michael Z, and Elana Levine. Legitimating Television Media Convergence and Cultural Studies. New York and Abingdon: Routledge, 2012. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. Barton “Continuation, Adaptation Studies, and the Never-Finished Text.” Adaptation in Visual Culture: Images, Texts, and Their Multiple Worlds. Eds. Julie Grossman and R. Barton Palmer. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 73–100. Print.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, Robert. “Beyond Fidelity: The Dialogics of Adaptation.” Film Adaptation. Ed. James Naremore. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2000. 54–78. Print.

    Google Scholar 

Screenography

Film

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvonne Griggs .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Griggs, Y. (2018). Introduction. In: Adaptable TV. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77531-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics