Abstract
This introductory chapter gives an overview of the emergent field of Critical Transparency Studies. Moreover, it traces some genealogical lines of how, from the eighteenth century onwards, what was known in Antiquity as an optical and aesthetic phenomenon—diaphaneity—came to stand for central concerns in self-knowledge, morality and politics. Such an analysis of the historical semantics of transparency highlights the irreducible plurality of the phenomenon. Against tendencies of seeing transparency as a means of achieving self-coincidence, unicity and self-stability, the chapter sketches an alternative understanding of transparency as diaphaneity and fleshes out the dynamic, transversal and often conflictual nature of sense, making way for a more comprehensive understanding of the contradictions of social existence.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Julian Assange in Alex Gibney’s documentary movie We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks (USA, 2013).
Works Cited
Ala’i, Padideh, and Robert G. Vaughn. 2014. Research Handbook on Transparency. Cheltenham and Northampton: Elgar Publishing.
Alloa, Emmanuel. 2011. Das durchscheinende Bild. Konturen einer medialen Phänomenologie. Berlin and Zurich: diaphanes (2nd revised edition 2018).
———. 2016. What Is About to Come Will Be Dominated by Transparency. On Glass Architecture and Modernism’s Ambivalent Legacy. In TRANSPARENCIES. The ambivalence of a new visibility, ed. Simone Neuenschwander and Thomas Thiel, 76–79. Bielefeld; Nürnberg; Berlin: Bielefelder Kunstverein; Kunstverein Nürnberg; Kulturstiftung des Bundes.
Alloa, Emmanuel, and Sara Guindani, eds. 2011. La transparence: Esthétique et politique, Special issue of the journal Appareil 7, Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme Paris Nord.
Benjamin, Walter. 1929 [2005]. The Return of the Flâneur. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. In Selected Writings, Volume 2: Part 1: 1927–1930, ed. Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary Smith, 262–267. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1843 [1962]. The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. John Bowring. New York: Russell & Russell, vol. X.
———. 1995. The Panopticon Writings. Ed. Miran Božovič. London: Verso Press.
Birchall, Clare. 2014. Radical Transparency? Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 14 (1): 77–88.
Brandeis, Louis D. 1913. What Publicity Can Do. Harper’s Weekly 58, no. 2974.
Chambers, Simone. 2004. Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4): 389–410.
Christensen, Lars Thøger, and Joep Cornelissen. 2015. Organizational Transparency as Myth and Metaphor. European Journal of Social Theory 18 (2): 132–149.
Dennett, Daniel C., and Deb Roy. 2015. Our Transparent Future. Scientific American 312 (3): 64–69.
Fenster, Mark. 2015. Transparency in Search of a Theory. European Journal of Social Theory 18 (2): 150–167.
———. 2017. The Transparency Fix. Secrets, Leaks, and Uncontrollable Government Information. Stanford: Stanford UP.
Fox, Jonathan. 2007. The Uncertain Relationship Between Transparency and Accountability. Development in Practice 17 (4–5): 663–671.
Giedion, Siegfried. 1949. Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of the New Tradition. 2nd ed. Cambridge: The Harvard University Press.
Götz, Norbert, and Carl Marklund, eds. 2015. The Paradox of Openness: Transparency and Participation in Nordic Cultures of Consensus. Leiden: Brill.
Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan G., and Albert J. Meijer. 2014. Effects of Transparency on the Perceived Trustworthiness of a Government Organization—Evidence from an Online Experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (1): 137–157.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2015. The Transparency Society. Trans. Erik Butler. Stanford: Stanford UP.
Hansen, Hans Krause, Lars Thøger Christensen, and Mikkel Flyverbom. 2015. Introduction: Logics of Transparency in Late Modernity: Paradoxes, Mediation and Governance. European Journal of Social Theory 18 (2): 117–131.
Hood, Christopher. 2006. Transparency in Historical Perspective. In Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? ed. Christopher Hood and David Heald, 1–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hooke, Robert. 1665. Micrographia: Or, Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses. London: The Royal Society.
Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. 1947. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments, trans. Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford UP.
Kepes, György. 1944. The Language of Vision. Chicago: Theobold.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Libaert, Thierry. 2003. La transparence en trompe-l’oeil. Paris: Éditions Descartes & Cie.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Trans. John Bednarz with Dirk Baecker. Stanford: Stanford UP.
Lyon, David. 2009. Surveillance, Power and Everyday Life. In The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, ed. Chrisanthi Avgerou, Robin Mansell, Danny Quah, and Roger Silverstone, 449–472. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Moholy-Nagy, László. 1947. Vision in Motion. Chicago: P. Theobald.
Morgenstern, Oskar. 1928. Wirtschaftsprognose. Eine Untersuchung ihrer Voraussetzungen und Möglichkeiten. Vienna: Springer.
Newton, Isaac. 1704. Opticks Or, A treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light. Also Two treatises of the Species and Magnitude of Curvilinear Figures. London [New York: Dover, 1952].
Piotrowski, Suzanne J., ed. 2010. Transparency and Secrecy. A Reader Linking Literature and Contemporary Debate. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
Pitkin, Hannah. 1990. Slippery Bentham. Some Neglected Cracks in the Foundation of Utilitarianism. In Jeremy Bentham. Critical Assessments, ed. Bhiku Pareth, vol. 3: Laws and Politics, London and New York: Routledge 1993, 534–560.
Pollitt, Christopher, and Peter Hupe. 2011. Talking About Government. The Role of Magic Concepts. Public Management Review 13: 641–658.
Pozen, David. 2018. Transparency’s Ideological Drift. Yale Law Journal 128 (forthcoming)
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1995. The Confessions and Correspondence, including the letters to Malesherbes. Trans. Christopher Kelly, The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 5, Hanover: New England.
Rowe, Colin, and Robert Slutzky. 1964. ‘Transparency: Literal and Phenomenal,’ Transparency. Ed. B. Hoesli. Basel-Boston-Berlin: Birkhäuser, 1997: 21–56.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1975. Sartre at Seventy: An Interview with Michel Contat. Trans. Paul Auster and Lydia Davis, New York Review of Books, August 7, 1975, 10–17.
Starobinski, Jean. 1972 [1988]. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vasiliu, Anca. 1997. Du diaphane. Paris: Vrin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alloa, E. (2018). Transparency: A Magic Concept of Modernity. In: Alloa, E., Thomä, D. (eds) Transparency, Society and Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77160-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77161-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)