Build a Shared Strategic Vision of Innovation

  • Benoit Gailly
Chapter

Abstract

Innovation is today seen by many organizations as a key strategic issue. These organizations, however, often embark on costly innovation initiatives, without having any clear idea of what they want to achieve (thus they are inefficient) or why (thus they are ineffective). Too often, they do not understand or do not agree on what innovation is or why and how they want to innovate.

The first challenge of innovation management is therefore to develop a shared strategic vision of innovation: why a firm must proactively manage innovation, what innovation actually means as a business, how it unfolds as a process, what are the different types of innovation, what are the resulting strategic options and what should drive the decision-making regarding those options.

Bibliography1

  1. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Value innovation: The strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review, 82(7–8), 172–180.Google Scholar
  6. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greve, H. (2007). Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(5), 945–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9. Special issue: Strategy content research (Summer, 1988), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moore, G. A. (2014). Crossing the Chasm, 3rd Edition: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  13. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Stock, R., von Hippel, E., & Gillert, N. (2016). Impacts of personality traits on consumer innovation success. Research Policy, 45, 757–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1988). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Utterback, J. M., & Aberbathy, W. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 33, 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benoit Gailly
    • 1
  1. 1.Louvain School of ManagementUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-La-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations