Abstract
For most of the history of the psychology of talent development, gender was simply construed as a binary construct based on the biological aspects of sex characteristics. Although gradually psychologists began to distinguish between biological sex and gender role, the socially constructed ideas of behaviors appropriate to male and female sex, it is only more recently that gender has been considered as a nonbinary complex. Therefore, this chapter presents gender on a continuum and will provide an overview of gender development in gifted students. Furthermore, the chapter detail issues specific to self-identified girls, self-identified boys, and LGBTQ gifted students. It should be noted that in the gifted education literature, biological sex is used almost exclusively; therefore within the context of this chapter we attempt to clarify that biological sex is not all encompassing. Suggestions for psychologists working with gifted students are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bloom, B. S., & Sosniak, L. A. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballentine Books.
Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (2005). Talent search research: What have we learned? High Ability Studies, 16(1), 97–111.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. The templeton national report on acceleration (Vol. 2). Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
Cornwell, C., Mustard, D. B., & Van Parys, J. (2013). Noncognitive skills and the gender disparities in test scores and teacher assessments: Evidence from primary school. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 236–264.
Cross, T. L. (1997). Psychological and social aspects of educating gifted students. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 180–200.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Dai, D. Y. (2002). Are gifted girls motivationally disadvantaged? Review, reflection, and redirection. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(4), 315–358.
Eagly, A. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Fredericks, T. P. (2009). Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered gifted. In B. Kerr (Ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent (Vol. 1, pp. 367–369). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..
Frey, N. (2005). Retention, social promotion, and academic redshirting what do we know and need to know? Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 332–346.
Friedrichs, T. P. (2014). Appropriately serving an emerging group: Educational practices and legal implications for gifted GLBT students. Excellence and Diversity in Gifted Education, 1. (1). Retrieved from http://cectag.com/resources/excellence-and-diversity-in-gifted-education-edge/inaugural-issue/.
Gagné, F. Y., & Gagnier, N. (2004). The socio-affective and academic impact of early entrance to school. Roeper Review, 26, 128–138.
Galinsky, E., Aumann, K., & Bond, J. T. (2013). Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and at home in the USA. In S. Poelmans, J. H. Greenhaus, & M. L. H. Maestro (Eds.), Expanding the boundaries of work-family research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Galupo, M. P., Davis, K. S., Grynkiewicz, A. L., & Mitchell, R. C. (2014). Conceptualization of sexual orientation identity among sexual minorities: Patterns across sexual and gender identity. Journal of Bisexuality, 14(3-4), 433–456.
Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. (2015). 2015 national school climate survey executive summary: Key findings on the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. Retrieved from http://glsen.org/nscs.
Hans, J. D., Kersey, M., & Kimberly, C. (2012). Self-perceived origins of attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(1), 4–17.
Hartley, B. L., & Sutton, R. M. (2013). A stereotype threat account of boys’ academic underachievement. Child Development, 84(5), 1716–1733. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.1207.
Hébert, T. P. (1995). Using biography to counsel gifted young men. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6, 208–219.
Hébert, T. P. (1996). Portraits of resilience: The urban life experiences of gifted Latino young men. Roeper Review, 19, 142–147.
Hébert, T. P. (1998). Gifted black males in an urban high school: Factors that influence achievement and underachievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 385–414.
Hébert, T. P. (2001). “If I had a new notebook, I know things would change”: Bright underachieving young men in urban classrooms. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 174–194.
Hertberg-Davis, H., & Callahan, C. M. (2008). A narrow escape: Gifted students’ perceptions of advanced placement and international baccalaureate programs. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 199–216.
Hutcheson, V., & Tieso, C. (2014). Social coping of gifted and LGBTQ adolescents. Journal for the Education of Gifted Students, 37(4), 355–377.
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 53–69.
Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(22), 8801–8807.
Jacobs, J. E., & Bleeker, M. M. (2004). Girls’ and boys’ developing interests in math and science: Do parents matter? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004(106), 5–21.
Johnson, N. G., Roberts, M. C., & Worrell, J. E. (1999). Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Synopsis. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from http://www.apa.org/pi/families/resources/adolescent-girls.aspx.
Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2010). Gender identity disorder outside the binary: When gender identity disorder-not otherwise specified is not good enough. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 597–598.
Kaufmann, F. A., & Matthews, D. J. (2012). On becoming themselves: The 1964–1968 presidential scholars 40 years later. Roeper Review, 34(2), 83–93.
Kell, H. J., & Lubinski, D. (2013). Spatial ability: A neglected talent in educational and occupational settings. Roeper Review, 35(4), 219–230.
Kerr, B., & McKay, R. (2013). Searching for tomorrow’s innovators: Profiling creative adolescents. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 21–32.
Kerr, B. A. (1997). Smart girls, gifted women. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Kerr, B. A., & Cohn, S. J. (2001). Smart boys. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Kerr, B. A., & McKay, R. (2014). Smart girls in the 21st century. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Kerr, B. A., & Multon, K. D. (2015). The development of gender identity, gender role, and gender relations in gifted students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 93(2), 183–191.
Kerr, B. A., Multon, K. D., Syme, M. L., Fry, N. M., Owens, R., Hammond, M., et al. (2012). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428198.
Kerr, B. A., & Robinson-Kurpius, S. E. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Studies, 15(1), 85–102.
Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265.
Levy, J. J., & Plucker, J. A. (2003). Assessing the psychological presentation of gifted and talented clients: A multicultural perspective. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 16, 229–247.
Lovas, G. S. (2011). Gender and patterns of language development in mother-toddler and father-toddler dyads. First Language, 31(1), 83–108.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345.
Matthews, M. S., & McBee, M. T. (2007). School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 167–181.
Mendez, L. M. R. (2000). Gender roles and achievement-related choices: A comparison of early adolescent girls in gifted and general education programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24(2), 149–169.
National Center for Transgender Equality. (2014). Transgender terminology. Retrieved from http://www.transequality.org/issues/resources/transgender-terminology.
Orenstein, P. (2011). Cinderella ate my daughter: Dispatches from the front lines of the new girlie-girl culture. Scranton, PA: Harper Collins Publishers.
Perrone, K. M., Perrone, P. A., Ksiazak, T. M., Wright, S. L., & Jackson, Z. V. (2007). Self-perception of gifts and talents among adults in a longitudinal study of academically talented high-school graduates. Roeper Review, 29(4), 259–264.
Peterson, J. S., & Rischar, L. (2000). Gifted and gay: A study of adolescent experience. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 231–246.
Ramsay, S. G., & Richards, H. C. (1997). Cooperative learning environments: Effects on academic attitudes of gifted students. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(4), 160–168.
Richardson, T. M., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 464–470.
Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender and Society, 23(2), 145–160.
Rotigel, J. V., & Fello, S. (2004). Mathematically gifted students: How can we meet their needs? Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 46–51.
Savin-Williams, R. C. (1998). The disclosure to families of same-sex attractions by lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 49–69.
Schilt, K., & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender normals,” transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender and Society, 23, 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209340034.
Shepard, S. J., Nicpon, M. F., Haley, J. T., Lind, M., & Liu, W. M. (2011). Masculine norms, school attitudes, and psychosocial adjustment among gifted boys. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12(2), 181–187.
Shriver, M. (2009). The Shriver report: A woman’s nation changes everything. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Solow, R., & Rhodes, C. (2012). College at 13: Young, gifted, & purposeful. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Stainthorp, R., & Hughes, D. (2004). What happens to precocious readers’ performance by the age of eleven? Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4), 357–372.
Steensma, T. D., Kreukels, B. P., de Vries, A. L., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2013). Gender identity development in adolescence. Hormones and Behavior, 64(2), 288–297.
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54.
Terman, L. M. (Ed.). (1981). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. 1). Paolo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1935). The promise of youth. Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 3). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2016). Changes in American adults’ reported same-sex sexual experiences and attitudes, 1897–2014. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(7), 1713–1730.
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402.
Wang, W., Parker, K., & Taylor, P. (2013). Breadwinner moms: Mothers are the sole or primary provider in four-in-ten households with children. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Webb, J. T. (2009). Misdiagnosis and dual diagnoses of gifted children and adults: ADHD, bipolar, OCD, Asperger’s, depression, and other disorders. Tuscon, AZ: Great Potential Press, Inc..
Wells, R. S., Seifert, T. A., Padgett, R. D., Park, S., & Umbach, P. D. (2011). Why do more women than men want to earn a four-year degree?: Exploring the effects of gender, social origin, and social capital on educational expectations. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 1–32.
Wilkinson, L., & Pearson, J. (2009). School culture and the well-being of same-sex-attracted youth. Gender and Society, 23, 542–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209339913.
Wright, E., & Perry, B. (2006). Sexual identity distress, social support, and the health of gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 81–110.
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes (Vol. 26, p. 3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kerr, B.A., Huffman, J.M. (2018). Gender and Talent Development of Gifted Students. In: Pfeiffer, S. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77003-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77004-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)