The Impact of Manipulation on the Global Demand for Sport

  • Marcus Harms
  • Sebastian Kaiser-JovyEmail author


The purpose of this chapter is to provide, in an integrative manner, an overview of the status of research on the various impacts of manipulation on the global demand for sport. In particular, the effects of doping affairs, match fixing and corruption in professional sports on the demand for sport are considered. Although manipulation in sports and demand for sports are already extensively studied within the literature reviewed, how each of them is linked and how demand is affected by manipulation have been examined only very sparsely.


  1. Australian Crime Commission (ACC). (2013). Organised Crime and Drugs in Sport—New Generation Performance and Image Enhancing Drugs and Organised Criminal Involvement in Their Use in Professional Sport. Online:
  2. Borland, J. (2006). The Production of Professional Team Sports. In W. Andreff & S. Szymanski (Eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Sport (pp. 22–26). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Borland, J., & Macdonald, R. (2003). Demand for Sport. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 478–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bösing, J. (2014). Manipulationen im Sport und staatliche Sanktionsmöglichkeiten. Zur Notwendigkeit eines neuen Straftatbestandes gegen Bestechlichkeit und Bestechung im Sport. Marburg. Online:
  5. Breuer, M., & Kaiser, S. (2017). Match Fixing and Manipulation in Sport. In S. Frawley & N. Schulenkorf (Eds.), Critical Issues in Global Sport Management (pp. 64–76). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Buechel, B., Emrich, E., & Pohlkamp, S. (2016). Nobody’s Innocent—The Role of Customers in the Doping Dilemma. Journal of Sports Economics, 17(8), 767–789. Scholar
  7. Buraimo, B., & Simmons, R. (2008). Do Sports Fans Really Value Uncertainty of Outcome? Evidence from the English Premier League. International Journal of Sport Finance, 3(3), 146–155.Google Scholar
  8. Buraimo, B., Migali, G., & Simmons, R. (2016). An Analysis of Consumer Response to Corruption. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78(1), 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, K. (2012). Match-Fixing—The Biggest Threat to Sport in the 21st Century? Sweet & Maxwell’s International Sports Law Review, 2, 13–24.Google Scholar
  10. Cisyk, J., & Courty, P. (2015). Why It Is Necessary to Regulate Doping in Sports. VOX CEPR’s Policy Portal. Online:
  11. Cooper, H. M. (1982). Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research Reviews. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimant, E., & Deutscher, C. (2015). The Economics of Corruption in Sports: The Special Case of Doping. Harvard University—Center for Ethics. Online:
  13. Emrich, E., & Pierdzioch, C. (2015). Wettbewerbsverzerrungen im Sport. BISp-Jahrbuch Forschungsförderung 2013/14, Universität des Saarlandes. Online:
  14. Engelberg, T., Moston, S., & Skinner, J. (2011). Public Perception of Sport Anti-Doping Policy in Australia. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 19(1), 84–87.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2016). EU Work Plan for Sport 2014–2017—Expert Group on Match Fixing—State of Play on the Fight Against Match Fixing. Online:
  16. Feehan, P. (2006). Attendance at Sports Events. In W. Andreff & S. Szymanski (Eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Sport (pp. 90–99). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Forrest, D. (2012). The Threat to Football from Betting-Related Corruption. International Journal of Sport Finance, 7(2), 99–116.Google Scholar
  18. Forrest, D., McHale, I., & McAuley, K. (2008). “Say It Ain’t So”: Betting-Related Malpractice in Sport. International Journal of Sport Finance, 3(3), 156–166.Google Scholar
  19. Gorse, S., & Chadwick, S. (n.d.). The Prevalence of Corruption in International Sport—A Statistical Analysis. Online:
  20. Gratton, C., & Taylor, P. (2002). Economics of Sport and Recreation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Holden, J. T., & Rodenberg, R. M. (2015). The Sports Bribery Act: A Law and Economics Approach. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 42(3), 453–473.Google Scholar
  22. International Olympic Committee (IOC) & United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2013). Criminalization Approaches to Combat Match-Fixing and Illegal/Irregular Betting: A Global Perspective. Lausanne and Vienna. Online:
  23. KEA European Affairs. (2012). Match-Fixing in Sport—A Mapping of Criminal Law Provisions in EU 27. Online:
  24. Kew, F. (2003). Sport—Social Problems and Issues (Reprint). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  25. López Flórez, C. (2013). The Impact of the Doping Effect on Cycling Sponsorship: Analysis of Brand Lovers and Cycling Fans Consumer Reaction. Kassel. Online:é/WS_2013_2014/Lopez_expose_The-impact-of-the-doping-effect-on-cycling.pdf.
  26. Pawlowski, T., Nalbantis, G., & Coates, D. (2017). Perceived Game Uncertainty, Suspense and the Demand for Sport. Economic Inquiry. Scholar
  27. PwC. (2016). PwC’s Sport Survey 2016—Key Insights from Global Sports Leaders. Online:
  28. Simmons, R. (2006). The Demand for Spectator Sports. In W. Andreff & S. Szymanski (Eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Sport (pp. 77–89). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Solberg, H. A., Hanstad, D., & Thøring, T. A. (2010). Doping in Elite Sport—Do the Fans Care? Public Opinion on the Consequences of Doping Scandals. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 11(3), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Szymanski, S. (2003). The Assessment: The Economics of Sport. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4), 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taware, G. B., & Bansode, D. G. (2016). Doping in Sports. National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, 6(2), 89–92.Google Scholar
  32. The University of Adelaide. (2015). ‘Performance Enhancing’ Drugs Decrease Performance. Online:
  33. Transparency International. (2016a). Global Corruption Report: Sport. London and New York: Routledge. Online:
  34. Transparency International. (2016b). Global Corruption Report: Sport. Online:
  35. Transparency International Czech Republic. (2008). Why Sport Is Not Immune to Corruption. Online:
  36. Transparency International Switzerland. (2013). Korruption im Sport. Online:
  37. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne & International Centre for Sport Security (ICSS). (2014a). Sorbonne-ICSS Programme on Ethics and Sport Security—Report—Fighting Against the Manipulation of Sports Competitions—Part 1 Context and Forms of the Manipulation of Sports Competitions. Online:
  38. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne & International Centre for Sport Security (ICSS). (2014b). Protecting the Integrity of Sport Competition—The Last Bet for Modern Sport—An Executive Summary of the Sorbonne-ICSS Integrity Report Sport Integrity Research Programme, 2012–14. Online:
  39. Van Reeth, D. (2011). TV Demand for the Tour de France: The Importance of Stage Characteristics Versus Outcome Uncertainty, Patriotism and Doping. Online:

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EngineeringHeilbronn UniversityHeilbronnGermany

Personalised recommendations