Advertisement

Disaster Relief Provision

  • Bimal Kanti Paul
Chapter

Abstract

Providing examples from many past relief operations conducted in both developed and developing countries, this chapter presents major undesirable aspects of disaster relief disbursement. A clear understanding of these aspects is necessary for emergency managers and planners to improve their capability and performance in future disaster relief operations. These aspects are not completely new to the environmental hazard and disaster researchers because the inherent weaknesses of relief disbursement are closely associated with a several key concepts/traditions (e.g., vulnerability, political-ecological paradigm, and participatory exclusion) of the subfield. After briefly discussing these concepts, crucial aspects of disaster relief disbursement, such as biased relief distribution, and timeliness and misuse/non-use of disaster relief, are presented. Biased distribution is typically caused because of the income, age, gender, religious and ethnic affiliation, and immigration status of disaster survivors as well as region- and area-specific relief distribution. How to evaluate effectiveness of disaster relief distribution is presented next, and finally determinants of disaster relief at the country and individual/household levels are covered.

Keywords

Human ecological tradition Political-ecological paradigm Vulnerability Participatory exclusion Biased relief distribution Discrimination Dalit Patron–client networks Timely distribution Damaged infrastructure Customs inspection Double count Human rights violation Effectiveness of disaster relief distribution and Determinants of disaster aid 

References

  1. Agarwal, B. 2001. Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework. World Development 29 (10): 1623–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, D.P. 2010. The Power of People: Social Capital’s Role in Recovery from the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. Natural Hazards 56: 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali, A.I., and G. Ince. 2017. Distress Among Disaster-Affected Populations: Delay in Relief Provision. Journal of Operational Research Society 68 (5): 533–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora, V. 2015. Geopolitics Enters Nepal’s Earthquake Relief Efforts: What Was Behind Nepal’s Call This Week for Foreign Teams to Leave the Country? Diplomat, May 6.Google Scholar
  5. Asia Foundation. 2016. Nepal Government Distribution of Earthquake Reconstruction Cash Grants for Private Houses. San Francisco: The Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Auten, G.E., H. Sieg, and C.T. Clotfelter. 2002. Charitable Giving, Income, and Taxes: An Analysis of Panel Data. American Economic Review 92: 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakija, J., and B. Heim. 2008. How Does Charitable Giving Respond to Incentives and Income? Dynamic Panel Estimates Accounting for Predictable Changes in Taxation. NBER Working Paper 14237, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  8. Balcik, B., B.M. Beamon, and K. Smilowitz. 2008. Last Mile Distribution in Humanitarian Relief. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 12 (2): 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becerra, O., E.A. Cavallo, and I. Noy. 2014. Foreign Aid in the Aftermath of Large Disasters. Review of Development Economics 18 (3): 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis, and B. Wisner. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bode, B. 2002. In Pursuit of Power: The North West Institutional Analysis. Dhaka: CARE Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  12. Bolin, R., and L. Stanford. 1999. Constructing Vulnerability in the First World: The Northridge Earthquake in Southern California. In The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective, ed. A. Oliver-Smith, and S.M. Hoffman, 89–112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bradshaw, S. 2013. Gender, Development and Disasters. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. BBC News. 2005. Where Did UK Tsunami Millions Go? http://alertnet.org/thefacts/reliefresources/112230013428.htm. Last Accessed 21 June 2006.
  15. Burton, I., R.W. Kates, and G.F. White. 1993. The Environment as Hazards. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Christophe, S., and M.O. Adams. 2016. Return to a State of Nature, Compassionate Conservatism, Failed Response, and Their Impact on Race, Ethnicity, and the U.S. Economy: Hurricane Katrina Case Study. In Cities and Disasters, ed. D.C. Downey, 105–125. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cutter, S.L. 2003. The Vulnerability of Science and the Science of Vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cutter, S.L., and C. Finch. 2008. Temporal and Spatial Changes in Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (7): 2301–2306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dalit NGO Federation (DNF). 2015. Waiting for ‘‘Justice in Response’’: Report of Initial Findings from Immediate Needs Assessment and Monitoring Responses Towards Affected Dalit Communities in Nepal Earthquake 2015. DNF: Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  20. Daniel, F.J., and K. Mahr. 2015. Nepal, Aid Agencies Trade Blame as Confusion Mars Quake Relief. htttp://in.reuters.com/article/earthquake-nepal-aid-idINKBNONQ1DG20150505. Accessed 2 Apr 2016.
  21. David, A. 2011. How Do International Financial Flows to Developing Countries Respond to Natural Disasters? Global Economy Journal 11 (4): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, A.C., D. Lamothe, and E. O’Keefe. 2017. U.S. Response in Puerto Rico Pales Next to Actions After Haiti Quake. The Washington Post, Sept 28.Google Scholar
  23. Delaney, P., and E. Shrader. 2000. Gender and Post-disaster Reconstruction: The Case of Hurricane Mitch in Honduras and Nicaragua. Decision Review Draft Presented to the World Bank.Google Scholar
  24. Demirel-Pegg, T., and J. Moskowitz. 2009. US Aid Allocation: The Nexus of Human Rights, Democracy, and Development. Journal of Peace Research 46 (2): 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Donnan, S. 2005. Frustration for Donors as Aid Piles Up on Docks. Financial Times, May 12.Google Scholar
  26. Drury, A.C., R.S. Olson, and D.A. Van Belle. 2005. The Politics of Humanitarian Aid: U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance, 1964–1995. Journal of Politics 67 (2): 454–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elliot, J., and L. Sullivan. 2015. How the Red Cross Raised Half a Billion Dollars for Haiti and Built Six Homes: Even as the Group Has Publicly Celebrated its Works, Insider Accounts Detail a String of Failure. June 3, 2015. https://www.propublica.org/article/how-the-red-cross-raised-half-a-billion-dollars-for-haiti-and-built-6-homes. Last Accessed 1 Nov 2017.
  28. Emel, J., and R. Peet. 1989. Resource Management and Natural Hazards. In New Models in Geography, ed. R. Peet and N. Thrift, 49–76. London: Unwin Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fink, G., and S. Redaelli. 2011. Determinants of International Emergency Aid: Humanitarian Need Only? Word Development 39: 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fisher, S. 2005. Gender Based Violence in Sri Lanks in the After-Math of the 2004 Tsunami Crisis: The Role of International Organizations and International NGOs in Prevention and Response to Gender Based Violence. Phd dissertation, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.Google Scholar
  31. Fleck, R.K., and C. Kilby. 2010. Changing Aid Regimes? U.S. Foreign Aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Journal of Development Economics 91 (2): 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fugate, W. 2012. The State of FEMA—Leaning Forward: Go Big, Go Early, Go Fast, Be Smart. A Report by the US Department of Homeland Security. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Gittell, R., and E. Tebaldi. 2006. Charitable Giving: Factors Influencing Giving in US States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35 (4): 721–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Government of Bangladesh (GoB). 2008. Cyclone Sidr in Bangladesh: Damage, Loss, and Need Assessment for Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction. Dhaka.Google Scholar
  35. Hebblethwaite, B. 2011. Haiti Earthquake (2010). In Encyclopedia of Disaster Relief, ed. K.B. Penuel and M. Statler, 258–262. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Hewitt, K. 1983. The Idea of Calamity in a Technocratic Age. In Interpretations of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology, ed. K. Hewitt, 3–32. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  37. Hewitt, K. 1997. Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  38. Holguin-Veras, J., and M. Jaller. 2012. Immediate Resource Requirements After Hurricane Katrina. Natural Hazards Review 15 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holguin-Veras, J., N. Perez, S. Ukkusuri, T. Wachtendorf, and B. Brown. 2007. Emergency Logistics Issues Impacting the Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Synthesis and Preliminary Suggestions for Improvement. Transportation Research Board (2022): 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hossain, S.M.M., and P. Kolsteren. 2003. The 1998 Flood in Bangladesh: Is Different Targeting Needed During Emergencies and Recovery to Tackle Malnutrition? Disasters 27 (2): 172–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Human Rights Watch. 2005. India: End Caste Bias in Tsunami Relief. https://www.hrw.org/news/2005/01/14/india-end-caste-bias-tsunami-relief. Last Accessed 16 Sept 2017.
  42. International Agencies. 2009. In-depth Recovery Needs Assessment of Cyclone Aila Affected Areas. Dhaka.Google Scholar
  43. International Dalit Solidarity Network (IDSN). 2013. Equality in Aid: Addressing Caste Discrimination in Humanitarian Response. Copenhagen: IDSN.Google Scholar
  44. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). 2006. Operation Update: Pakistan Earthquake, May 30. http://www.ifrc.org/docs/appeals/05/05EA02225.pdf. Last Accessed 27 Sept 2017.
  45. Ishida, R. 2013. Determinants of Cheritable Giving to Unexpected Natural Disasters: Evidence from Two Big Earthquakes in Japan. Unpublished Paper. http://cis.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/Japanese/society/140110ws/ishidapaper.pdf. Last Accessed 13 Sept 2017.
  46. Islam, R., and G. Walkerden. 2015. How Do Links Between Households and NGOs Promote Disaster Resilience and Recovery? A Case Study of Linking Social Networks on the Bangladesh Coast. Natural Hazards 78: 1707–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jamieson, T. n.d. Strategic Compassion: The Determinants of U.S. International Emergency Aid After Natural Disasters. An Unpublished paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  48. Jones, E.C., and A.D. Murphy (eds.). 2009. The Political Economy of Hazards and Disasters. Berkeley: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kathmandu Post. 2015. Four Dead in Sindhupalchock Chopper Crash, June 2.Google Scholar
  50. Kelman, I. 2012. Disaster Diplomacy: How Disaster Affect Peace and Conflict. Abindon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Kirsch, T.D., E. Leidman, W. Weiss, and S. Doocy. 2012. The Impact of the Earthquake and Humanitarian Assistance on Household Economies and Livelihoods of Earthquake-Affected Populations in Haiti. American Journal of Disaster Medicine 7 (2): 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kumar, R., and T. Kala. 2006. Two Years After the Asian Tsunami: Thousands Still Suffering in India. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/dec2006/indi-d29shtml. Last Accessed 14 Feb 2007.
  53. Lewis, D., and A. Hossain. 2008. A Tale of Three Villages: Power, Difference and Local Difference in Rural Bangladesh. Journal of South Asian Development 3 (1): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mahmud, T., and M. Prowse. 2012. Corruption in Cyclone Preparedness and Relief Efforts in Coastal Bangladesh: Lessons for Climate Adaptation? Global Environmental Change 22: 933–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mallick, B., S.M. Witte, R. Sarker, A.S. Mahboob, and J. Vogt. 2009. Local Adaptation Strategies of a Coastal Community During Cyclone Sidr and Their Vulnerability Analysis for Sustainable Disaster Mitigation Planning in Bangladesh. Journal of Bangladesh Institute of Planners 2: 158–168.Google Scholar
  56. Margesson, R. 2005. Indian Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami: Humanitarian Assistance and Relief Operations. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  57. Ministry of Food and Disaster Management (MoFDM). 2009. Special Situation Report by WASH Cluster Working Group to Disaster Management Bureau. Dhaka: Government of Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  58. Mitchell, J.T., and S.L. Cutter. 1997. Global Change and Environmental Hazards: Is the World Becoming More Disastrous? Washington, DC: AAG.Google Scholar
  59. Montz, B.E., G.A. Tobin, and R.R. Hagelman III. 2017. Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mustafa, D. 2003. Reinforcing Vulnerability? Disaster Relief, Recovery, and Response to the 2001 Flood in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Environmental Hazards 5: 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nadiruzzaman, M., and D. Wrathall. 2014. Participatory Exclusion—Elite Capture of Participatory Approaches in the Aftermath of Cyclone Sidr. UNU-EHS Working Paper Series 3, United Nations University, Bonn.Google Scholar
  62. Nadiruzzaman, M., and D. Wrathall. 2015. Participatory Exclusion—Cyclone Sidr and Its Aftermath. Geoforum 64: 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nagurney, A., A.H. Masoumi, and M. Yu. 2015. An Integrated Disaster Relief Supply Chain Network Model with Time Targets and Demand Uncertainty. In Regional Science Matters: Studies Dedicated to Walter Isard, ed. P. Nijkamp, A. Rose, and K. Kourtit, 287–318. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Nagurney, A., and L.S. Nagurney. 2016. A Mean-Variance Disaster Relief Supply Chain Network Model for Risk Reduction with Stochastic Link Costs, Time Targets, and Demand Uncertainty. In Dynamics of Disasters: Key Concepts, Models, Algorithms, and Insights, ed. L.S. Kotsireas, A. Nagurney, and P.M. Pardalos, 231–255. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  65. Nelson, T. 2012. Determinants of Disaster Aid: Donor Interest or Recipient Need? Global Change, Peace & Security 24 (1): 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nissanka, J. 2006. Tsunami Recovery Process: Reorganization on Way. http://www.sundayobserver.lk.2005/12/25/news01.html. Last Accessed 19 Aug 2011.
  67. Olsen, G.R., N. Carstensen, and K. Heyen. 2003. Humanitarian Crises: What Determine the Level of Emergency Assistance? Medical Coverage, Donor Interests and the Aid Businees. Disasters 27 (2): 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pariyar, R. 2015. Double Trouble: The Dalit Community Has Faced Discrimination in Relief Distribution After the Great Quake. Kathmandu Post, Dec 6.Google Scholar
  69. Paul, A., and M. Rahman. 2006. Cyclone Mitigation Perspectives in the Islands of Bangladesh: A Case of Sandwip and Hatia Islands. Coastal Management 34: 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Paul, B.K. 1998. Coping with the 1996 Tornado in Tangail, Bangladesh: An Analysis of Field Data. The Professional Geographer 50 (3): 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Paul, B.K. 2003. Relief Assistance to 1998 Flood Victims: A Comparison of the Performance of the Government and NGOs. The Geographical Journal 169 (1): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Paul, B.K. 2006. Disaster Relief Efforts: An Update. Progress in Development Studies 6 (3): 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Paul, B.K. 2007. 2004 Tsunami Relief Efforts: An Overview. Asian Profile 35 (5): 467–478.Google Scholar
  74. Paul, B.K. 2011. Environmental Hazards and Disasters: Contexts, Perspectives and Management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Paul, B.K., and J. Leven. 2002. Emergency Support Satisfaction Among 2001 Hoisington, Kansas Tornado Victims. Quick Response Report #154. NHRAIC, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  76. Paul, B.K., and M.K. Rahman. 2013. Recovery Efforts: The Case of the 2007 Cyclone Sidr in Bangladesh. In Natural Disasters and Adaptation to Climate Change, ed. S. Boulter, J. Palutikof, D.J. Karoly, and D. Guitart, 167–173. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Paul, B.K., B. Acharya, and K. Ghimire. 2017. Effectiveness of Earthquakes Relief Efforts in Nepal: Opinions of the Survivors. Natural Hazards 85: 1169–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Paul, S.K., and M.N. Hossain. 2013. People’s Perception About Flood Disaster Management in Bangladesh: A Case Study on the Chalan Beel Area. Stamford Journal of Environment and Human Habitat 2: 72–86.Google Scholar
  79. Paul, S.K., B.K. Paul, and J.K. Routray. 2012. Post-Cyclone Sidr Nutritional Status of Women and Children in Coastal Bangladesh: An Empirical Study. Natural Hazards 64 (1): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pelling, M. 1998. Participation, Social Capital and Vulnerability to Urban Flooding in Guyana. Journal of International Development 10: 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pelling, M. 1999. The Political Ecology of Flood Hazard in Urban Guyana. Geoforum 30: 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. P’Rayan, A. 2005. Impact of Tsunami Relief and Rehabilitation Work in India. http://www.Worldpress.org/Asia2116.cfm. Last Accessed 13 June 2005.
  83. Raschky, P.A., and M. Schwindt. 2011. On the Channel and Type of Aid: The Case of International Disaster Assistance. European Journal of Political Economy 28 (1): 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rasler, K., W.R. Thompson, and S. Ganguly. 2013. How Rivalries End. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Reliefweb. 2005. Indonesia: Aceh Tsunami Aid Sold Outside the Tsunami Ravage Province. http://www.reliefweb.int/rw.RWB.FSF/dh900SID?EVOD-6J5DUK?OpenDocument. Last Accessed 4 Aug 2010.
  86. Reliefweb. 2013. Equality in Aid: Addressing Caste Discrimination in Humanitarian Response, 30 Sept, 2015. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/equality-aid-addressing-caste-discrimination-humanitarian-response. Last Accessed 6 Nov 2017.
  87. Robbins, P. 2012. Political Ecology. Boston: Wiley.Google Scholar
  88. Sanderson, D., and B. Ramalingam. 2015. Nepal Earthquake Response: Lessons for Operational Agencies. ALNAP Lessons Paper. London: ALNAP/ODI.Google Scholar
  89. Simon, A. 1997. Television News and International Earthquake Relief. Journal of Communication 47 (3): 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Specia, M. 2015. Nepal’s Poorest Getting the Least Earthquake Aid, Activists Warn. http://mashable.com/2015/06/02nepal-caste-earthquake-relief/#pWwbQKJa5kqy. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  91. Strömberg, D. 2007. Natural Disasters, Economic Development, and Humanitarian Aid. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (3): 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Susila Dharma International (SDI). 2015. The Caste System and Disaster Relief in Nepal, 8 June. https://www.susiladharma.org/the-caste-system-and-disaster-relief-in-nepal/. Last Accessed 6 Nov 2017.
  93. Susman, P., P. O’Keefe, and B. Wisner. 1983. Global Disasters: A Radical Interpretation. In Interpretations of Calamities, ed. K. Hewitt, 274–276. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  94. Tiehen, L. 2001. Tax Policy and Charitable Contributions of Money. National Tax Journal 54 (4): 707–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tornau, U. 2006. CNN Effect: Power or Mean? A Study of Media Influence on Foreign Policy Decision—Making Comparative Analysis of Two Humanitarian Disasters: Ethiopia (1984–1985) and Somalia (1992). Master of Comparative History, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  96. Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB). 2011. Annual Report 2010. Dhaka: TIB.Google Scholar
  97. Troutman, E. 2015. What Happened to the Aid? Nepal Earthquake Response Echoes Haiti. Aid Works, 19 June. http://aid.works/2015/06/nepal-haiti/. Last Accessed 16 Sept 2017.
  98. U.N. (United Nations). 2006. Tsunami Recovery: Taking Stock After 12 Months. New York.Google Scholar
  99. Van Wassenhove, L. 2006. Humanitarian and Logistics: Supply Chain Management in High Gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57: 475–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Versluis, A. 2014. Formal and Informal Material Aid Following the 2010 Haiti Earthquake as Reported by Camp Dwellers. Disasters 39 (S1): S94–S109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Walton-Ellery, S. 2009. A Review of the Cyclone Aila Response 2009: IFRC-Led Emergency Shelter Coordination Group. Dhaka: IFRC.Google Scholar
  102. Walton, R., R. Mays, and M. Haselkorn. 2011. Defining “Fast”: Factors Affecting the Experience of Speed in Humanitarian Logistics. In Proceedings of the 8th International ISCRAM Conference, Liston, May.Google Scholar
  103. Washington Post. 2006. Corruption, Fraud Hunt Tsunami Efforts, Sept 25.Google Scholar
  104. Weesjes, E. 2015. From the Editor. Natural Hazards Observer 39 (5): 3.Google Scholar
  105. Wescoat J.L., Jr. 1987. The Practical Range of Choice in Water Resources Geography. Progress in Human Geography 11 (2): 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. White, F. 1945. Human Adjustment to Flood: A Geographical Approach to the Flood Problem in the United States. Doctoral Dissertation, Research Paper No. 29, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  107. Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and J. Davis. 2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Yang, D. 2008. Coping with Disaster: The Impact of Hurricanes on International Financial Flows. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 8 (1): 1–45.Google Scholar
  109. Zakaria, R. 2015. The Deceptions of Disaster Relief in Nepal: The Aid-Industrial Complex is in Dire Need of Overhaul. Aljazeera America, July 2. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/7/the-deceptions-of-disaster-relief-in-nepal.html. Last Accessed 16 Sept 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations