Benefits of Establishing Makerspaces in Distributed Development Environment

  • Basit Shahzad
  • Kashif Saleem
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 738)

Abstract

Makerspace is an innovative concept of working in a community based, semi-organized groups working to tinker, design, fabricate or develop, and market the ideas. The involvement of the community is vital to the success of every application of the makerspace concept. Some areas, like Science, Technology, Engineering, and Management (STEM) are among the extremely popular areas in the makerspace, while other popular areas include programming, and curriculum development. In such areas, where the community involvement is expected to be high, it is possible that the makerspace can’t accommodate all the individuals along with their equipment, at one place. Since the cost to develop the makerspace is high, we will be interested to see that how the small makerspaces can interact with the central makerspace to share the ideas and resources. In this paper, we investigate the popular areas of community involvement, opportunities and challenges in forming the distributed makerspaces, and also provide the analyses of their productivity in terms of problems solving, fabrication of small components, and software development. A model is proposed that provides a framework of conducting activities in distributed makerspaces and integrating the activities (project components) to form a product.

Keywords

Distributed makerspace model Franchise makerspace Concept commercialization 

References

  1. 1.
    R.S. Kurti, D. Kurti, L. Fleming, Practical implementation of an educational makerspace. Teach. Libr. 42, 20 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Colegrove, Editorial board thoughts: libraries as makerspace? Inf. Technol. Libr. 32, 2 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.S. Kurti, D.L. Kurti, L. Fleming, The philosophy of educational makerspaces part 1 of making an educational makerspace. Teach. Libr. 41, 8 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.N. Okpala, D. Baker, Making a makerspace case for academic libraries in Nigeria. New Libr. World 117, 568–586 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Pryor, Implementing a 3D printing service in an academic library. J. Libr. Adm. 54, 1–10 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Brady, C. Salas, A. Nuriddin, W. Rodgers, M. Subramaniam, MakeAbility: Creating accessible makerspace events in a public library. Public Libr. Q. 33, 330–347 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I.L. Craddock, Makers on the move: a mobile makerspace at a comprehensive public high school. Libr. Hi Tech 33, 497–504 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Fontichiaro, Sustaining a makerspace. Teach. Libr. 43, 39 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Gaved, I. Jowers, D. Dallison, G. Elliott-Cirigottis, A. Rochead,M. Craig, Online Distributed Prototyping Through a University-Makerspace Collaboration (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Krebs, Manufacturing expertise for the people: the open-source hardware movement in Japan, in Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings (2014), pp. 20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Boyle, M. Collins, R. Kinsey, C. Noonan, A. Pocock, Making the case for creative spaces in Australian libraries. Aust. Libr. J. 65, 30–40 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Hira, C.H. Joslyn, M.M. Hynes, Classroom makerspaces: identifying the opportunities and challenges, in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (2014), pp. 1–5 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Piaget, To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education (1973)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Papert, The Connected Family: Bridging the Digital Generation Gap Longstreet Press (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. McCosker, S. Vivienne, A. Johns, Civic Practices, Design, and Makerspaces Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Sleigh, H. Stewart, K. Stokes, Open Dataset of UK Makerspaces: a User’s Guide (Nesta, London, 2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Smith, M. Fressoli, H. Thomas, Grassroots innovation movements: challenges and contributions. J. Clean. Prod. 63, 114–124 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Söderberg, A. Delfanti, Hacking hacked! The life cycles of digital innovation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 40, 793 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Shahzad, E. Alwagait, Best and the worst times to tweet: an experimental study, in 15th International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Business and Economics (MCBE '14) (2014), pp. 122–126Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Alwagait, B. Shahzad, Maximization of Tweet’s viewership with respect to time, in 2014 World Symposium on Computer Applications & Research (WSCAR) (2014), pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Alwagait, B. Shahzad, When are tweets better valued? An empirical study. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 20, 1511–1521 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. Shahzad, E. Alwagait, S. Alim, Impact of change in weekend days on social networking culture in Saudi Arabia, in 2014 International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) (2014), pp. 553–558Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Shahzad, E. Alwagait, S. Alim, I. Resaercher, Investigating the relationship between social media usage and students’ grades in Saudi Arabia: a mixed method approach, in Recent Advances in Electrical Engineering and Educational Technologies (2015), pp.211–214Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Alwagait, B. Shahzad, S. Alim, Impact of social media usage on students academic performance in Saudi Arabia. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 1092–1097 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. Kostakis, V. Niaros, G. Dafermos, M. Bauwens, Design global, manufacture local: exploring the contours of an emerging productive model. Futures 73, 126–135 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. Moorefield-Lang, Change in the making: makerspaces and the ever-changing landscape of libraries. TechTrends 59, 107–112 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.J. Burke, Makerspaces: A practical guide for librarians, vol vol. 8 (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, 2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Simons, The LA Makerspace and the role of citizen science in education. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 113, 114–115 (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Slatter, Z. Howard, A place to make, hack, and learn: makerspaces in Australian public libraries. Aust. Libr. J. 62, 272–284 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    N. Taylor, U. Hurley, P. Connolly, Making community: the wider role of makerspaces in public life, in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), pp. 1415–1425Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    T.A. Faruquie, H.P. Karanam, M.K. Mohania, L.V. Subramaniam, G. Venkatachaliah, Resources Management in Distributed Computing Environment, Google Patents, 2015Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    W.M. Wong, M.C. Hui, Method and System for Modeling and Analyzing Computing Resource Requirements of Software Applications in a Shared and Distributed Computing Environment, Google Patents, 2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basit Shahzad
    • 1
  • Kashif Saleem
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering & CSNational University of Modern LanguagesIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Center of Excellence in Information Assurance, King Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations