A Survey on Adoption Good Practices for ICT Governance at Enhanced Organizations

  • Marianne Batista Diniz da Silva
  • Alef Menezes dos Santos
  • Michel dos Santos Soares
  • Rogério Patrício Chagas do Nascimento
  • Isabel Dillmann Nunes
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 738)

Abstract

Governance in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is a relevant area of research and practice. The Audit Court of the Union (ACU) periodically evaluates all Brazilian Federal Public Organizations in order to disseminate the importance of implementing good governance system and raising awareness of positive contribution of adopting Good Practices. As a result of these evaluations, it is clear that evolution of ICT Governance in Federal Public Administration (FPA) in Brazil is growing slowly. The number of organizations that effectively adopt good governance practices is low when compared to all other FPAs. This article presents results of a survey conducted at Public Organizations that have improved capability (iGovTI) stages according to the ACU. The iGovTI is the index of governance in which the organization is inserted, it can be (initial, basic, intermediate and enhanced). Knowing this, this survey collected used practices and identifies the profiles of organizations and their interviewees. As main results, we recognize that the Good Practices used in Enhanced Organizations are the same known in academia as well as in industry (for instance, COBIT, ITIL, CMMI, MPS.Br, PMBOK). Another relevant result is the evidence that even Enhanced Organizations do not adopt practices in topics considered relevant, including project management, information security and risk management.

Keywords

ICT governance Public Enhanced Organization Good practices Survey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgement to the development agencies: CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel), for granting a scholarship to and to INES (National Institute for Software Engineering), as well as the institutional collaboration of the various FPA Organizations.

References

  1. 1.
    F.S. Affeldt, A.A. Vanti, Information Technology strategic alignment: analysis of alignment models and proposals for future research. J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag. 6(2), 203–226 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I.D.S. Batista et al., Information Technology Governance Today the Importance of Adopting Best Practice Models in Organizations, in II World Congress on Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vigo, Spain, 2015. pp. 109–113Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Arshad, A.R. Ahlan, B.A. Ajayi, Intelligent IT governance decision-making support framework for a developing country’s public university. Int. Dec. Tech. 8(2), 131–146 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Lampathaki et al., Paving the way for future research in ICT for governance and policy modelling, in Electronic Government. EGOV 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6846, ed. By M. Janssen, H.J. Scholl, M.A. Wimmer, Y. Tan (Springer, Berlin,2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jansen A, The Understanding of ICTs in Public Sector and Its Impact on Governance, in Electronic Government. EGOV 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7443, ed. By H.J. Scholl, M. Janssen, M.A. Wimmer, C.E. Moe, L.S. Flak (Springer, Berlin, 2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Jairak, P. Praneetpolgrang, Applying IT governance balanced scorecard and importance-performance analysis for providing IT governance strategy in university. Inf. Manag. Comput. Security 21(4), 228–249 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.C. Borges, J.B. Simao, R.S. Miani, Exploratory Analysis of ICT Best Practices for Brazilian Federal Universities, in 2016 35th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC), ValParaíso, 2016, pp. 1–12Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tribunal de Contas da União—TCU, Referencial Básico de Governança, 2014b, p. 80Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tribunal de Contas da União—TCU, Acórdão 882/2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.H.C. Ramos, Multidimensional analysis of critical success factors for IT Governance within the Brazilian Federal Public Administration, in The Light of External Auditing Data. 12th International CONTECSI, 2015Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E.M. Luciano, G.C. Wiedenhoft, Identification of mechanisms to meet objectives and principles of Governance of Information Technology in Public Organizations, in V International Symposium on Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability, vol. 14, issue no. 1, 2016. pp. 69–87Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Al Qassimi, L. Rusu, IT Governance in a public organization in a developing country: a case study of a governmental organization. Procedia Comp. Sci. 64, 450–456 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Subsermsri, K. Jairak, P. Praneetpolgrang, Information technology governance practices based on sufficiency economy philosophy in the Thai University sector. Inform. Technol. People 28(1), 195–223 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V.R. Basili, D.M. Weiss, A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 10, 728–738 (1984). (Capítulo 14)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.Van Solingen et al., Goal question metric (GQM) approach, in Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, (Sage, Publications, Inc. 1995) 200 pagesGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    F.J. Fowler Junior, Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation, Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol 38 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F.M. Wolf, Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.L. Lunardi et al., The impact of adopting IT governance on financial performance: An empirical analysis among Brazilian firms. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 66–81 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.B.D. Da Silva et al., Public ICT governance: a quasi-systematic review. ICEIS 2, 351–359 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marianne Batista Diniz da Silva
    • 1
  • Alef Menezes dos Santos
    • 1
  • Michel dos Santos Soares
    • 1
  • Rogério Patrício Chagas do Nascimento
    • 1
  • Isabel Dillmann Nunes
    • 2
  1. 1.Postgraduate Program in Computer Science (PROCC), Federal University of Sergipe (UFS)São CristóvãoBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Metrópole Digital (IMD), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)NatalBrazil

Personalised recommendations