Skip to main content

Curiosity, Exploration, and Children’s Understanding of Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Children’s curiosity often manifests in their exploration—actions that are intended to reveal novel information. In this chapter, we argue that in order to understand how exploration can guide children’s learning, they must first develop an understanding of what learning is and when it occurs in others, as well as a more metacognitive understanding of how their own learning takes place. This knowledge allows children to recognize when they do not know particular pieces of information and strategically generate actions that can close those knowledge gaps. We present evidence that children’s understanding of learning and their ability to reflect on their own learning both develop during the early elementary school years, and synthesize these findings with previous research on exploratory behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is a question, however, about what kinds of explanations adults treat as non-circular. For example, adults tend to prefer reductive, but nonsensical explanations over mechanistic ones that stay in the same domain of knowledge (e.g., Fernandez-Duque, Evans, Christian & Hodges, 2015; Rhodes, Rodriguez & Shah, 2014; Weisberg, Keil, Goodstein, Rawson, & Gray, 2008; Weisberg, Taylor & Hopkins, 2015; see Hopkins, Weisberg & Taylor, 2016, for a review).

  2. 2.

    A finding also observed in adults (e.g., Coenen, Rehder, & Gureckis, 2015; Rottman & Keil, 2012; Sobel & Kushnir, 2006; Steyvers, Tenenbaum, Wagenmakers, & Blum, 2003).

  3. 3.

    A parallel can be drawn to children’s understanding of pretending. At early ages, children engage in pretend play (e.g., Piaget, 1962) and understand others’ pretense (e.g., Harris & Kavanaugh, 1993; Lillard & Witherington, 2004). While the sophistication of children’s pretense does undergo development during the preschool years (e.g., Overton & Jackson, 1973), it is not until well after the preschool years that children begin to appreciate the metacognitive nature of pretending. For instance, understanding that pretenders must know about what they are pretending to be (Lillard, 1993), intend their actions as pretense (Lillard, 1998), or even be aware they are pretending (Sobel, 2004) all develops between the ages of 4–7 (see Lillard, 2001; Sobel, 2009, for reviews). What these data suggest is that children’s engagement in a behavior (i.e., pretending, learning) is not necessarily indicative of their metacognitive understanding of how they are engaging in that behavior, which potentially has a more prolonged developmental trajectory.

  4. 4.

    These questions were then repeated several times over a 5-min interview, so that children could generate several different examples. The results presented here represent how children responded over the entire interview, not for any one example.

  5. 5.

    Critically, Legare (2012) reports that there is not a significant interaction between age group and explanation type (p. 181). However, this might have been because the other three explanation types did not show this pattern and age was treated categorically as opposed to continuously.

  6. 6.

    The similarity of our testing session to Cook et al (2011) was validated by Claire Cook, who observed us collect data (Personal Communication, May 29, 2013), and Laura Schulz who viewed videos of the procedure (Personal Communication, August 26, 2013).

References

  • Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. A., Markman, E. M., & Melartin, R. L. (1993). Infants’ ability to draw inferences about nonobvious object properties: Evidence from exploratory play. Child Development, 64(3), 711–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, K., Horvath, K., & Estes, D. (2003). Young children’s talk about learning events. Cognitive Development, 18(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, L. A., Danovitch, J. H., & Keil, F. C. (2008). Children’s sensitivity to circular explanations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(2), 146–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S. R., Robinson, E. J., Carroll, D. J., & Apperly, I. A. (2006). Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities. Child Development, 77(2), 413–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bemis, R. H., Leichtman, M. D., & Pillemer, D. B. (2011). ‘I Remember When I Learned That!’: Developmental and gender differences in children’s memories of learning episodes. Infant and Child Development, 20(4), 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bemis, R. H., Leichtman, M. D., & Pillemer, D. B. (2013). I remember when you taught me that! Preschool children’s memories of realistic learning episodes. Infant and Child Development, 22(6), 603–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W. F., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (1998). Explanation in scientists and children. Minds and Machines, 8(1), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1958). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1757).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209–254). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L. P., & Markman, E. M. (2012). Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. Child Development, 83(4), 1416–1428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callanan, M. A., & Oakes, L. M. (1992). Preschoolers’ questions and parents’ explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7, 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, L. J., & Barr, R. A. (1989). On the relationship between category intensions and extensions in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47(3), 413–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chouinard, M. M. (2007). Children’s questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(1), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, A., Rehder, B., & Gureckis, T. M. (2015). Strategies to intervene on causal systems are adaptively selected. Cognitive Psychology, 79, 102–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C., Goodman, N. D., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition, 120(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corriveau, K. H., & Kurkul, K. E. (2014). “Why does rain fall?”: Children prefer to learn from an informant who uses noncircular explanations. Child Development, 85(5), 1827–1835.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent‐child activity. Science Education, 85(6), 712–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destan, N., Hembacher, E., Ghetti, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2014). Early metacognitive abilities: The interplay of monitoring and control processes in 5-to 7-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 213–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisbach, A. O. (2004). Children’s developing awareness of diversity in people’s trains of thought. Child Development, 75(6), 1694–1707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erb, C. D., & Sobel, D. M. (2014). The development of diagnostic reasoning about uncertain events between ages 4–7. PloS one9(3), e92285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen, B. M., Taylor, M., & Stoess, C. (1997). Children’s behavioral understanding of knowledge acquisition. Cognitive Development, 12(1), 53–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90030-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Duque, D., Evans, J., Christian, C., & Hodges, S. D. (2015). Superfluous neuroscience information makes explanations of psychological phenomena more appealing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(5), 913–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., Flavell, E. R., Harris, P. L., & Astington, J. W. (1995). Young children’s knowledge about thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(1), 1–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2009). Preschoolers’ search for explanatory information within adult-child conversation. Child Development, 80, 1592–1611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01356.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, G., & Callanan, M. (2013). Pedagogy versus exploration: Parent–child interactions in a museum setting. Poster presented at biennial meetings of Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins, S., Haight, W., & Lancy, D. F. (2007). The cultural construction of play. In A. Goncu & S. Gaskins (Eds.), Play and development: Evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives (pp. 179–202). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvain, M., & Perez, S. (2015). Cognitive development and culture. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science., 2(20), 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. (1998). Explanation as orgasm. Minds and Machines, 8(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological bulletin138(6), 1085–1108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gweon, H., Pelton, H., Konopka, J. A., & Schulz, L. E. (2014). Sins of omission: Children selectively explore when teachers are under-informative. Cognition, 132(3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gweon, H., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). 16-month-olds rationally infer causes of failed actions. Science, 332, 1524. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haith, M. M. (1993). Future-oriented processes in infancy: The case of visual expectations. In C. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy (pp. 235–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L., & Kavanaugh, R. D. (1993). Young children’s understanding of pretense. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(1), 1–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hembacher, E., & Ghetti, S. (2014). Don’t look at my answer: Subjective uncertainty underlies preschoolers’ exclusion of their least accurate memories. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1768–1776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, E. J., Weisberg, D. S., & Taylor, J. C. (2016). The seductive allure is a reductive allure: People prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information. Cognition, 155, 67–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., & Wellman, H. (1982). Children’s developing conceptions of the mind and brain. Child Development, 53(1), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C., & Batterman, N. (1984). A characteristic-to-defining shift in the development of word meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(2), 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83(2), B35–B42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kushnir, T., & Gopnik, A. (2005). Young children infer causal strength from probabilities and interventions. Psychological Science, 16(9), 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01595.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lagattuta, K. H., & Wellman, H. M. (2001). Thinking about the past: Early knowledge about links between prior experience, thinking, and emotion. Child Development, 72(1), 82–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legare, C. H. (2012). Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent evidence informs exploratory, hypothesis-testing behavior in young children. Child Development, 83(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legare, C. H., Sobel, D. M., & Callanan, M. (2017). Causal learning is collaborative: Examining explanation and exploration in a social context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1548–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau, S. M., Meisner, R., Neuwirth, J. L., & Sobel, D. M. (2017). What do caregivers notice and value about how children learn through play in a children’s museum? Journal of Museum Education, 42(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2004). Learning as a task or a virtue: US and Chinese preschoolers explain learning. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 595–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S. (1993). Pretend play skills and the child’s theory of mind. Child Development, 64(2), 348–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S. (1998). Playing with a theory of mind. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on play in early childhood education (pp. 11–33). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S. (2001). Pretend play as twin earth: A social-cognitive analysis. Developmental Review, 21(4), 495–531. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2001.0532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, A. S., & Witherington, D. S. (2004). Mothers’ behavioral modifications during pretense snacks and their possible signal value for toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 40, 95–113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 16(1), 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Brandone, A. C. (2008). Focusing on the relation: Fewer exemplars facilitate children’s initial verb learning and extension. Developmental Science, 11(4), 628–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, H., Bernard, S., & Clément, F. (2014). Early sensitivity to arguments: How preschoolers weight circular arguments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 125, 102–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W. F., & Jackson, J. P. (1973). The representation of imagined objects in action sequences: A developmental study. Child Development, 44(2), 309–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, P., Harkness, S., & Super, C. (2004). Asian and euro-American parents’ ethnotheories of play and learning: Effects on preschool children’s home routines and school behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. E., Rodriguez, F., & Shah, P. (2014). Explaining the alluring influence of neuroscience information on scientific reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roopnarine, J. L. (2011). Cultural variations in beliefs about play, parent–child play, and children’s play: Meaning for childhood development. In A. Pellegrini (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 19–37). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rottman, B. M., & Keil, F. C. (2012). Causal structure learning over time: Observations and interventions. Cognitive Psychology, 64(1), 93–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, M. A., Xu, F., Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Lee, K. (2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of Chinese and US preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17(1), 74–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, L. E., Gopnik, A., & Glymour, C. (2007). Preschool children learn about causal structure from conditional interventions. Developmental Science, 10(3), 322–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shneidman, L., Gweon, H., Schulz, L. E., & Woodward, A. L. (2016). Learning from others and spontaneous exploration: A cross-cultural investigation. Child Development, 87(3), 723–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M. (2004). Children’s causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M. (2009). Enabling conditions and children’s understanding of pretense. Cognition, 113, 177–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M. (2015). Can you do it? How preschoolers judge whether others have learned. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16(3), 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M., & Kushnir, T. (2006). The importance of decision making in causal learning from interventions. Memory & Cognition, 34, 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M., & Legare, C. H. (2014). Causal learning in children. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(4), 413–427.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M., & Letourneau, S. M. (2015). Children’s developing understanding of what and how they learn. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M., & Letourneau, S. M. (in press). Preschoolers’ understanding of how others learn through action and instruction. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M., Li, J., & Corriveau, K. H. (2007). “They danced around in my head and I learned them”: Children’s developing conceptions of learning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(3), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370701446806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. M., & Sommerville, J. A. (2010). The importance of discovery in children’s causal learning from interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99(4), 605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, A. E., & Feigenson, L. (2015). Observing the unexpected enhances infants’ learning and exploration. Science, 348(6230), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa3799

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Blum, B. (2003). Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27, 453–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. M., & Bartsch, K. (2012). Young children’s recognition of how and when knowledge was acquired. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(3), 372–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.577759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. M., Bartsch, K., & Nunez, N. (2007). Young children’s reports of when learning occurred. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tardif, T., & Wellman, H. M. (2000). Acquisition of mental state language in mandarin-and Cantonese-speaking children. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 25–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., Esbensen, B. M., & Bennett, R. T. (1994). Children’s understanding of knowledge acquisition: The tendency for children to report that they have always known what they have just learned. Child Development, 65(6), 1581–1604. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Schijndel, T. J., Franse, R. K., & Raijmakers, M. E. (2010). The Exploratory Behavior Scale: Assessing young visitors’ hands‐on behavior in science museums. Science Education, 94(5), 794–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C., Bonawitz, E., & Lombrozo, T. (2017). Effects of explaining on children’s preference for simpler hypotheses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1538–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470–477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, D. S., Taylor, J. C., & Hopkins, E. J. (2015). Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Judgment and Decision making, 10(5), 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Fang, F., Liu, D., Zhu, L., & Liu, G. (2006). Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1075–1081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Fang, F., & Peterson, C. C. (2011). Sequential progressions in a theory-of-mind scale: Longitudinal perspectives. Child Development, 82(3), 780–792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wister, A. (2014). Exploring exploration: How evidence affects 4- and 5-year-old children’s exploratory play (Undergraduate Honors Thesis). Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors were supported by NSF (1223777 and 1420548 to DMS) when this research was conducted and during the writing of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Sobel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sobel, D.M., Letourneau, S.M. (2018). Curiosity, Exploration, and Children’s Understanding of Learning. In: Saylor, M., Ganea, P. (eds) Active Learning from Infancy to Childhood. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77182-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics