Advertisement

Role of Buffalo Production in Sustainable Development of Rural Regions

  • Ibrahim SolimanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cooperative Management book series (COMA)

Abstract

Rice is the main summer crop in Egypt. It is a cash exportable crop that provides a main source of income to the Egyptian farmers and the national economy. However, the farmers used to burn the rice straw at the farm borders and violate the law that forbids such action, which causes socio-economic negative externalities due to the generated smoke from burning. The smoke generated from burning is straw produced as byproduct of cultivated around 0.75 million ha of rice crop in Egypt, causes social costs due to the probability of premature-mortality and morbidity of rural and urban individuals and livestock. To conduct an economic assessment of such negative externalities a field research was conducted. A targeted ration of chopped rice-straw mixed with dissolved urea and molasses at 2% and 3% of weight, respectively, was fed to buffalo-feeder calves for meat production at 40% of the S.E. of the daily ration with a concentrate feed mix of 60% S.E. Such ration was compared with a control ration of dray chopped rice straw with the same proportion of concentrate feed mix. Two feed-response models were estimated for comparison of the two rations on the growth of the buffalo feeder calves for meat production. The Cobb-Douglas response function was the best fitted form according to the economic logic, significance of estimated parameters and the magnitude of R-2. The study derived the production elasticity, marginal daily gain, the value of marginal product from both estimated feed response functions. The economic marketing weight that maximizes the gross margin above the feed costs was estimated under the response model of treat rice straw feeding plan (targeted ration). It reached around 518 Kg live weight, while under the control ration it was only around 384 Kg. The larger market weight of treated rice straw ration was due to higher production elasticity, faster marginal daily gain, better marginal feed conversion and higher palatability of the ration than the control one. Egypt imports of red meat reached about 600 million dollars, due to lack of sufficient feed supply that constrained expansion in red meat production. Therefore, providing treated rice straw feed would provide additional source of livestock feeds which would provide additional 80,000 tons’ carcass weight from fed buffalo calves, which currently are slaughtered as rearing veal calves (60-80 days old). The estimated income generated from one buffalo fed calves reached 50% of the average annual per capita income in Egypt. Such program would also stop the social costs stems from probable premature death and/or morbidity of human and livestock when burning rice straw. The study presented a proposed institutional program to introduce such technology into Egyptian agricultural sector.

Keywords

Externalities of burning rice Straw Recycling of treated rice straw as feed Buffalo-Feed response function Least cost ration of alternative feeding systems Most Profitable marketing weight 

References

  1. Akter, M., Asad uzzaman, M., Hossain M. M., & Asad, L. (2015). Utilization of urea and urease treated rice straw by indigenous growing cattle. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 5(3), 529–535.Google Scholar
  2. Central bank of Egypt. (2015). Monthly bulletin, January 2015. Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  3. Chemjong, P. B. (1991) Economic value of urea-treated straw fed to lactating buffaloes during the dry season in Nepal. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Devendra, D., & Sevilla, C. (2002). Availability and use of feed resources in crop–animal systems in Asia. Agricultural Systems, 71(1–2), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobermann, A., & Fairhurst, T. H. (2002, May). Rice straw management. Better Crops International, 16, special supplement, 1–7.Google Scholar
  6. Duc Vu, D., Cuong, L. X., Dung, C. A., & Ho Hai, P. (1999). Use of urea–molasses–multi-nutrient block and urea-treated rice straw for improving dairy cattle productivity in Vietnam. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 38(2–3), 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El Asheeri, A. K. (2012). Economic return of fattening baladi and buffalo calves under prevailing feeding system in Egypt. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 3(1), 21–28. Mansoura Univ.Google Scholar
  8. FAOSTAT. (2015). FAO Statistics division, 25 January 2015, <fao.org>.Google Scholar
  9. Hazell, P. B. R., Perez, N., Siam, G., & Soliman, I. (1995). Impact of the structural adjustment program on agricultural production and resource use in Egypt. EPTD Discussion Paper No. 10, Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. USA.Google Scholar
  10. Helal, F. I. S., Abdel Rahman, K. M., Ahmed, B. M., & Omar, S. S. (2011). Effect of feeding different levels of concentrates on buffalo calves performance, digestibility and carcass traits. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science, 10(2), 186–192.Google Scholar
  11. Ibrahim, M. A. R. (2012). Water buffalo for our next generation in Egypt and in the world. Scientific Papers, Animal Science, Series D, LV, CD-ROM ISSN 2285-5769, ISSN-L 2285-5750. University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Faculty of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Hungary.Google Scholar
  12. Intriligator, M. (1978). Econometric models, techniques and applications. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins, B. M., Baxter, L. Jr, Miles, T. R., & Miles, T. R. (1999). Combustion properties of biomass. Retrieved March, 1, 1999, Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.Google Scholar
  14. Launio, C. C. Asis, C. A., Manalili Jr., R. G. & Javier, E. F. (2013). Economic analysis of rice straw management alternatives and understanding farmers’ choices. A Research Project Report, Published By World Fish (ICLARM)—Economy and Environment Program For Southeast Asia (EEPSEA) Philippines Office, World Fish Philippines, Country Office, Earca Bldg., College, Los Baños, Laguna 4031 Philippines.Google Scholar
  15. Naik, P. K., Mendiratta, S. K., Laxmanan, V., Mehra, Usha R., & Dass, R. S. (2004). Effect of feeding ammoniated wheat straw treated with and without hydrochloric acid on meat quality and various sensory attributes of growing male buffalo calves. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 17(4), 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nelson, R. L., Thor, P. K., & Heaton, C. R. (1980). Rice straw burning alternative policy implications. California Agriculture, Issue of February, 1–9.Google Scholar
  17. Rahman, M. A., Alam, A. M. M. N., & Shahjalal, M. (2009). Supplementation of urea-molasses-straw based diet with different levels of concentrate for fattening of bulls. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 12(13), 970–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Soliman, I. (1995). A model for the appraisal of the environmental impacts of the projects. In Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Environmental Protection is a Must. The National Institute Of Oceanography And Fisheries, Social Development Fund, Europe-Arab Cooperation Center, Alex, April 25–27th.Google Scholar
  19. Soliman, I. (2004). The role of rural women in labor and decision making for buffalo enterprise in Egyptian agriculture. In Proceedings of 7th World Buffalo Congress, International Buffalo Federation (Vol. 2, P777–783), Manila, Philippine.Google Scholar
  20. Soliman, I. (2006). Dairy buffalo on small farm the approach towards rural development. In Proceedings of the 5th Asian Buffalo Congress on Social Economic Contribution of Buffalo to Rural Areas, April 18–22, 2006, Nanning, China.Google Scholar
  21. Soliman, I., & Nawar, M. (1986). Feed use pattern for livestock on the Egyptian farm. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of Animal Production (pp. 290–304), Organized By The Egyptian Society of Animal Production In Collaboration With the Ministry of Agriculture of Egypt, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, Held At The Egyptian International Center For Agriculture, Cairo.Google Scholar
  22. Tengyun, G. (2000). Review: Treatment and utilization of crop straw and Stover in China. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 12(1).Google Scholar
  23. Trach, N. X. (1998). The need for improved utilization of rice straw as feed for ruminants in Vietnam: An overview. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 10(2).Google Scholar
  24. World Bank. (2013). Development Indicators. Wash D. C., USA: Bank Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural Economics, Faculty of AgricultureZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt

Personalised recommendations