Skip to main content

Text Similarity Function Based on Word Embeddings for Short Text Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10761))

Abstract

We present the Contextual Specificity Similarity (CSS) measure, a new document similarity measure based on word embeddings and inverse document frequency. The idea behind the CSS measure is to score higher the documents that include words with close embeddings and frequency of usage. This paper provides a comparison with several methods of text classification, which will evince the accuracy and utility of CSS in k-nearest neighbour classification tasks for short texts.

We experimentally confirmed that CSS performed excellent in the short text classification task as have been intended, outperforming traditional methods as well as WMD, the most recently proposed method.

This work was carried out while the first author was in a research internship at Yahoo! JAPAN Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In practice we will implement the cosine similarity as the dot product without normalization, since the word vectors obtained from word2vec have a modulus close to 1, and making the whole calculation would increase the complexity to the algorithm while not improving the results.

  2. 2.

    http://terrier.org/.

  3. 3.

    Due to calculations limits (memory error), the WMD distance was only calculated for the set of 1,000 articles.

References

  1. Greene, D., Cunningham, P.: Practical solutions to the problem of diagonal dominance in kernel document clustering. In: Machine Learning, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Conference (ICML 2006), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 25–29 June 2006, pp. 377–384 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schölkopf, B., Weston, J., Eskin, E., Leslie, C., Noble, W.S.: A kernel approach for learning from almost orthogonal patterns. In: Elomaa, T., Mannila, H., Toivonen, H. (eds.) ECML 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2430, pp. 511–528. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36755-1_44

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kusner, M.J., Sun, Y., Kolkin, N.I., Weinberger, K.Q.: From word embeddings to document distances. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2015, Lille, France, 6–11 July 2015, pp. 957–966 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR abs/1301.3781 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 24, 513–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S.: Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In: Croft, B.W., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds.) SIGIR 1994, pp. 232–241. Springer, London (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis, D.D.: An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1992, pp. 37–50. ACM, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, D.D.: Evaluating and optimizing autonomous text classification systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1995, pp. 246–254. ACM, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ontrup, J., Ritter, H.J.: Hyperbolic self-organizing maps for semantic navigation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, Neural Information Processing Systems: Natural and Synthetic, NIPS 2001, 3–8 December 2001, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 1417–1424 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brochu, E., de Freitas, N.: "Name that song!" A probabilistic approach to querying on music and text. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15, Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS 2002, 9–14 December 2002, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 1505–1512 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval 2, 1–135 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quadrianto, N., Smola, A.J., Song, L., Tuytelaars, T.: Kernelized sorting. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32, 1809–1821 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harman, D.: Overview of the first TREC conference. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1993, pp. 36–47. ACM, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.: A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to information retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22, 179–214 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, Z.: Structual Linguistics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schütze, H.: Automatic word sense discrimination. Comput. Linguist. 24, 97–123 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41, 391–407 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2013, Proceedings of a meeting held 5–8 December 2013, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, K., et al.: Overview of CLIR task at the third NTCIR workshop. In: Proceedings of the Third NTCIR Workshop on Research in Information Retrieval, Automatic Text Summarization and Question Answering, NTCIR-3, Tokyo, Japan, 8–10 October 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrián Jiménez Pascual .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jiménez Pascual, A., Fujita, S. (2018). Text Similarity Function Based on Word Embeddings for Short Text Analysis. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77113-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77113-7_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77112-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77113-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics