Skip to main content

Into Smart Work Practices: Which Challenges for the HR Department?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This work investigates the implementation within organizational contexts of smart working (SW) focusing on the role played by the HR department. After the presentation of the topic, some theoretical elements necessary to understand the research are introduced and some principal characteristics of the qualitative research from the methodological point of view are summarized. After that, the paper focuses on some key findings showing how the enterprises are related to SW and how their HR departments are supporting each step of the whole process. There are some final considerations on the evolution of the role of this department in the perspective of an increasing space for flexible arrangements in working conditions, which can contribute to a positive and fruitful introduction and reinforcement of SW practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahuja, Manju K., Katherine M. Chudoba, Charles J. Kacmar, D. Harrison McKnight, and Joey F. George. 2007. IT Road Warriors: Balancing Work-Family Conflict, Job Autonomy, and Work Overload to Mitigate Turnover Intentions. MIS Quarterly 31 (1): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, Julian. 2010. Reinventing Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, Julian, Garry Hamel, and Michel Mol. 2008. Management Innovation. Academy of Management Review 33 (4): 825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorsma, Bas, R. Bulchandani, C. Jr. Gerard, Peter Drury, Philip Grone, Tony Kim, Shane Mitchell, Michelle N.D. Slinger, and Patrick Spencer. 2011. Work-Life Innovation, Smart Work—A Paradigm Shift Transforming: How, Where, and When Work Gets Done. San Jose: Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG). Retrieved April 30, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Ann M. 2000. Work Design for Flexible Work Scheduling: Barriers and Gender Implications. Gender, Work & Organization 7 (1): 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockbank, Wayne, and Dave Ulrich. 2009. The HR Business-Partner Model: Past Learnings and Future Challenge. People & Strategy 2 (2): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Esther, and Mike Green. 2015. Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide to the Models Tools and Techniques of Organisational Change. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development. 2008. Smart Working. The Impact of Work Organisation and Job Design, Research Insight. CIPD, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. HR: Getting Smart About Agile Working, Impact of Work Organisation and Job Design, Research Report. CIPD, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Leida, and Ravi Nath. 2008. A Socio-Technical Perspective of Mobile Work. Information Knowledge Systems Management 7 (1): 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaro, Gianluigi, Giacomo Prati, and Matteo Zocca. 2015. Smart Working: dal lavoro flessibile al lavoro agile. Sociologia del lavoro 138: 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Kok, Arjan. 2016. The New Way of Working: Bricks, Bytes, and Behavior. In The Impact of ICT on Work, ed. Jungwoo Lee, 9–40. Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, Jane E., and Robert B. Duncan. 1987. The Creation of Momentum for Change Through the Process of Strategic Issue Diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal 8 (3): 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. Building Theory from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Journal 14 (4): 532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, Kimberly D., and Michael G. Pratt. 2007. The Physical Environment in Organizations. The Academy of Management Annals 1 (1): 181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Fred E. 1990. Characteristics of Socio-Technical Systems. In The Social Engagement of Social Science, ed. Eric E. Trist and Hugh E. Murray, vol. 2, 177–208. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Employers Network for Equality and Inclusion-ENEI. 2014. Agile Working, a Guide for Employers, Report. ENEI, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran, Ravi S., and David A. Harrison. 2007. The Good, the Bad and the Unknown About Telecommuting: Meta-analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (6): 1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastaldi, Luca, Mariano Corso, Elisabetta Raguseo, Paolo Neirotti, Emilio Paolucci, and Antonella Martini. 2014. Smart Working: Rethinking Work Practices to Leverage Employees’ Innovation Potential. In 15th International Continuous Innovation Network (CINet) Conference Operating Innovation–Innovating Operations 337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, Charles E. 2000. The Future of Work: The Promise of the New Digital Work Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, Gary. 2007. The Future of Management. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, Asher, Morris Goldsmith, and Ainat Pansky. 2000. Toward a Psychology of Memory Accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology 51 (2): 481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jungwoo. 2013. Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge: Desperate Call from Business Enterprises in Coming Smart Working Era. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19 (1): S285.5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, Dorothy. 1990. A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites. Organisation Science 1 (3): 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, Paul M. 2011. When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, Ronald, and G. Lippitt. 1975. Consulting Process in Action 1. Training and Development Journal 29 (5): 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. 1981. Footnotes to Organizational Change. Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Sanches, Angel, Manulea Pérez Pérez, Carnicer Pilar de Luis, and Maira Josè Vela Jimenez. 2007. Teleworking and Workplace Flexibility: A Study of Impact on Firm Performance. Personnel Review 36 (1): 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucchelli, S. 2014. Lo Smart Working Come Benefit: pratiche innovative di welfare aziendale, in: Welfare aziendale. La risposta organizzativa ai bisogni delle persone. I Quaderni di Sviluppo & Organizzazione 20: 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNall, Laurel A., Aine D. Masuda, and Jessica M. Nickin. 2010. Flexible Work Arrangements, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Role of Work-to-Family Enrichment. The Journal of Psychology 144 (1): 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan, Pinar, and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. 2009. Origin of Alliance Portfolios: Entrepreneurs, Network Strategies, and Firm Performance. Academy of Management Journal 52 (2): 246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politecnico di Milano. 2012. Smart Working: ripensare il lavoro, liberare energia, Rapporto 2012. Osservatorio Smart Working. Milano: Politecnico di Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Smart Working: scopriamo le carte!, Rapporto Osservatorio Smart Working. Milano: Politecnico di Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. (Smart) Work in Progress, Materials Presented at the Conference on Smart Working, Octobre 12 ottobre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1995. Lessons for Guidelines from the Diffusion of Innovations. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 21 (7): 324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarti, Daria, and Teresina Torre. 2017. Is Smart Working a Win-Win Solution? First Evidence from the Field. In Well-being at and Through Work, ed. Tindara Addabbo, Edoardo Ales, Ylenia Curzi, and Iacopo Senatori, 231–251. Torino: Giappichelli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgar H. 1969. Process Consultation: Its Role in Organization Development. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, Donald A. 1963. Champions for Radical New Inventions. Harvard Business Review 41 (March–April): 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scornavacca, Eusebio. 2014. Incorporating System Portability into Technology Acceptance Models. Paper presented at the International Conference in Mobile Business-ICMB. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icmb2014/10.

  • Tagliaro, Chiara, and Andrea Ciaramella. 2016. Experiencing Smart Working: A Case Study on Workplace Change Management in Italy. Journal of Corporate Real Estate 18 (3): 194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telsyte. 2015. Activity Based Working Is Driving, Whitepaper. Telsyte, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Dave. 1997. Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Dave, and Dick Beatty. 2001. From Partners to Players: Extending the HR Playing Field. Human Resource Management 40 (4): 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Dave, and Wayne Brockbank. 2005. The HR Value Proposition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Dave, and Joe Grochowski. 2012. From Shared Services to Professional Services. Strategic Human Resource Review 11 (3): 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlaar, Paul W.L., Paul C. van Fenema, and Vinay Tiwari. 2008. Cocreating Understanding and Value in Distribuited Work: How Members of Outside and Offshore Vendor Team Give, Make, Demand and Break Sense. MIS Quarterly 32 (2): 227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynekoop, Judy L., and James A. Senn. 1992. CASE Implementation: The Importance of Multiple Perspectives. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Research Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, Gerald, Robert Duncan, and Jonny Holbeck. 1973. Innovativeness and Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresina Torre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Interview Questions for HR Managers

SW: Reasons/Objectives and Results

  • Main reasons that lead (at the beginning) to invest in SW initiative. Main benefits expected from SW.

  • Year of beginning to think about SW implementation.

  • Year of implementation of first initiatives on SW.

  • After how much time did you see first results? What was the first result observed? Was it among your expectations that result and that level of result? Unexpected positive results?

  • Today level of achievement of previous stated objectives/benefits?

  • Current percentage of smart workers related to the whole workforce. How was it at the beginning? What is your final target and how much time you planned to reach it?

  • What is needed in your organization in order to have success with mobile workers? (this includes technical, managerial, organizational and cultural issues)*.

* Chen and Nath (2008, p. 45)

Idea, Implementation and Actors/Functions Involved

  • Who had the idea ? Who followed and implemented it (instrument inter-functional team, one function/department)? Functions involved (at different stage) or different stakeholders (unions)?

  • What was the role of CEO in all this? (from the very beginning he or she was the initiator, he or she immediately approved and sponsored the idea when communicated by the one who wanted first to promote it, it took a little bit of effort to convince CEO …).

  • What was the role of Middle management in all this?

  • What was the role of Line in all of this?

  • What was the role of HR department?

  • What was the role of other important actors (e.g. trade unions)?

Main Obstacles and Concerns

  • Individuals’ perspective—What are the main concerns of mobile workers (e.g. technology-related concerns, work related concerns, time committed concerns, expectations to be reachable anytime anywhere etc.)*.

  • Technological perspective—What are the main technical issues your organization faces in supporting mobile workers (e.g. security, bandwidth and connectivity)? How are they addressed?*.

  • Social perspective—Has the proliferation of mobile workforce raised any significant issues between the worker and his or her supervisor(s)?*

* Chen and Nath (2008, p. 45)

Smart Workers and Job Design

  • What different types of mobile workers are supported?*.

  • What are the specific tasks being supported (e.g. virtual team work, remote access form the field etc.)?*.

  • What changes in the level of each job responsibility and goals, number and kind of tasks , formalization and training?

  • What changes in the level of goal definition, control and supervision, assessment and reward?

  • Are there diversity issues? Gender, age, tenure etc.

* Chen and Nath (2008, p. 45)

Investments Made in Different Organizational Systems

Field

 

Reference

HR

Change management actions implemented in the organization:

1. Training for the middle and top management

2. Training for the end users

3. Communication plans

4. New MBO systems

5. Projects of cultural changes

6. Processes’ reorganization

De Kok (2016)

Space organization and layout

Redesign of the workspaces, supporting a different work organization

Elsbach and Pratt (2007)

ICT

Extent to which employees telework (% teleworkers and time per week)

Martinez-Sanchez et al. (2007)

Extent to which employees use ICT personal devices (PC, tablet etc.)

Extent to which employees use external ICT services (e.g. Skype, Twitter) at any time from an place

Corporate Level Policies (Managerial Systems)

  • Does your organization have any formal process by which mobile workers receive appropriate training (both technology related and non-technical such as work –life balance, danger, antisocial behaviours , distraction)*.

  • Is the way workers are evaluated and rewarded changed?

  • How do you measure success for your mobile work programme (e.g. efficiency, effectiveness, retention, job satisfaction, ROI etc.)*.

* Chen and Nath (2008, p. 45)

Culture and Top Management Support

  • Do you think that your organization’s culture is conductive of effective mobile work? How was it improved? How can it be improved?*

* Chen and Nath (2008, p. 45)

Interview Questions for SW Responsible in Charge

  • When do you hear anything about SW for the first time? Do you agree with the decision to introduce SW in your enterprise?

  • Which is personal your experience with SW?

  • How much freedom do you have in using SW for your colleagues?

  • Which are the most relevant problems you met with? Which the most significant benefits?

  • Which kind of support do you ask for managing SW?

  • Are you satisfied with SW experiences?

  • What do you ask to HR department for a better use of SW?

  • Are you ready to manage smart workers? What competences do you need to develop?

  • What are you interested in learning about SW?

  • What do you think is the future of SW? in your unit?

Interview Questions for to Trade Unionists

  • Which was trade unions role in SW decisions?

  • What do you think about SW in your enterprise?

  • Which benefits? Which problems?

  • How do workers accept SW? Which is you role in favouring SW introduction?

  • Is SW sufficiently supported in your enterprise? Which role did HR department play?

  • How strong has the Top management support been?

  • Which future for industrial relationships?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Torre, T., Sarti, D. (2018). Into Smart Work Practices: Which Challenges for the HR Department?. In: Ales, E., Curzi, Y., Fabbri, T., Rymkevich, O., Senatori, I., Solinas, G. (eds) Working in Digital and Smart Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77329-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics