Abstract
This chapter aims to guide the reader in the analysis of some of the main themes proposed by the debate related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). First, we discuss the impact of the 4IR on employment by reviewing the results of the relevant economic literature, drawing some suggestions for future research. Second, we review some of the policies developed by governments to support the digital revolution. We argue that while Industry 4.0-type policies are common to all advanced countries, policies in favour of digital technologies in the service sector are more fragmented, difficult to implement, and face a stronger resistance from workers. We finish the paper with a discussion of the main policy issues related to the workers and the labour market, with a focus on robot tax, shared robot ownership, and universal basic income. We conclude by emphasizing that while policies in favour of machines are widespread and supported by wide social consensus, effective polices in favour of workers are much weaker and still unable to mitigate the negative effects of the digital revolution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The first was characterized by mechanical production facilities and began in Britain in the 1780s with the help of water and steam power. The second introduced and developed mass production with the help of electrical energy, particularly in the early twentieth century. The third began in the 1970s and was characterized by the use of electronic and IT systems that further automated production.
- 2.
The term Industrie 4.0 was used for the first time during the 2011 Hannover Fair (Schwab 2016).
- 3.
Our computation based on EU-KLEMS, OECD-STAN and BLS data.
- 4.
An industrial robot can be defined as “an automatically controlled, reprogrammable, multipurpose manipulator programmable in three or more axes, which can be either fixed in place or mobile for use in industrial automation applications” (IFR 2017, p. 32).
- 5.
Also, “smart” is very popular. It is so popular that recently the EU, with perhaps excessive emphasis, labelled a programme Smart Anything Everywhere (SAE)!
- 6.
A recent survey can be found in European Commission (2017).
References
Abbott, Ryan and Bret N. Bogenschneider. 2018. Should Robots Pay Taxes? Tax Policy in the Age of Automation, Harvard Law & Policy Review, 12:1. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2932483. Accessed 11 Feb 2018.
Acemoglu, Daron, and David H. Autor. 2011. Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. In Handbook of Labor Economics 4, part B:1043–1171. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Acemoglu, Daron, and Pascual Restrepo. 2017. Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. NBER Working Paper 23285.
Arnold, Chris. 2017. Tax Bill Favors Adding Robots Over Workers, Critics Say. National Public Radio Inc. (US), December 8, 2017, 5:01 PM ET. https://www.npr.org/2017/12/08/569118310/tax-bill-favors-adding-robots-over-workers-critics-say. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Arntz, Melanie, Gregory, Terry and U. Zierahn. 2016. The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper 189.
Autor, David H. 2015. Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 3–30.
Autor, David H., and David Dorn. 2013. The Growth of Low-skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of US Labor Market. American Economic Review 103 (5): 1553–1557.
Beckett, Andy. 2018. Post-work: The Radical Idea of a World Without Jobs, The Guardian, 19 Jan 2018.
Berg, Andrew, Edward F. Buffie, and Luis-Felipe Zanna. 2016. Robots, Growth, and Inequality. IMF Finance & Development, September, 53:3.
Berriman, Richard, and John Hawksworth. 2017. Will Robots Steal Our Jobs? The Potential Impact of Automation on the UK and Other Major Economies. UK Economic Outlook, March 2017.
Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2011. Race Against the Machine. How the Digital Revolution Is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington: Digital Frontier Press.
Colin, Nicolas, and Bruno Palier. 2015. The Next Safety Net. Social Policy for a Digital Age. Foreign Affairs 94: 4.
Council of Europe. Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development. 2018. The Case for a Basic Citizenship Income. DOC 14462. 5 Jan 2018.
Dauth, Wolfgang, Sebastian Findeisen, Jens Südekum, and Nicole Woessner. 2017. German Robots – The Impact of Industrial Robots on Workers. CEPR Discussion Paper 12306. http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=12306. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Delany, Kevin. 2017. The Robot That Takes Your Job Should Pay Taxes, Says Bill Gates Quartz, February 17. https://qz.com/911968/bill-gates-the-robot-that-takes-your-job-should-pay-taxes/. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
European Commission. 2017. Digital Transformation Monitor, National Initiatives. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/toolsdatabases/dem/monitor/category/national-initiatives. Accessed 12 April 2018.
The European House-Ambrosetti. 2017. Technology and Labour: Steering the Change. Milan: The European House-Ambrosetti. https://www.ambrosetti.eu/wp-content/uploads/Ambrosetti-Club-2017. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
European Parliament. Committee on Legal Affairs. 2017. Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Rapporteur: Mady Delvaux. 27 January 2017. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A8-2017-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
The Federal Government. 2014. Speech by the Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel to the OECD Conference, 19 February 2014. https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/EN/Reden/2014/2014-02-19-oecd-merkel-paris_en.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Freeman, Richard B. 2015. Who Owns the Robots Rules the World. IZA World of Labor. http://wol.iza.org/articles/who-owns-the-robots-rules-the-world. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Frey, Carl B., and Michael A. Osborne, 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerization? Oxford Martin Programme on The Impact of Future Technologies, University of Oxford. Revised in Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. 114:254–280.
Goodkind, Nicole. 2017. Trump Tax Plan Gives Jobs Away to Robots and Will Increase Unemployment. 15 November 2017. http://www.newsweek.com/tax-plan-robots-jobs-senate-republicans-712930. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Graetz, Georg, and Guy Michaels. 2015. Robots at Work. CEPR Discussion paper 10477. https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=10477. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Gregory, Terry, Anna Salomons, and Zierahn Ultich. 2016. Racing With or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe. ZEW Discussion Paper 16-053. http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp16053.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Guerreiro, Joao, Sergio Rebelo, and Pedro Teles. 2017. Should Robots Be Taxed?. NBER Working Paper 23806, September 2017, Revised January 2018. http://www.nber.org/papers/w23806. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Intereconomics. 2017. Universal Basic Income: The Promise vs. the Practicalities 52, March/April, No 2.
International Federation of Robotics. 2017. Executive Summary World Robotics 2017 Industrial Robots. https://ifr.org/downloads/press/Executive_Summary_WR_2017_Industrial_Robots.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Kagermann, Henning, Wolfgang Wahlster, and Johannes Helbig. 2013. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, April 2013. Acatech, Deutsche Akademie der Technikswissenschaften. http://www.acatech.de/de/publikationen/stellungnahmen/kooperationen/detail/artikel/recommendations-for-implementing-the-strategic-initiative-industrie-40-final-report-of-the-industr.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Keynes, John M. 1963. Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren, Essays in Persuasion, 358–373 (I ed. 1930). New York: W.W Norton and Co.
McAfee, Andrew, and Erik Brynjolfsson. 2016. Human Work in the Robotic Future. Policy for the Age of Automation. Foreign Affairs, 95:4, July/August.
Meyer, Henning. 2016. Inequality in the Second Machine Age. The Need for a Social Democratic Digital Society. Juncture (IPPR Progressive Review) 23: 2.
Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico – MISE. 2017. Piano Nazionale Industria 4.0, Roma.
Mokyr, Joel, Chris Vickers, and Nicolas Ziebarth. 2015. The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different? Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3).
OECD. 2016. Enabling the Next Production Revolution. The Future of Manufacturing and Services – Interim Report. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, 1–2 June 2016. https://www.oecd.org/mcm/documents/Enabling-the-next-production-revolution-the-future-of-manufacturing-and-services-interim-report.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
———. 2017.The Next Production Revolution: Implications for Governments and Business. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264271036-en. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Rodrik, Dany. 2015. Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science. New York: W.W. Norton.
Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Shiller, Robert J. 2017. Narrative Economics. American Economic Review 107 (4): 967–1004.
Standing, Guy. 2017. Basic Income: And How We Can Make It Happen. London: Pelican.
Summers, Lawrence. 2017. Robots Are Wealth Creators and Taxing Them Is Illogical. Financial Times, 5 March 2017. https://www.ft.com/content/42ab292a-000d-11e7-8d8e-a5e3738f9ae4. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.
U.K. Government. Office for Science. 2013. The Future of Manufacturing: A new era of opportunity and challenge for the UK. Project Report. London: U.K. Government. Office for Science. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/255922/13-809-future-manufacturing-project-report.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.
UNIDO, University of Cambridge, IfM. 2017. Emerging Trends in Global Advanced Manufacturing: Challenges, Opportunities and Policy Responses. Cambridge: Institute for Manufacturing. https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploads/Resources/Reports/UNIDO_FINAL_VERSION.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.
Van Parijs, Philippe, and Yannick Vanderborght. 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
World Economic Forum. 2016. The Future of Jobs. Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, January 2016. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paba, S., Solinas, G. (2018). In Favour of Machines (But Not Forgetting the Workers): Some Considerations on the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In: Ales, E., Curzi, Y., Fabbri, T., Rymkevich, O., Senatori, I., Solinas, G. (eds) Working in Digital and Smart Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77329-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77329-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77328-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77329-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)