Abstract
The management of articular cartilage defects poses a complex challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. Developing an appropriate treatment plan requires a patient-centered approach with a thorough evaluation of a patient’s clinical history, physical exam, and imaging results. Many factors impact the appropriate treatment such as demographics, patient lifestyle, defect characteristics, and any concomitant pathology such as meniscal deficiency, malalignment, or instability. Once all factors are considered and surgical management is indicated, the chondral defect can be successfully treated with a variety of modalities including debridement, microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft transplant, or osteochondral allograft, among others. Concomitant pathology can be managed with either staged or combined procedures, but failure to address these additional pathologies predisposes the patient to treatment failure and symptomatic recurrence. There are several complicated scenarios that occur relatively common: concomitant meniscal deficiency and chondral defect; concomitant malalignment and chondral defect; concomitant ligamentous injury and chondral defect; concomitant malalignment, meniscal deficiency, and chondral defect; and chondral defect with history of failed cartilage surgery. When appropriately applied, cartilage repair and restoration surgery provide reliably successful outcomes in patients with symptomatic articular cartilage defects, even in the most complex cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Flanigan DC, et al. Prevalence of chondral defects in athletes’ knees: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(10):1795–801.
Farr J, Lewis P, Cole BJ. Patient evaluation and surgical decision making. J Knee Surg. 2004;17(4):219–28.
Carnes J, et al. Knee cartilage defects in a sample of older adults: natural history, clinical significance and factors influencing change over 2.9 years. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2012;20(12):1541–7.
Bekkers JE, Inklaar M, Saris DB. Treatment selection in articular cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(Suppl 1):148S–55S.
Steadman JR, et al. Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(5):477–84.
Knutsen G, et al. A randomized multicenter trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture: long-term follow-up at 14 to 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(16):1332–9.
Nuelle CW, et al. Patient factors, donor age, and graft storage duration affect osteochondral allograft outcomes in knees with or without comorbidities. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(2):179–84.
Ebert JR, et al. Factors predictive of outcome 5 years after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the tibiofemoral joint. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(6):1245–54.
DiBartola AC, et al. Clinical outcomes after autologous chondrocyte implantation in adolescents’ knees: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(9):1905–16.
Assenmacher AT, et al. Long-term outcomes after osteochondral allograft: a systematic review at long-term follow-up of 12.3 years. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(10):2160–8.
Gracitelli GC, et al. Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for isolated patellar cartilage injury. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):879–84.
Cameron JI, et al. Osteochondral allograft transplantation of the femoral trochlea. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(3):633–8.
Solheim E, et al. Results at 10-14 years after microfracture treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(5):1587–93.
Gobbi A, Karnatzikos G, Kumar A. Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(9):1986–96.
Pareek A, et al. Long-term outcomes after osteochondral autograft transfer: a systematic review at mean follow-up of 10.2 years. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(6):1174–84.
Meric G, et al. Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for bipolar reciprocal osteochondral lesions of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):709–14.
Gomoll AH, et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patella: a multicenter experience. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(5):1074–81.
Rue JP, et al. Prospective evaluation of concurrent meniscus transplantation and articular cartilage repair: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(9):1770–8.
Abrams GD, et al. Clinical results of combined meniscus and femoral osteochondral allograft transplantation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(8):964–70. e1
Weber AE, et al. Malalignment: a requirement for cartilage and organ restoration. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2016;24(2):e14–22.
Harris JD, et al. Biological knee reconstruction: a systematic review of combined meniscal allograft transplantation and cartilage repair or restoration. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(3):409–18.
Chhadia AM, et al. Are meniscus and cartilage injuries related to time to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1894–9.
Fok AW, Yau WP. Delay in ACL reconstruction is associated with more severe and painful meniscal and chondral injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(4):928–33.
Maffulli N, Binfield PM, King JB. Articular cartilage lesions in the symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(7):685–90.
Marti RK, et al. Proximal tibial varus osteotomy. Indications, technique, and five to twenty-one-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(2):164–70.
Bode G, et al. A non-randomized controlled clinical trial on autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle with or without high tibial osteotomy in patients with varus deformity of less than 5°. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(1):43–9.
Kahlenberg CA, et al. Analysis of outcomes for high tibial osteotomies performed with cartilage restoration techniques. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(2):486–92.
Harris JD, et al. Biological knee reconstruction for combined malalignment, meniscal deficiency, and articular cartilage disease. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(2):275–82.
Gomoll AH, et al. Triad of cartilage restoration for unicompartmental arthritis treatment in young patients: meniscus allograft transplantation, cartilage repair and osteotomy. J Knee Surg. 2009;22(2):137–41.
Gracitelli GC, et al. Fresh osteochondral allografts in the knee: comparison of primary transplantation versus transplantation after failure of previous subchondral marrow stimulation. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):885–91.
Gracitelli GC, et al. Osteochondral allograft transplantation for knee lesions after failure of cartilage repair surgery. Cartilage. 2015;6(2):98–105.
Chui K, Jeys L, Snow M. Knee salvage procedures: the indications, techniques and outcomes of large osteochondral allografts. World J Orthop. 2015;6(3):340–50.
Minas T, et al. Increased failure rate of autologous chondrocyte implantation after previous treatment with marrow stimulation techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):902–8.
Nawaz SZ, et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: mid-term to long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(10):824–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Christian, D.R., Oliver-Welsh, L., Yanke, A.B., Cole, B.J. (2018). Staging and Practical Issues in Complex Cases. In: Farr, J., Gomoll, A. (eds) Cartilage Restoration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77152-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77152-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77151-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77152-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)