Advertisement

Towards a More Democratic and Sustainable Food System: The Reflexive Nature of Solidarity Purchase Groups and the Migrants’ Social Cooperative “Barikamà” in Rome

  • Daniela BernaschiEmail author
  • Giacomo Crisci
Chapter
Part of the Cooperative Management book series (COMA)

Abstract

Food insecurity, poverty and migration emergencies are the biggest challenges that all modern societies have to deal with. The aim of this paper is to explore the role played by civil society in dealing with these issues through a reflexive approach. Starting from addressing the multidimensional nature of food security, this deliverable comes to adopt the concept of a “democratic and sustainable food system”. This change of focus allows to encompass all the complementary issues: e.g. poverty reduction, environmental sustainability, social equity and social integration. Due to the complex nature of the matter, not only a strong local and global coordination is needed but also a reflexive approach. After introducing the concept of reflexivity, this paper addresses the crucial role that civil society organizations may play in the transition towards a more democratic and sustainable food system, focusing on solidarity purchase groups in Italy. In particular, this deliverable spotlights the collaboration between solidarity purchase groups (Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale—GAS-in Italian) and the migrants’ social cooperative “Barikamà” in Rome. That shows an interesting example of how civil society organizations may cope with poverty reduction, social integration and sustainability.

Keywords

Democratic and sustainable food system Civil society organizations Migrants’ social cooperative 

References

  1. Amnesty International. (2014). Exploited labour two years on: the “Rosarno Law” fails to protect migrants exploited in the agricultural sector in Italy. London, UK: Amnesty International Publication.Google Scholar
  2. Arcuri, S., Brunori, G., Bartolini, F., & Galli, F. (2015, June). “La sicurezza alimentare come diritto: per un approccio sistemico.” Agriregionieuropa, Year 11 (Vol. 41).Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, UK: SAGE.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (2003). La società cosmopolita. Prospettive dell’epoca postnazionale. Bologna, Italia: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  5. Bernaschi, D. (2013). Analisi delle condizioni di vita e di lavoro dei migranti nell’area del Casertano. Tra sfruttamento lavorativo e privazioni delle basic capabilities. Master’s thesis in Human Development Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Bonvin, J. M., Dif-Pradalier, M., & Moachon, E. (2013). A capability approach to restructuring processes, lessons from a Swiss and a French case study. Lausanne, Switzerland: CESCAP, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland.Google Scholar
  7. Brovia, C. (2008). In the iron grip of the Caporali: seasonal workers on tomato farms in Apulia; Sous La Férule Des Caporali. Les Saisonniers De La Tomate Dans Les Pouilles. Etudes Rurales, 182(2), 153–166.Google Scholar
  8. Burchi, F., De Muro, P. (2012). A human development and capability approach to food security: Conceptual framework and informational basis. United Nations Development Programme, WP 2012-009, February 2012.Google Scholar
  9. Campiglio, L., & Rovati, G. (2009). La povertà alimentare in Italia: Prima indagine quantitativa e qualitativa. Milano, Italia: Guerini e associati.Google Scholar
  10. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The system view of life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coldiretti. (2014). Crisi: Coldiretti, spesa di gruppo per 2, 7 mln italiani (+400%). Retrieved June 21, 2017 from http://www.coldiretti.it/News/Pagine/672–%E2%80%93-12-Ottobre-2014.aspx.
  12. Crespi, F. (1994). Imparare ad esistere. Nuovi fondamenti della solidarietà sociale. Roma, Italia: Donzelli.Google Scholar
  13. Crespi, F. (2013). Esistenza-come-realtà. Contro il predominio dell’economia. Salerno, Italia: Orthotes.Google Scholar
  14. Crisci, G., & Fonte, M. (2014). L’accesso al bio nella transizione verso la sostenibilità dei sistemi agro-alimentari. Agriregionieuropa, year 10(37).Google Scholar
  15. Daily, G., et al. (1998). Food production: Population growth, and the environment. Science, 281, 12–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahrendorf, R. (1998). Il conflitto sociale nella modernità. Roma-Bari, Italia: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
  17. Diara, S., Crisci, G., & Fonte, M. (2015). “Barikamà: resistance through food”. In Proceedings of Second International Conference on Agriculture in an Urbanizing Society: Reconnecting Agriculture and Food Chains to Societal Needs, 14–15 September 2015. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  18. Dowler, E., & Lambie-Mumford, H. (2015). Introduction: Hunger, food and social policy in austerity. Social Policy and Society, 14(3), 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1989). Hunger and public action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Duncan, J. (2015). Greening global food governance. Canadian Food Studies, 2(2), 335–344.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, R., Ranson, S., & Strain, M. (2002). Reflexivity: Towards a theory of lifelong learning. International Journal Lifelong Education, 21(6), 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ethical Trading Initiative. (2015). Due diligence in agricultural supply chains: Counteracting exploitation of migrant workers in Italian tomato production. Joint Ethical Trading Initiatives, Norway.Google Scholar
  23. Eurostat. (2015). People at risk of poverty or social exclusion. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/People_at_risk_of_poverty_or_social_exclusion.
  24. Feindt, P. (2010). Reflexive governance of global public goods: multi-level and multi-referential governance in agriculture policy. In Brousseau, E., et al. (Eds.), Reflexive governance for public goods. Boston, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Food and Agriculture Organization. (1996). Rome declaration on world food security and world food summit plan of action. In Proceedings of World Summit on Food Security, FAO. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  26. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2006). World agriculture: Towards 2030/2050 Interim report prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups. Interim Report, FAO: Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  27. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013a). Food wastage footprint. Impacts on natural resources. Summary Report, FAO. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  28. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013b). Food balance sheets. Statistics Division, Rome, Italy. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS/visualize.
  29. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2015). The state of food insecurity in the world 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: Taking stock of uneven progress. Report, FAO. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  30. Fonte, M., & Salvioni. (2013). Cittadinanza ecologica e consumo sostenibile: dal biologico ai Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale. In Corrado, A., & Sivini, S. (Eds.), Cibo locale. Percorsi innovativi nelle pratiche di produzione e consumo alimentare. Napoli, Italy: Liguori.Google Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, J. I., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., et al. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327, 812–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodman, D., & DuPuis, E. M. (2002). Knowing food and growing food: Beyond the production–consumption debate in the sociology of agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gottschick, M. (2013). Reflexive capacity in local networks for sustainable development: integrating conflict and understanding into a multi-level perspective transition framework. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 1–22.Google Scholar
  35. Grasseni, C., Forno, F., & Signori, S. (2013). Beyond alternative food networks an agenda for comparative analysis of Italy’s solidarity purchase groups (GAS) and districts of solidarity economy (DES) vis-à-vis US Community Economies. In Proceedings of UNRISD Conference, Potential and Limits of Social and Solidarity Economy. Geneva, Switzerland, 6–8 May 2013.Google Scholar
  36. Guthman, J. (2007). The polanyan way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode, 39(3), 456–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hazell, P., & Wood, S. (2008). Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. IPCC. (2014). Climate change, impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Retrieved June 21, 2017 from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/.
  39. Isin, E. F. (2009). Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen. In Subjectivity, 29, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keane, J. (2003). Global civil society?. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lang, T., & Barling, D. (2012). Food security and food sustainability: Reformulating the debate. The Geographical Journal, 178(4), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leonardi, L. (2001). La dimensione sociale della globalizzazione. Rome, Italy: Carocci.Google Scholar
  43. Lush, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  44. Magatti, M. (2005). Il potere istituente della società civile. Rome, Italy: Laterza.Google Scholar
  45. Maino F., Lodi Rizzini, C., & Bandera, L. (2016). Povertà alimentare in Italia: le risposte del secondo welfare. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  46. Maslen, C., Raffle, A., Marriott, S., & Smith, N. (2013). Food poverty: What does the evidence tell us? Food Poverty Report, Bristol City Council, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  47. Marsden, T. (2013). From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marsden, T., & Sonnino, R. (2012). Human health and wellbeing and the sustainability of urban-regional food systems. Current Opinion Environmental Sustainability, 4(4), 427–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Monzini, P. (2007). Sea-border crossings: The organization of irregular migration to Italy. Journal of Mediterranean politics, 12(2), 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies (Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 1969–1990), October 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oliveri, F. A. (2015). Network of resistances against a multiple crisis: SOS Rosarno and the experimentation of socio-economic alternative models. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8(2), 504–529.Google Scholar
  52. Pimbert, M., Tran-Thanh, K., Deléage, E., Reinert, M., Trehet, C., & Bennet, E. (2006). Farmers’ views on the future of food and small scale producers. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  53. Pugliese, E., de Filippo, E., De Stefano, D., Dolente, F., Oliviero, L., & Pisacane, L. (2012). Diritti Violati, Indagine sulle condizioni di vita dei lavoratori immigrati in aree rurali del Sud Italia e sulle violazioni dei loro diritti umani e sociali. Napoli, Italy: Dedalus Cooperativa.Google Scholar
  54. Pulcini, E. (2009). La cura del mondo. Paura e responsabilità nell’età globale. Torino, Italy: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  55. Renting, H., Marsden, T. K., & Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning, 35, 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Retegas. (1999). Documento base dei GAS. I Gruppi di Acquisto Solidali. Un modo diverso di fare la spesa. Retrieved June 21, 2017 from www.retegas.org/upload/dl/doc/GASDocumentoBase.pdf.
  57. Savioli, A., Crisci, G., & Fonte, M. (2015). Il Papavero: The butterfly laboratory and the financial strength of solidarity economy. In Proceedings of Second International Conference on Agriculture in an Urbanizing Society: Reconnecting Agriculture and Food Chains to Societal Needs, 14–15 September 2015. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  58. Schifani, G., & Migliore, G. (2011). Solidarity purchase groups and the new critical and ethical consumer trends: First result of a direct study in Sicily. New Medit, 11(3), 26–33.Google Scholar
  59. Sen, A. K. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sen, A. K. (1995). Inequality reexamined. Harvard, USA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Sen, A. K. (2000a). Freedom, rationality, and social choice: The arrow lectures and other essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sen, A. K. (2000b). Food entitlements and agricultural production. In Proceedings of Doctoral Lecture, 30 November 2000. University of Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  64. Sen, A. K. (2012). The snakes and ladders of europe. The economic system we need, 10 May 2012.Google Scholar
  65. Shetty, P. (2015). From food security to food and nutrition security: Role of agriculture and farming systems for nutrition. Current Science, 109(3), 456–461.Google Scholar
  66. Sonnino, R., Moragues Faus, A., & Maggio, A. (2014). Sustainable food security: An emerging research and policy agenda. International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 21(1), 173–188.Google Scholar
  67. Sonnino, R. (2016). The new geography of food security: Exploring the potential of urban food strategies. The Geographical Journal, 182(2), 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sonnino, R., & Hanmer, O. (2016). Beyond food provision: Understanding community growing in the context of food poverty. Geoforum, 74, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stirling, A. (2009). Direction, distribution and diversity! pluralising progress in innovation, sustainability and development. In STEPS Working Paper 32. Brighton, UK: STEPS Centre, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  70. United Nations. (1974). Universal Declaration on the Eradication of Hunger and Malnutrition. In World Food Conference General Assembly, 5–16 November 1974. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  71. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In 70th Session of the General Assembly United Nations, 25–27 September 2015, United Nations Headquarters. New York, USA.Google Scholar
  72. Voss, J. -P., Kemp, R. (2005). Reflexive governance for sustainable development—Incorporating feedback in social problem solving. In Proceedings of IHDP Open Meeting, 9–13 October 2005. Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  73. Voss, J. P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Voss, J. -P., & Bornemann, B. (2011). The politics of reflexive governance: Challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society, 16(2), Art. 9.Google Scholar
  75. Wolff, F. (2006). The transformation of agriculture: Reflexive governance for agrobiodiversity. In J. -P. Voss, D. Baukecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 383–416). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Eds.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political and Social SciencesUniversity of Florence and TurinFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Planning and GeographyCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations