Skip to main content

The Role of Moment Tensors in the Characterization of Hydraulic Stimulations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Moment Tensor Solutions

Part of the book series: Springer Natural Hazards ((SPRINGERNAT))

Abstract

Moment tensors are a useful tool to characterize different aspects about the mechanics of hydraulic stimulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aker E, Kuhn D, Vavryčuk V, Soldal M, Oye V (2014) Experimental investigation of acoustic emissions and their moment tensors in rock failure. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:286–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Aki K (1966) Generation and propagation of G waves from the Niigata earthquake of June 16, 1964. Part 2. Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress-strain drop from the G wave spectrum. Bull EarthQ Res Inst 44:73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett L, Le Calvez J, Sarver D, Tanner K, Birk W, Waters G, Drew J, Michaud G, Primiero P, Eisner L, Jones R, Leslie D, Williams M, Govenlock J, Klem R, Tezuka K (2005) The source for hydraulic fracture characterization. Oilfield Rev 17:42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennour Z, Ishida T, Nagaya Y, Chen Y, Nara Y, Chen Q, Sekine K, Nagano Y (2015) Crack extension in hydraulic fracturing of shale cores using viscous oil, water, and liquid carbon dioxide. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1463–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brune J (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman C, Leaney S (2012) A new moment-tensor decomposition for seismic events in anisotropic media. Geophys J Int 188:343–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuprakov D, Prioul R (2015) Hydraulic fracture height containment by weak horizontal interfaces. Paper presented at the SPE hydraulic fracture technology conference, The Woodlands, 3–5 Feb 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuprakov D, Akulich A, Siebrits E, Thiercelin M (2011) Hydraulic-fracture propagation in a naturally fractured reservoir. SPE Prod Oper 26:88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla C, Warpinski N, Mayerhofer M, Lolon E, Vincent M (2008) The relationship between fracture complexity, reservoir properties, and fracture treatment design. Paper presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, 21–24 Sept 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla C, Wright C (2002) Diagnostic techniques to understand hydraulic fracturing: what? why? and how? SPE Prod Facil 17:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke M, Underwood C (2001) Fracture termination and step-over at bedding interfaces due to frictional slip and interface opening. J Struct Geol 23:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy and Climate Change (2014) Fracking UK shale: understanding earthquake risk. http://m.northyorks.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=32806&p=0. Accessed 19 Jun 2017

  • Diller D, Shuck T, Fish B (2015) Estimation and interpretation of high-confidence microseismic source mechanisms. Lead Edge 34:918–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P, Eisner L (2010) Reservoir characterization using surface microseismic monitoring. Geophysics 75:75A139–75A146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economides M, Nolte K (eds) (2003) Reservoir stimulation. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink J (2013) Hydraulic fracturing chemicals and fluids technology. Gulf Publishing Company, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz-Allmann B, Goertz A, Wiemer S (2011) Stress drop variations of induced earthquakes at the Basel geothermal site. Geophys Res Lett 38:L09308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy H (2003) Acoustic emission microseismic activity, volume 1: principles, techniques and geotechnical applications. Taylor & Francis, Lisse

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson D, Aydin A (1991) Characteristics of joint propagation across layer interfaces in sedimentary rocks. J Struct Geol 13:897–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerner R, McCabe W, Lord A (1981) Overview of acoustic emission monitoring of rock structures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 14:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langenbruch C and Shapiro S (2014) Probability of brittle rock failure during hydraulic fracturing of conventional and unconventional reservoirs. In: SEG expanded abstracts, Denver, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaney S, Yu X, Chapman C, Bennett L, Maxwell S, Rutledge J, Duhault J (2014) Anisotropic moment tensor inversion and visualization applied to a dual well monitoring survey. CSEG Recorder 39:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga I, Kobayashi H, Sasaki S and Ishida T (1993) Studying hydraulic fracturing mechanisms by laboratory experiments with acoustic emission monitoring. Paper presented at the 34th US symposium on rock mechanics, ARMA, Madison, 28–30 June 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerhofer M, Lolon E, Warpinski N, Cipolla C, Walser D, Rightmire C (2010) What is stimulated reservoir volume? SPE Prod Oper 25:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell S, Rutledge J, Jones R, Fehler M (2010) Petroleum reservoir characterization using downhole microseismic monitoring. Geophysics 75:75A129–75A137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell S, Shemeta J, Campbell E and Quirk D (2008) Microseismic deformation rate monitoring. Paper presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, 21–24 Sept 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell S, Urbancic T, Le Calvez J, Tanner K, Grant W (2004) Passive seismic imaging of hydraulic fracture proppant placement. In: SEG Expanded Abstracts, Denver, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan J, Green S, Bai M (2008) Proppant placement during tight gas shale stimulation: literature review and speculation. Paper presented at the 42nd US symposium on rock mechanics, ARMA, San Francisco, 29 June–2 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus C, Ellison M, Telker C, Blair K (2014) Drainage estimation and proppant placement evaluation from microseismic data. Paper presented at the SPE/EAGE European unconventional resources conference and exhibition, Vienna, 25–27 Feb 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche V, van der Baan M (2015) The role of lithological layering and pore pressure on fluid-induced microseismicity. J Geophys Res 120:923–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge J, Phillips W (2003) Hydraulic stimulations of natural fracture as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage cotton valley gas field, east Texas. Geophysics 68:441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge J, Phillips W, Mayerhofer M (2004) Faulting induced by forced fluid injection and fluid flow forced by faulting: an interpretation of hydraulic-fracture microseismicity, Carthage cotton valley gas field, Texas. B Seismol Soc Am 94:1817–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge J, Downie R, Maxwell S, Drew J (2013) Geomechanics of hydraulic fracturing inferred from composite radiation patterns of microseismicity. Paper presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, 30 Sept–2 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge J, Yu X, Leaney S (2015) Microseismic shearing driven by hydraulic-fracture opening: an interpretation of source mechanism trends. Lead Edge 34:926–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge J, Weng X, Yu X, Chapman C, Leaney S (2016) Bedding-plane slip as a microseismic source during hydraulic fracturing. In: SEG expanded abstracts, Dallas, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S, Audigane P, Royer J (1999) Large-scale in situ permeability tensor of rocks from induced microseismicity. Geophys J Int 137:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sileny J, Hill D, Eisner L, Cornet F (2009) Non-double-couple mechanisms of microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing. J Geophys Res 114:B08307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanchits S, Burghardt J, Surdi A (2015) Hydraulic fracturing of heterogeneous rock monitored by acoustic emission. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:2513–2527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0848-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanek F, Eisner L (2013) New model explaining inverted source mechanisms of microseismic events induced by hydraulic fracturing. In: SEG expanded abstracts, Houston, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Engelder T (2016) Further testing of the bedding-plane-slip model for hydraulic-fracture opening using moment-tensor inversions. Geophysics 81:KS159–KS168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbancic T, Rutledge J (2000) Using microseismicity to map Cotton Valley hydraulic fractures. In: SEG expanded abstracts, Calgary, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavryčuk V (2011) Tensile earthquakes: theory, modelling and inversion. J Geophys Res 116:B12320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavryčuk V (2015) Moment tensor decompositions revisited. J Seismol 19:231–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera Rodriguez I, Stanchits S, Burghardt J (2017) Data-driven, in-situ, relative sensor calibration based on waveform fitting moment tensor inversion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:891–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Rutledge J, Leaney S, Sun J, Pankaj P, Weng X, Onda H, Donovan M, Nielsen J, Duhault J (2015) Integration of microseismic data and an unconventional fracture modeling tool to generate the hydraulically induced fracture network: a case study from the cardium formation. West Central Alberta, Canada. Paper presented at the unconventional resources technology conference (URTeC), San Antonio, 20–22 July 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Jeffrey R (2008) Reinitiation or termination of fluid-driven fractures at frictional bedding interfaces. J Geophys Res 113:B08416

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoback M, Rummel F, Jung R, Raleigh C (1977) Laboratory hydraulic fracturing experiments in intact and pre-fractured rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 14:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Phil Christie, Chris Chapman, Gwenola Michaud and Michael Williams for useful comments that helped improve the presentation of this chapter. We are also grateful to Devon Energy Corporation for granting permission to publish the Barnett data results and Schlumberger for permission for the publication of the laboratory data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismael Vera Rodriguez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vera Rodriguez, I., Rutledge, J., Stanchits, S. (2018). The Role of Moment Tensors in the Characterization of Hydraulic Stimulations. In: D'Amico, S. (eds) Moment Tensor Solutions. Springer Natural Hazards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77359-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics