Skip to main content

Embedding an Everyday Culture of Creativity: Making Creativity Work in a University Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity at Work

Abstract

Universities are often thought of as creative institutions that promote idea generation, learning, and new and valuable thinking. However, the dominant mode of neoliberal economic rationality in the UK, with its increasing emphasis on student numbers, league tables, assessment, and performance, casts such perceived wisdom in doubt. Against this backdrop, in this chapter, we report on an “innovation project” that was undertaken during 2015–2016 within a UK-based university, which had the aim of embedding a sustainable “everyday culture of creativity” through trialling a programme of creative interventions. Our findings explore challenges encountered, including the dilemma of fostering creativity while not allowing it to become instrumentalized for goal-driven purposes. We highlight the significance of freedom, trust/permission, risk-taking, and communication as creativity enablers. The chapter concludes with key recommendations for “making creativity work” in a university setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. New York: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1998, September). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Ballmoor, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartell, M. (2003). Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework. Higher Education, 45, 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, M., & Woodgates, P. (2015). Lagging behind: Are UK universities falling behind in the global innovation race? London: PA Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2001). Little c creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 45–61). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A., & Jeffrey, B. (2008). Creativity and performativity in teaching and learning: tensions, dilemmas, constraints, accommodations and synthesis. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 577–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribb, A., & Gewirtz, S. (2013). The hollowed-out university? A critical analysis of changing institutional and academic norms in UK higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 338–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1995). Is your creative organisation innovative? In C. Ford, & D. Gioia (Eds.), Creative action in organizations: Ivory tower visions and real world voices. (Chapter 15) London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organisational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 5, 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M., & Nouri, R. (2010). Creativity: The influence of cultural, social and work contexts. Management and Organization Review, 6, 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1948). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18, 108–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Gunter, B. (1993). Corporate assessment. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M., Hisae Nishii, L., & Raver, J. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1225–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, S., & Ekvall, G. (2015). Conceptual and historical foundations of the situational outlook questionnaire. The creativity problem solving group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J., Van Den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environ- mental moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. (2012). Discourse and creativity. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (2015). Control by numbers: New managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 56, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K., Grummell, B., & Devine, D. (2012). New managerialism in education: Commercialization, carelessness and gender. Chippenham, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6, 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellou, E. (1996). The two-conditions view of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 126–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micklem, D., & Hunter, J. (2016). Everyday creativity. London: 64 Million Artists for Arts Council England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2006). Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of consumerism in higher education, Journal of Educational Policy, 20, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J. (2004). Education for the good society: The integrity of academic practice. London Review of Education, 2, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, S., & Shreeve, A. (2017). Art and design pedagogy in Higher Education: Knowledge, values and ambiguity in the creative curriculum. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives. Washington, MD: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., & Stern, S. (1997). Corporate creativity: How innovation and improvements happen. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., & Kwapil, T. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoski, J. (1994). Token professionals and master critics: A critique of orthodoxy in literary studies. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S., Birch, K., & MacLeavy, J. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of neoliberalism. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statler, M., Roos, J., & Victor, B. (2009). “Ain’t misbehavin”: Taking play seriously in organizations. Journal of Change Management, 9, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D., & Wilson, N. (2017). Small business management & entrepreneurship. Andover: Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, S., Austerlitz, N., Blythman, M., Grove-White, A., Jones, B., Jones, C., et al. (2008). Mind the gap: Expectations, ambiguity and pedagogy within art and design higher education. In L. Drew (Ed.), The student experience in art and design higher education: Drivers for change (pp. 125–148). Cambridge, MA: Jill Rogers Associates Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N. (2010). Social creativity: Requalifying the creative economy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16, 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N., & Gross, J. (2017). Caring for cultural freedom: An ecological approach to supporting young people’s cultural learning. London, UK: A New Direction (AND).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N., Gross, J., & Bull, A. (2017). Towards cultural democracy: Promoting cultural capabilities for everyone. London: King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N., Speers, L., Hunter, J. & Micklem, D. (2014). 53 million artists: Final research report [and white paper], for Cultural Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenasni, F., Besancon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The University and those directly involved in this innovation project have been anonymized. We are grateful to the project team, in particular, who provided valuable insights relating to the issues discussed in this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Speers, L., Wilson, N. (2018). Embedding an Everyday Culture of Creativity: Making Creativity Work in a University Context. In: Martin, L., Wilson, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77350-6_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics