The final chapter outlines the experience and lessons learned from past global disaster relief operations. The evidence presented in this book clearly suggests that disaster relief actors either have not learned from the past experience or new knowledge is short-lived. As a result, no noticeable progress has been observed in the quality of disaster efforts administered in recent decades. After listing several important events that occurred in disaster relief arena to foster coordination and cooperation among many national and international actors involved in emergency relief efforts, this chapter focuses on problems and challenges confronted by past relief operations. Based on these challenges, recommendations are made to improve future disaster relief efforts. Finally, research gaps in disaster relief operations are identified and future research should pursue to fill these gaps.
KeywordsComplexities Timely interventions Challenges and problems Unbiased relief distribution Local knowledge Public education and awareness Coordination and communication Research gaps Small island developing states (SIDS)
- Flint, M., and H. Goyder. 2006. Funding the Tsunami Response. London: Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.Google Scholar
- Hebblethwaite, B. 2011. Haiti Earthquake (2010). In Encyclopedia of Disaster Relief, ed. K.B. Penuel and M. Statler, 258–262. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Henry, D. 2005. Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Disasters. In Disciplines, Disasters and Emergency Management: The Convergence and Divergence of Concepts, Issues and Trends from the Research Literature, ed. D. McEntire and W. Blanchard. Emittsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://training.fema.gov/emiweb/edu/ddemtextbook.asp. Last Accessed 23 Nov 2017.
- IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies). 2000. Improving Coordination. Geneva: IFRC.Google Scholar
- IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies). 2013. World Disasters Report: Focus on Technology and the Future of Humanitarian Action. Geneva: IFRC.Google Scholar
- Kent, R.C. 1987. Anatomy of Disaster Relief: The International Network in Action. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kirsch, T.D., P. Perrin, F.M. Burkle, W. Canny, S. Purdin, W. Len, and L. Sauer. 2012. Requirements for Independent Community-Based Quality Assessment and Accountability Practices in Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Activities. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 27 (3): 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mulyono, N.B., and Y. Ishida. 2014. Humanitarian Logistics and Inventory Model Based on Probabilistic Cellular Automata. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information, and Control 10 (1): 357–372.Google Scholar
- Prendergast, J. 1996. Frontline Diplomacy: Humanitarian Aid and Conflict in Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R.D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Rey, F. 2001. The Complex Nature of Actors in Humanitarian Action and the Challenge of Coordination. In Reflections on Humanitarian Action: Principles, Ethics and Contradictions, ed. Humanitarian Studies Unit. London: TNI/Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, G., A. Stoddard, A. Harmer, K. Haver, and P. Harvey. 2012. The State of the Humanitarian System (2012 Edition). London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
- USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development). 2002. Mozambique Flood Resettlement Grant Activity. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar