Skip to main content

Transparency, Humanism, and the Politics of the Future Before and After May ’68

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transparency, Society and Subjectivity
  • 715 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter considers the effect of May ’68 on French critiques of “transparency,” and argues that a significant gap existed between (a) principally epistemological critiques published shortly before 1968, and (b) the rise of a new set of political critiques of transparency in the 1970s. The three years before May ’68 saw the publication of Leroi-Gourhan’s Gesture and Speech, Foucault’s Order of Things, and Derrida’s Of Grammatology, which all took for granted that no mind/world transparency was available to the human subject. All three works signaled that a certain transparency might be possible—even imminent—in the near future, provided a certain humanism was jettisoned, and with it the expectation that transparency would be achievable by humans themselves. May ’68 completely obviated this line of thinking.

This essay pursues further problems developed in my Transparency in Postwar France: A Critical History of the Present (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2017); some discussion here reworks (considerably) passages from that book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    My reading of Sartre’s treatment of transparency differs considerably from Manfred Schneider’s , which he pursues further in his contribution to this volume. I do not have the space to establish these differences or the reading itself in all its necessary complexity here, and ask the reader to please consult Geroulanos 2017: 48–63.

  2. 2.

    Rosanvallon 1979. Note that the second edition, published in 1999, removes the entire critique of transparency in the preface of the original edition. François Furet 1981: 16, 19, 50, 60.

  3. 3.

    See also Foucault 1966: 210, where Foucault interprets the understanding of desire and the “table of representation” again by way of transparency.

  4. 4.

    See Leroi-Gourhan’s sense that material and social evidence should be understood in terms of complementarity rather than transparency or co-dependence (Leroi-Gourhan 1964–1965: 147).

  5. 5.

    See the fourth point of the founding declaration of the Union des Jeunesses communistes Marxistes-Léninistes which proposed to form revolutionary intellectuals linked to “the workers and the working people” and to institute “new forms of organization” that would realize this “task.” In Résolution (1967).

  6. 6.

    See also Lyotard’s treatment of social transparency in Economie libidinale of Marx’s theorization of “the mystery of labor” and its “erasure” in Capital (Lyotard 1974: 134).

Works Cited

  • Althusser, Louis. 1990. For Marx. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, Maurice. 1948 [1996]. The Most High. Trans. Allan Stoekl. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clastres, Pierre. 1974 [1987]. Society against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1972 [2004]. How Do We Recognize Structuralism? In Desert Islands and Other Texts, 170–192. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Letter to a Harsh Critic. In Negotiations, 3–12. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1967 [1997]. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972 [1980]. Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The Other Heading: Reflections on Today’s Europe. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael B. Naas. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques, and Maurizio Ferraris. 2001. A Taste for the Secret. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1966 [1994]. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1975 [1995]. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. The Eye of Power. In Power/Knowledge, 146–165. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Psychiatric Power. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet, François. 1978 [1981]. Interpreting the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroulanos, Stefanos. 2017. Transparency in Postwar France: A Critical History of the Present. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glissant, Édouard. 2006. Poetics of Relation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, André. 1964–1965 [1993]. Gesture and Speech. Trans. Anna Bostock Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963 [1983]. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Founder of the Sciences of Man. In Structural Anthropology, vol. 2, trans. Monique Layton, 33–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1974 [1993]. Libidinal Economy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979 [1984]. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986 [1992]. The Postmodern Explained to Children. London: Turnaround.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, Barack. 2009. Transparency and Open Government: Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. January 21. www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment. Last accessed 10 Jan 2017.

  • Résolution politique de la première session du premier Congrès de l’UJC (ml). 1967. In Les Cahiers marxistes-léninistes 15 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1979. Le Capitalisme utopique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1989. Dirty Hands. In No Exit and Three Other Plays. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starobinski, Jean. 1957 [1988]. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanos Geroulanos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Geroulanos, S. (2018). Transparency, Humanism, and the Politics of the Future Before and After May ’68. In: Alloa, E., Thomä, D. (eds) Transparency, Society and Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics