Abstract
Throughout the World War II, Sweden was not forced to engage in the armed conflict, although the state came close on many occasions. Several factors have contributed to this, including also Sweden’s active policy of neutrality. The policy was developed and implemented already before the war, and it was strengthened at the outset of the Nazi aggression. Apart from combat readiness in the form of conscripting consecutive draftees and increasing credits for military purposes, it also included changes in the country’s economy. The occupation of Denmark and Norway seriously worsened the situation as it cut Sweden off from the former western partners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Swedish Göteborgstrafiken (also named Lejdtrafiken) was the Swedish maritime trade during WWII through the port of Gothenburg. Following the occupation of Denmark and Norway, Sweden was cut off from trade with the western world, which caused shortages of raw materials (including those necessary to maintain the defense capabilities), inter alia, crude oil. Having found itself blockaded by both sides (the Third Reich on the one side and the United Kingdom on the other), Sweden was at risk of complete dependence on Nazi Germany. After laborious negotiations, Sweden was granted permission to resume limited commercial traffic, provided that the vessels were subject to control by the two belligerent sides. In addition, the number of trade passages in both directions had to be the same. A number of naval incidents took place: out of 79 vessels, which made 459 voyages, 10 were sunk. See: Areschoug (2008) and Hägglöf (1958).
- 2.
Milorg—(abbr. from Norwegian Militaer Organisasjonen) the Norwegian underground military organization from the time of WWII; see: Store norske leksikon, Norges historie fra 1940 til 1945.
- 3.
The speech given by K. Günther on May 4, 1945; compare: Andrén (1971, pp. 474ff).
- 4.
Statement on Foreign Policy to Parliament on 4 February 1948.
- 5.
Compare: Ur regeringsmeddelande den 4 februari 1948, [in:] Andrén and Landqvist (1965, pp. 97–101).
References
Agius, C. (2006). The social construction of Swedish neutrality. Challenges to Swedish identity and sovereignty. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Andrén, N. (1971). Svensk statskunskap. Stockholm.
Andrén, N., Landqvist, Å. (1965). Svensk utrikespolitik efter 1945. Stockholm.
Andrén, N., Moller, Y. (1990). Från Undén till Palme. Svensk utrikespolitik efter andra världskriget (From Undén to Palme. Swedish foreign policy after WW II Stockholm). Stockholm.
Areschoug, R. (2008). Dödlig resa–Svenska handelsflottans förluster 1939–1945. Stockholm: Svenskt Militärhistoriskt Bibliotek.
Åström, S. (1983). Sweden’s Policy of Neutrality. Stockholm.
Czarny, R. M. (2002). Szwecja w Unii Europejskiej. Studium polityczno-prawne. Kielce.
Gryz, J. (1996). Szwedzka polityka neutralności. Warszawa.
Hägglöf, G. (1958). Svensk krigshandelspolitik under andra världskriget. Stockholm: Norstedt.
Karlsson, B. (1995). Neutrality and Economy: The Redefining of Swedish Neutrality, 1946–52. Journal of Peace Research, 32 (1), SAGE Journals Online (published in association with International Peace Research Institute in Oslo).
Wahlbäck, K. (1984). Den svenska neutralitetens rötter. Stockholm, UD informerar, 1984: 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Czarny, R.M. (2018). End of War and Beginning of Peace. In: Sweden: From Neutrality to International Solidarity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77513-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77513-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77512-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77513-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)