Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Target-Based and Entity-Based Opinion Extraction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2017)

Abstract

Opinion target extraction is a crucial task of opinion mining, aiming to extract occurrences of the different entities of a corpus that are subjects of an opinion. In order to produce a readable and comprehensible opinion summary, which is the main application of opinion target extraction, these occurrences are consolidated at the entity level in a second task. In this paper we argue that combining the two tasks, i.e. extracting opinion targets using entities as labels instead of binary labels, yields better results for opinion target extraction. We compare the binary approach and the multi-class approach on available datasets in English and French, and conduct several investigation experiments to explain the promising results. Our experiment show that an entity-based labelling not only improves opinion extraction in a single domain setting, but also let us combine training data from different domains to improve the extraction, a result that has never been achieved on target-based training data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://alt.qcri.org/semeval2016/task5/.

  2. 2.

    https://taku910.github.io/crfpp/.

References

  1. Jakob, N., Gurevych, I.: Extracting opinion targets in a single- and cross-domain setting with conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2010, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 1035–1045 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Springer, Boston (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pontiki, M., Galanis, D., Pavlopoulos, J., Papageorgiou, H., Androutsopoulos, I., Manandhar, S.: Semeval-2014 task 4: aspect based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of SemEval 2014, Dublin, Ireland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, F., Pan, S., Jin, O., Yang, Q., Zhu, X.: Cross-domain co-extraction of sentiment and topic lexicons. In: Proceedings of ACL 2010, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 410–419 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton, W.L., Clark, K., Leskovec, J., Jurafsky, D.: Inducing domain-specific sentiment lexicons from unlabeled corpora (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02820

  6. Hatzivassiloglou, V., McKeown, K.R.: Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In: Proceedings of ACL 1997, Madrid, Spain, pp. 174–181 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of KDD 2004, Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 68–177 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, S.M., Hovy, E.: Determining the sentiment of opinions. In: Proceedings of COLING 2004, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 1367 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bethard, S., Yu, H., Thornton, A., Hatzivassiloglou, V., Jurafsky, D.: Automatic extraction of opinion propositions and their holders. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2004, Palo Alto, CA, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Popescu, A.M., Etzioni, O.: Extracting product features and opinion from reviews. In: Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP 2005, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 339–346 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, B., Hu, M., Cheng, J.: Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In: Proceedings of WWW 2005, Chiba, Japan, pp. 342–351 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, S.M., Hovy, E.: Extracting opinions, opinion holders, and topics expressed in online news media text. In: Proceedings of SST 2006, Sydney, Australia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mukherjee, A., Liu, B.: Aspect extraction through semi-supervised modeling. In: Proceedings of ACL 2012, Jeju Island, Korea, pp. 339–348 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi, N., Inui, K., Matsumoto, Y.: Opinion mining from web documents: extraction and structurization. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Artif. Intell. 22, 227–238 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding, X., Liu, B., Yu, P.S.: A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In: Proceedings of WSDM 2008, Palo Alto, CA, USA, pp. 231–240 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pontiki, M., Galanis, D., Papageorgiou, H., Manandhar, S., Androutsopoulos, I.: Semeval-2015 task 12: aspect based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of SemEval 2015, Denver, CO, USA, pp. 486–495 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pontiki, M., et al.: Semeval-2016 task 5: aspect based sentiment analysis, San Diego, CA, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lafferty, J.D., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N.: Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of ICML 2001, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 282–289 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Breck, E., Choi, Y., Cardie, C.: Identifying expressions of opinion in context. IJCAI 7, 2683–2688 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis, D.D., Gale, W.A.: A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 1994, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 3–12 (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Lark .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lark, J., Morin, E., Peña Saldarriaga, S. (2018). A Comparative Study of Target-Based and Entity-Based Opinion Extraction. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77115-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77116-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics