Skip to main content

The Use of Forensic Statistics to Identify Corruption in Sport

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook on the Economics of Manipulation in Sport

Abstract

The world we live in has changed immeasurably during the last quarter of a century. The role computers have played as a catalyst for this change in modern society cannot be overstated. Soon after the advent of the Internet came social media, which was followed by the dawn of the so-called era of big data, and all of this has happened in less than half a century since Bill Gates and his friends were toying with transistors and capacitors in creating what would eventually become Microsoft and Apple. The era of big data has meant that in recent times, the status of statisticians, analysts and “quants” has been elevated to such heights that interrogating data is now a core activity of mega-corporations like Google and Facebook. Financial markets have long used analysts to help gain an edge over competitors and better build portfolios which balance returns and risk, and so it is no surprise that another type of financial market, the global market on sports betting, is also employing statistics to gain an edge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For those interested, Einmahl and Magnus suggest that 9.28 seconds is the ultimate time achievable for the 100 m.

  2. 2.

    Even when the purpose of a fix is not to make money on the betting market (and hence no money is pumped onto the market), the flow of knowledge about the fix to the market is difficult to avoid. In 2006, the Calciopoli scandal in Italian football saw clubs attempting to fix the results of matches for non-betting reasons—to win the league, for example, yet betting market “learnt” of the fixes because those who knew what was going on thought it was an opportunity to make some extra money by betting on the matches.

  3. 3.

    Boshnakov et al. (2017) use an alternative discrete distribution for modelling football scores, but the deviation from Poisson is relatively small.

  4. 4.

    In football, goals occurring in the extra minutes added to the end of the first and second halves of play are recorded as occurring in the 45th and 90th minutes, respectively.

  5. 5.

    The size of bet possible to place on the market is somewhat staggering. Traders suggest it would be possible to place bets of around $300,000 on matches in the Belgium Second Division without arousing suspicion.

  6. 6.

    In practice, the biggest fixes in terms of size of fraud take place in Asian markets which have the liquidity to support large bets. Fixes detected in Europe are typically less sophisticated and smaller scale in money terms and picked up by algorithms looking at volume, especially spatially concentrated volume.

References

  • Boshnakov, G., Kharrat, T., & McHale, I. G. (2017). A Bivariate Weibull Count Model for Forecasting Association Football Scores. International Journal of Forecasting, 33(2), 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buraimo, B., Migali, G., & Simmons, R. (2016). An Analysis of Consumer Response to Corruption: Italy’s Calciopoli Scandal. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78, 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. J., & Coles, S. G. (1997). Modelling Association Football Scores and Inefficiencies in the Football Betting Market. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 46(2), 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M., & Robinson, M. (1998). A Birth Process Model for Association Football Matches. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47, 523–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einmahl, J. H. J., & Magnus, J. R. (2008). Records in Athletics Through Extreme-Value Theory. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1382–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, D. (2012). The Threat to Football from Betting-Related Corruption. International Journal of Sport Finance, 7(2), 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, D., & McHale, I. G. (2015). An Evaluation of Sportradar’s Fraud Detection System. Commissioned Report. Available at https://integrity.sportradar.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2016/03/Sportradar-Security-Services_Univsersity-of-Liverpool_An-Evaluation-of-the-FDS.pdf.

  • Goddard, J. (2005). Regression Models for Forecasting Goals and Match Results in Association Football. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(2), 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., & Asimakopoulos, I. (2004). Forecasting Football Results and the Efficiency of Fixed-Odds Betting. Journal of Forecasting, 23, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, S., & Reade, J. (2014). On Fixing International Cricket Matches. Working Paper. Available at https://sites.google.com/site/jjamesreade/my-research/corruption-in-sport.

  • Maher, M. J. (1982). Modelling Association Football Scores. Statistica Neerlandica, 36(3), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, A. G., & Tawn, J. A. (2013). Determining the Best Track Performances of All Time Using a Conceptual Population Model for Athletics Records. Journal of Quanitiative Analysis in Sports, 9, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titman, A. C., Costain, D. A., Ridall, P. G., & Gregory, K. (2015). Joint Modelling of Goals and Bookings in Association Football. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 178, 659–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. V. (2005). Information Efficiency in Financial and Betting Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian G. McHale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McHale, I.G. (2018). The Use of Forensic Statistics to Identify Corruption in Sport. In: Breuer, M., Forrest, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook on the Economics of Manipulation in Sport. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77389-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77389-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77388-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77389-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics