Advertisement

Willingness to Pay for Malaria Prophylaxis in Ethiopia

  • Simon O. SonameEmail author
  • Garth J. Holloway
Chapter
Part of the Cooperative Management book series (COMA)

Abstract

In this chapter, we measure how much malaria impacts on farmers’ technical efficiency and the application of these values to present a reliable measure of the farmers’ Willingness-To-Pay for malaria abatement in Ethiopia. Malaria is one of the diseases that has prevented the African continent from achieving its main goal of food availability, security and sustainable development. One major problem policy makers seem to face all the time is the precise amount the households are willing to pay for a prophylactic measure. The epidemiology of the disease on the continent has made this measure difficult and adopting a stated preference approach has not been very helpful. Also, the link between malaria incidence and agricultural productivity has not been fully explored in the literature. We use a dataset from Ethiopia with the corresponding spatial malaria prevalence dataset from the Malaria Atlas Project. We apply this dataset to the envelope theorem to arrive at a reliable estimate of the Willingness-To-Pay and a measure of how much malaria affects farmers’ technical efficiency. The merger of the household dataset, with the spatial malaria dataset and the innovative use of the envelope theorem, is one of the major high points of this chapter. We apply Bayesian Econometrics to our empirical framework. The results show that in Ethiopia, malaria affects efficiency and has an a priori sign. The results further state that for a 100-unit increase in malaria, the household is willing to pay, on average, US$0.12 to purchase prophylactic measures. Policy makers can use these values to introduce minimum prices and gradual repayment schemes for prophylactic measures.

Keywords

Willingness-to-pay Household model Roy’s identity Bayesian analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Copies of the computer codes are available from Simon Soname at: ssoname@hotmail.com. The authors would like to thank the Malaria Atlas Project and the World Bank for providing the data used in this reserach. We also thank the anonymous referees for their useful comments. All errors are our responsibility.

References

  1. Abdulai, A., & Eberlin, R. (2001). Technical efficiency during economic reform in Nicaragua: Evidence from farm household survey data. Economic Systems, 25(2), 113–125. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362501000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W. (2000). Structural adjustment and economic efficiency of rice farmers in northern Ghana. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(3), 503–520. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/452608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afriat, S. N. (1972). Efficiency estimation of production functions. International Economic Review, 13(3), 568–598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2525845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aigner, D., Lovell, C., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ajani, O., & Ashagidigbi, W. (2008). Effect of malaria on rural households’ farm income in Oyo state, Nigeria. African Journal of Biomedical Research 11.Google Scholar
  6. Ajani, O., & Ugwu, P. (2008). Impact of adverse health on agricultural productivity of farmers in kainji basin north-central Nigeria using a stochastic production fron tier approach. Trends In Agricultural Economics, 1(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ajibefun, I. A. (2002). Analysis of policy issues in technical efficiency of small scale farmers using the stochastic frontier production function: With application to Nigerian farmers. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/7015/2/cp02aj01.pdf.
  8. Ajibefun, I. A., & Abdulkadri, A. O. (1999). An investigation of technical inefficiency of production of farmers under the national directorate of employment in Ondo state, Nigeria. Applied Economics Letters, 6(2), 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alvarez, A., & Arias, C. (2004). Technical efficiency and farm size: A conditional analysis. Agricultural Economics, 30(3), 241–250. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169515004000246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Amaza, P. S., & Olayemi, J. K. (2002). Analysis of technical inefficiency in food crop production in Gombe state, Nigeria. Applied Economics Letters, 9(1), 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Amos, T. (2007). An analysis of productivity and technical efficiency of smallholder cocoa farmers in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 15(2), 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Areal, F. J., Tiffin, R., & Balcombe, K. (2012). Farm technical efficiency under a tradable milk quota system. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(1), 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Asche, F., Roll, K. H., & Tveteras, R. (2009). Economic inefficiency and environmental impact: An application to aquaculture production. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Badiane, O., & Ulimwengu, J. (2013). Malaria incidence and agricultural efficiency in Uganda. Agricultural Economics, 44(1), 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Balcombe, K., Fraser, I., & Kim, J. H. (2006). Estimating technical efficiency of Australian dairy farms using alternative frontier methodologies. Applied Economics, 38(19), 2221–2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2), 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Battese, G. E., Coelli, T. J., & Colby, T. (1989). Estimation of frontier production functions and the efficiencies of Indian farms using panel data from ICRISAT’s village level studies, Department of Econometrics, University of New England.Google Scholar
  18. Battese, G. E., & Corra, G. S. (1977). Estimation of a production frontier model: With application to the pastoral zone of eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21(3), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Berger, A. N., Humphrey, D. B., & Pulley, L. B. (1996). Do consumers pay for one-stop banking? Evidence from an alternative revenue function. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(9), 1601–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bezemer, D., Balcombe, K., Davis, J., & Fraser, I. (2005). Livelihoods and farm efficiency in rural georgia. Applied Economics, 37(15), 1737–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Browning, M., & Meghir, C. (1991). The effects of male and female labor supply on commodity demands. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 925–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chavas, J.-P. (2006). Dynamic considerations in nutrition and food demand.Google Scholar
  23. Chen, L., Heerink, N., & van den Berg, M. (2006). Energy consumption in rural China: A household model for three villages in Jiangxi province. Ecological Economics, 58(2), 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen, Z., Huffman, W. E., & Rozelle, S. (2009). Farm technology and technical efficiency: Evidence from four regions in China. China Economic Review, 20(2), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chennareddy, V. (1967). Production efficiency in South Indian agriculture. Journal of Farm Economics, 49(4), 816–820. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1236938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coelli, T., Rahman, S., & Thirtle, C. (2003). A stochastic frontier approach to total factor productivity measurement in Bangladesh crop agriculture, 1961–92. Journal of International Development, 15(3), 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Croppenstedt, A., & Muller, C. (2000). The impact of farmers’ health and nutritional status on their productivity and efficiency: Evidence from Ethiopia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(3), 475–502. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/452607.
  28. Cullinane, K., Wang, T.-F., Song, D.-W., & Ji, P. (2006). The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(4), 354–374.Google Scholar
  29. Dalton, T. J. (2004). A household hedonic model of rice traits: economic values from farmers in West Africa. Agricultural Economics, 31(2–3), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (1995). Household modeling for the design of poverty alleviation strategies. Revue Economie du Developpement, 3, 3–23.Google Scholar
  31. Diewert, W. E. (1974). Functional forms for revenue and factor requirements functions. International Economic Review, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Doiron, D., & Kalb, G. (2004). Demands for childcare and household labour supply in Australia. Economic Records, 81(254), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dong, Y., Hamilton, R., & Tippett, M. (2014). Cost efficiency of the Chinese banking sector: A comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and data envelopment analysis. Economic Modelling, 36, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. El-Osta, H. S., Mishra, A. K., & Morehart, M. J. (2008). Off-farm labor participation decisions of married farm couples and the role of government payments. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 30(2), 311–332. http://aepp.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/2/311.abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2010). Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 320–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2343100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. (2001). The Abuja declaration and the plan of action. Abuja. http://www.rollbackmalaria.org/microsites/wmd2011/abuja_declaration_final.html.
  38. Feng, G., & Serletis, A. (2010). Efficiency, technical change, and returns to scale in large us banks: Panel data evidence from an output distance function satisfying theoretical regularity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(1), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goodwin, B. K., & Holt, M. T. (2002). Parametric and semiparametric modeling of the off-farm labor supply of agrarian households in transition Bulgaria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 184–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heltberg, R., Arndt, T. C., & Sekhar, N. U. (2000). Fuelwood consumption and forest degradation: A household model for domestic energy substitution in rural India. Land Economics, 76(2), 213–232. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3147225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holloway, G., & Tomberlin, D. (2007). Bayesian ranking and selection of fishing boat efficiencies. Marine Resource Economics, 21, 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Holloway, G., Tomberlin, D., & Irz, X. (2005). Hierarchical analysis of production efficiency in a coastal trawl fishery. In R. Scarpa & A. Alberini (Eds.), Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics in The economics of non-market goods and resources (Vol. 6, pp. 159–185). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huffman, W. E. (1980). Farm and off-farm work decisions: The role of human capital. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(1), 14–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1924268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huffman, W., & Lange, M. D. (1989). Off-farm work decisions of husbands and wives: Joint decision making. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(3), 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Humphrey, D. B., & Pulley, L. B. (1997). Banks’ responses to deregulation: Profits, technology, and efficiency. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jara-rojas, R., Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Moreira, V., & Da˜az, J. (2012). Natural resource conservation and technical efficiency from small-scale farmers in central Chile.Google Scholar
  47. Kebede, E., Gan, J., & Kagochi, J. M. (2016). Agriculture based energy for rural house-hold income and well-being: East African experience. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1650–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Key, N., Sadoulet, E., & Janvry, A. D. (2000). Transactions costs and agricultural house-hold supply response. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(2), 245–259. http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/content/82/2/245.abstract.
  49. Kopp, R. J., & Diewert, W. E. (1982). The decomposition of frontier cost function deviations into measures of technical and allocative efficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2–3), 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kumbhakar, S. C. (2001). Estimation of profit functions when profit is not maximum. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lau, L. J. (1972). Profit functions of technologies with multiple inputs and outputs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lofgren, H., & Robinson, S. (1999). Nonseparable farm household decisions in a computable general equilibrium model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(3), 663–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lopez, R. E. (1985). Structural implications of a class of flexible functional forms for profit functions. International Economic Review, 593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Loureiro, M. L. (2009). Farmers’ health and agricultural productivity. Agricultural Economics, 40(4), 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meeusen, W., & van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435–444. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2525757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muller, C., & Yan, H. (2016). Household fuel use in developing countries: Review of theory and evidence.Google Scholar
  57. Murillo-Zamorano, L. R. (2004). Economic efficiency and frontier techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(1), 33–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Muyanga, M., & Jayne, T. (2014a). Effects of rising rural population density on small-holder agriculture in Kenya. Food Policy, 48, 98–113.Google Scholar
  59. Muyanga, M., & Musyoka, P. (2014b). Household incomes and poverty dynamics in rural kenya: A panel data analysis. Journal of Poverty Alleviation and International Development, 5(2), 43–76.Google Scholar
  60. Nepal, A., Nelson, C. et al. (2015). Estimation of shadow wage in agricultural household model in Nepal. In: 2015 Conference, August 9–14, 2015, Milan, Italy, number 212527. International Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
  61. Newman, C., & Matthews, A. (2006). The productivity performance of Irish dairy farms 1984–2000: A multiple output distance function approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26(2), 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ogundele, O., & Okoruwa, V. (2006). Technical efficiency differentials in rice production technologies in Nigeria. Research Paper 154, AERC, Nairobi. http://www.aercafrica.org/documents/rp154.pdf.
  63. Omamo, S. W. (1998). Farm to market transaction costs and specialisation in small scale agriculture: Explorations with a non-separable household model. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(2), 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ray, S. C., & Das, A. (2010). Distribution of cost and profit efficiency: Evidence from Indian banking. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Riccardi, R., Oggioni, G., & Toninelli, R. (2012). Efficiency analysis of world cement industry in presence of undesirable output: Application of data envelopment analysis and directional distance function. Energy Policy, 44, 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruben, R., & van Ruijven, A. (2001). Technical coefficients for bio-economic farm house-hold models: A meta-modelling approach with applications for southern Mali. Ecological Economics, 36(3), 427–441. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800900002408.
  67. Saha, A., & Stroud, J. (1994). A household model of on-farm storage under price risk. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(3), 522–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Seyoum, E. T., Battese, G. E., & Fleming, E. M. (1998). Technical efficiency and productivity of maize producers in eastern Ethiopia: A study of farmers within and outside the Sasakawa-global 2000 project. Agricultural Economics, 19(3), 341–348. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169515098000371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shepard Ronald, W. (1953). Cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Siegel, D., Wright, M., Chapple, W., & Lockett, A. (2008). Assessing the relative performance of university technology transfer in the US and UK: A stochastic distance function approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(7–8), 717–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simtowe, F., & Zeller, M. (2006). The impact of access to credit on the adoption of hybrid maize in Malawi: An empirical test of an agricultural household model under credit market failure.Google Scholar
  72. Singh, I., Squire, L., & Strauss, J. (1986). Agricultural household models—Extension, applications and policy. Baltimore and London: For the World Bank: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Skoufias, E. (1994). Using shadow wages to estimate labor supply of agricultural house-holds. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(2), 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Soname, S. O. (2016). Effects of malaria on farmers’ technical efficiency in Africa. Ph.D. thesis at the University of Reading, UK.Google Scholar
  75. Tadesse, B., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (1997). Technical efficiency in paddy farms of Tamil Nadu: An analysis based on farm size and ecological zone. Agricultural Economics, 16(3), 185–192. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169515097000042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tomberlin, D., & Holloway, G. (2008). Bayesian hierarchical estimation of technical efficiency in a fishery. Applied Economics Letters, 17(2), 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ulimwengu, J. (2009). Farmers health and agricultural productivity in rural Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 3(2), 83–100.Google Scholar
  78. Ulimwengu, J. M. (2008). Farmers health and agricultural efficiency in rural Ethiopia: A stochastic production frontier approach.Google Scholar
  79. USAID—The Ethiopian Government. (2011). President’s malaria initiative: Ethiopia malaria operational plan fy2012. Technical Report, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  80. Wadud, A., & White, B. (2000). Farm household efficiency in Bangladesh: A comparison of stochastic frontier and DEA methods. Applied Economics, 32(13), 1665–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang, H., & Schmidt, P. (2002). One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Welsch, D. E. (1965). Response to economic incentive by Abakaliki rice farmers in eastern Nigeria. Journal of Farm Economics, 47(4), 900–914. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1236333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. W.H.O. (2007). Insecticide -treated mosquito nets: A W.H.O position statement. Technical report.Google Scholar
  84. Yotopoulos, P. A., Lau, L. J., & Lin, W.-L. (1976). Microeconomic output supply and factor demand functions in the agriculture of the province of Taiwan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(2), 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zieschang, K. D. (1983). A note on the decomposition of cost efficiency into technical and allocative components. Journal of Econometrics, 23(3), 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agri-Food EconomicsUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations