Advertisement

Conclusion

Chapter
  • 361 Downloads

Abstract

The final chapter outlines the experience and lessons learned from past global disaster relief operations. The evidence presented in this book clearly suggests that disaster relief actors either have not learned from the past experience or new knowledge is short-lived. As a result, no noticeable progress has been observed in the quality of disaster efforts administered in recent decades. After listing several important events that occurred in disaster relief arena to foster coordination and cooperation among many national and international actors involved in emergency relief efforts, this chapter focuses on problems and challenges confronted by past relief operations. Based on these challenges, recommendations are made to improve future disaster relief efforts. Finally, research gaps in disaster relief operations are identified and future research should pursue to fill these gaps.

Keywords

Complexities Timely interventions Challenges and problems Unbiased relief distribution Local knowledge Public education and awareness Coordination and communication Research gaps Small island developing states (SIDS) 

References

  1. Ahmed, M., A. Capistrano, and M. Hossain. 1997. Experience of Partnership Models for the Co-management of Bangladesh Fisheries. Fish Management Ecology 4: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnette, A.N., and C.W. Zobel. 2016. Investigation of Material Convergence in the September 2013 Colorado Floods. Natural Hazards Review 17 (2): 05016001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balcik, B., B.M. Beamon, C. Krejci, and M. Ramirez. 2010. Coordination in Humanitarian Relief Chains: Practices, Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics 126 (1): 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Flint, M., and H. Goyder. 2006. Funding the Tsunami Response. London: Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.Google Scholar
  5. Hebblethwaite, B. 2011. Haiti Earthquake (2010). In Encyclopedia of Disaster Relief, ed. K.B. Penuel and M. Statler, 258–262. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Henry, D. 2005. Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Disasters. In Disciplines, Disasters and Emergency Management: The Convergence and Divergence of Concepts, Issues and Trends from the Research Literature, ed. D. McEntire and W. Blanchard. Emittsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://training.fema.gov/emiweb/edu/ddemtextbook.asp. Last Accessed 23 Nov 2017.
  7. IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies). 2000. Improving Coordination. Geneva: IFRC.Google Scholar
  8. IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies). 2013. World Disasters Report: Focus on Technology and the Future of Humanitarian Action. Geneva: IFRC.Google Scholar
  9. Islam, R., and G. Walkerden. 2015. How do Links Between Households and NGOs Promote Disaster Resilience and Recovery? A Case Study of Linking Social Networks on the Bangladesh Coast. Natural Hazards 78 (3): 1707–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ito, H., W. Wisetjindawat, and M. Yokomatsu. 2014. Improving the Operational Efficiency of Humanitarian Logistics in the Aftermath of a Large-Scale Disaster. Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management 4 (2): 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kent, R.C. 1987. Anatomy of Disaster Relief: The International Network in Action. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Kirsch, T.D., P. Perrin, F.M. Burkle, W. Canny, S. Purdin, W. Len, and L. Sauer. 2012. Requirements for Independent Community-Based Quality Assessment and Accountability Practices in Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Activities. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 27 (3): 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mulyono, N.B., and Y. Ishida. 2014. Humanitarian Logistics and Inventory Model Based on Probabilistic Cellular Automata. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information, and Control 10 (1): 357–372.Google Scholar
  14. Paul, B.K., B. Acharya, and K. Ghimire. 2017. Effectiveness of Earthquakes Relief Efforts in Nepal: Opinions of the Survivors. Natural Hazard 85 (2017): 1169–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prendergast, J. 1996. Frontline Diplomacy: Humanitarian Aid and Conflict in Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  16. Putnam, R.D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rey, F. 2001. The Complex Nature of Actors in Humanitarian Action and the Challenge of Coordination. In Reflections on Humanitarian Action: Principles, Ethics and Contradictions, ed. Humanitarian Studies Unit. London: TNI/Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, G., A. Stoddard, A. Harmer, K. Haver, and P. Harvey. 2012. The State of the Humanitarian System (2012 Edition). London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  19. USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development). 2002. Mozambique Flood Resettlement Grant Activity. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations