Advertisement

On the Biased Partial Word Collector Problem

  • Philippe Duchon
  • Cyril Nicaud
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10807)

Abstract

In this article we consider the following question: N words of length L are generated using a biased memoryless source, i.e. each letter is taken independently according to some fixed distribution on the alphabet, and collected in a set (duplicates are removed); what are the frequencies of the letters in a typical element of this random set? We prove that the typical frequency distribution of such a word can be characterized by considering the parameter \(\ell = L/\log N\). We exhibit two thresholds \(\ell _0<\ell _1\) that only depend on the source, such that if \(\ell \le \ell _0\), the distribution resembles the uniform distribution; if \(\ell \ge \ell _1\) it resembles the distribution of the source; and for \(\ell _0\le \ell \le \ell _1\) we characterize the distribution as an interpolation of the two extremal distributions.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Arnaud Carayol for his precious help when preparing this article, and an anonymous reviewer for suggesting the promising alternative \(\alpha \)-parametrization of the problem.

References

  1. 1.
    Du Boisberranger, J., Gardy, D., Ponty, Y.: The weighted words collector. In: AOFA - 23rd International Meeting on Probabilistic, Combinatorial and Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis of Algorithms - 2012, pp. 243–264. DMTCS (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dubhashi, D., Ranjan, D.: Balls and bins: a study in negative dependence. Random Struct. Algorithms 13(2), 99–124 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duchon, P., Nicaud, C., Pivoteau, C.: Gapped pattern statistics. In: Kärkkäinen, J., Radoszewski, J., Rytter, W. (eds.) 28th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching, CPM 2017, 4–6 July 2017, Warsaw, Poland. LIPIcs, vol. 78, pp. 21:1–21:12. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gheorghiciuc, I., Ward, M.D.: On correlation polynomials and subword complexity. In: Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, DMTCS Proceedings, vol. AH, 2007 Conference on Analysis of Algorithms (AofA 07), January 2007Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacKay, D.J.: Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rubinchik, M., Shur, A.M.: The number of distinct subpalindromes in random words. Fundam. Inform. 145(3), 371–384 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Der Vaart, A.W., Wellner, J.A.: Weak convergence. In: Van Der Vaart, A.W., Wellner, J.A. (eds.) Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes, pp. 16–28. Springer, New York (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2545-2_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Bordeaux, LaBRI, UMR 5800TalenceFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, LaBRI, UMR 5800TalenceFrance
  3. 3.Université Paris-Est, LIGM (UMR 8049), CNRS, ENPC, ESIEE Paris, UPEMMarne-la-ValléeFrance

Personalised recommendations