Skip to main content

Virtual Transparency: From the Panopticon to the Expository Society and Beyond

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transparency, Society and Subjectivity
  • 805 Accesses

Abstract

In a previous book, Exposed: Desire and Disobedience in the Digital Age (2015), Bernard Harcourt explored our new digital age and its many seductions—how our own desires to take selfies, post Snapchats, and stream NetFlix unwittingly feed the surveillance machinery of the NSA, Google, Facebook, etc. Harcourt argued that we have entered an “expository society” where we increasingly exhibit ourselves online and freely give away our most personal data. While this remains true, the relation of our digital exposure to the more violent practices associated with the war on terrorism requires more detailed attention. By starting in 1973, when Foucault delivers his lectures on “The Punitive Society,” the chapter begins to explore what lies beyond the expository society by focusing on how our expository techniques of surveillance relate to our new counterinsurgency warfare paradigm of governing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As a physician, Julius “worked on the staff of poorhouses and in the military” (Johnston 2000: 180 n.47). Julius was also a noted prison reformer (Singer and Adler 1916: 392).

  2. 2.

    Julius lectured in Berlin in 1827 “under the auspices of the newly formed Verein für die Besserung der Stafgefangen, a prisoners’ aid society” (Johnston 2000: 180 n.47).

  3. 3.

    I will use sécurité to refer to the term Foucault originally coined and later renamed gouvernementalité, and will reserve the term “governm entality” to refer to later work that is generally referred to as his “govern mentality studies.”

  4. 4.

    Special thanks to François Ewald who pointed me to this passage from the interview in April 2013 (e-mail on file with author).

  5. 5.

    For the conventional definition of literal transparency and the contrast with phenomenal transparency, (see Rowe and Slutzky 1963), and (see Rowe and Slutzky 1971). For a contextualization of these texts, see (Mertins 1996; Krauss 1980; and Somol 1994). Special thanks to Jonah Rowen.

  6. 6.

    That is, for those who do not simply debunk the idea of phenomenal transparency as merely a hermeneutic phantom or as a ghost, see Krauss 1980; Martin 2010: 55–57; Martin 2003 ( discussing the shallowness and thinness of the transparency metaphor).

  7. 7.

    In Johnson’s glass house, it serves as the fireplace/chimney and the bathroom.

Works Cited

  • Balibar, Étienne. 2015. Lettre d’Étienne Balibar à l’éditeur du cours. In M. Foucault, Théories et institutions pénales. Cours au Collège de France, 1971–1972, ed. Bernard E. Harcourt, 285–289. Paris: Gallimard/Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barret-Kriegel, B., A. Thalamy, F. Beguin, and B. Fortier. 1979. Les Machines à guérir. Aux origines de l’hôpital moderne. Pierre Mardaga: Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Tony. 1988. The Exhibitionary Complex. New Formation 4 (Spring): 73–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1995. The Panopticon Writings, ed. Miran Božovič, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Jodi. 2012. The Communist Horizon. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, Guy. 1967. La Société du spectacle. Paris: Buchet/Chastel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, Kimberly. 2016. Anti-ISIS-Propaganda Czar’s Ninja War Plan: We Were Never Here. The Daily Beast, March 15, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/15/obama-s-new-anti-isis-czar-wants-to-use-algorithms-to-target-jihadis.html.

  • Duhigg, Charles. 2012. How Companies Learn Your Secrets. New York Times, February 16, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/magazine/shopping-habits.html.

  • Ericson, Richard V., and Kevin D. Haggerty. 2000. The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1968. Interview avec Michel Foucault. In M. Foucault, Dits et Écrits, ed. Daniel Defert, François Ewald and Jacques Lagrange, Paris: Gallimard, 1994, vol. I, no. 54: 651–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. La vérité et les formes juridiques. In M. Foucault, Dits et Écrits, Vol. II, no 139, ed. 1994: 538–623 [ed. 2001, vol. I: 1406–1491].

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. L’oeil du pouvoir. Entretien avec J.-P. Barou et M. Perrot. In Le Panoptique, éd. par J.-P Barou, Paris, Pierre Belfond, 1977; reproduced in Dits et Écrits, vol. III, no. 195, 1994: 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan, New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Dits et Écrits. Ed. Daniel Defert, François Ewald, and Jacques Lagrange. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Le Pouvoir psychiatrique. Cours au Collège de France, 1973–1974, éd. J. Lagrange, Paris, Gallimard/Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Sécurité, Territoire, Population. Cours au Collège de France. 1977–1978. Paris: Gallimard/Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. La Société Punitive. Cours au Collège de France, 1972–1973, ed. Bernard E. Harcourt, Paris: Gallimard/Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Surveiller et Punir. Naissance de la prison, ed. Bernard E. Harcourt, Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade, Vol. II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, Glenn. 2004. No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, Glenn, and Ewen MacAskill 2013. NSA Prism Program Taps in to User Data of Apple, Google and Others. The Guardian, June 6, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data.

  • Harcourt, Bernard E. 2018. The Counterrevolution: How our Government Went to War Against its Own Citizens. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. 1952. Author’s Preface. In Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, trans. T.M. Knox, London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Norman. 2000. Forms of Constraint: A History of Prison Architecture. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julius, N.H. 1831. Vorlesungen über die Gefängniskunde, Berlin: Stuhr, 1828, 2 vol., Leçons sur les prisons, présentées en forme de cours au public de Berlin, en l’année 1827, trans. (vol. I) H. Lagarmitte, Paris: F. G. Levrault.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1980. Death of a Hermeneutic Phantom. Architecture + Urbanism 112 (January): 189–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Reinhold. 2003. The Organizational Complex: Architecture, Media, and Corporate Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Utopia’s Ghost: Architecture and Postmodernism, Again. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mertins, Detlef. 1996. Transparency: Autonomy & Relationality. AA Files 32 (Autumn): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, Terence. 1995. Light Construction. New York: Harry N. Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, Colin, and Robert Slutzky. 1963. Transparency: Literal and Phenomenal. Perspecta 8: 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. Transparency: Literal and Phenomenal… Part II. Perspecta 13/14: 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1990. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Isidore, and Cyrus Adler. 1916. The Jewish Encyclopedia: A Descriptive Record of the History, Religion, Literature, and Customs of the Jewish People from the Earliest Times to the Present Day. Vol. 7. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, Daniel J. 2006. The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somol, Robert. 1994. Oublier Rowe. Formwork: Colin Rowe, ANY 7/8, 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidhyanathan, Siva (2011) The Googlization of Everything: (And Why We Should Worry), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidler, Anthony. 1992. The Architectural Uncanny: Essays in the Modern Unhomely. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, Linda M.G. 2005. “Philosophy’s Gaudy Dress”: Rhetoric and Fantasy in the Lockean Social Contract. European Journal of Political Theory 4: 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Shanyang. 2005. The Digital Self: Through the Looking Glass of Telecopresent Others. Symbolic Interaction 28 (3): 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard E. Harcourt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harcourt, B.E. (2018). Virtual Transparency: From the Panopticon to the Expository Society and Beyond. In: Alloa, E., Thomä, D. (eds) Transparency, Society and Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics