Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Giftedness in Children

Abstract

Creativity has been identified by many as an important indicator of giftedness. In this chapter, we provide an introduction to the field of creativity. The chapter begins with a definition of creativity, followed by classic theories that reflect the history of creativity research. We then review and critique creativity assessments, an area of the field that has seen much recent activity. This critique is structured around the traditional framework of the 4P model, namely, person, product, process, and press (or context). The next section discusses pedagogical techniques and implications for fostering creativity. Finally, reflections are made to offer perspectives on future directions, with a few thoughts on globalization, collaboration, replication, and equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2016). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: What do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured? Roeper Review, 39, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1247398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfonso-Benlliure, V., Meléndez, J. C., & García-Ballesteros, M. (2013). Evaluation of a creativity intervention program for preschoolers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, L. (2014). Visual-spatial ability: Important in STEM, ignored in gifted education. Roeper Review, 36, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.884198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R. (2009). Emotional creativity: Toward “spiritualizing the passions.”. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 249–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0023

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1996.tb00767.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (2012). Gender differences in creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 3, pp. 215–250). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Talent development in an age of situated approaches to learning and thinking. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3703_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basadur, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basadur, M. S., & Finkbeiner, C. T. (1985). Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem-solving training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638502100104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Expect the unexpected: Teaching for creativity in the micromoment. In M. B. Gregerson, H. T. Snyder, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Teaching creatively and teaching creativity (pp. 133–148). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5185-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2016). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: “All roads lead to creativity” or “You can’t get there from here”? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: Effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033644

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. (1990). On intelligence—More or less: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1203_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. H., Chen, H. C., Hsu, C. C., Chan, Y. C., & Chang, Y. L. (2015). Flexible humor styles and the creative mind: Using a typological approach to investigate the relationship between humor styles and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Hallowell, K., Huesman, R., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa Inventiveness Inventory: Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419209534429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costantino, T. (2015). Lessons from art and design education: The role of in-process critique in the creative inquiry process. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramond, B. (1994). We can trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 52(2), 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, T. (2006). Creativity, uncertainty and discomfort: Teachers as writers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640600866023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, R. (2007). Language play in the classroom: Encouraging children’s intuitive creativity with words through poetry. Literacy, 41, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00463.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curşeu, P. L., & Brink, T. T. (2016). Minority dissent as teamwork related mental model: Implications for willingness to dissent and group creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacey, J. S. (1989). Fundamentals of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, T., Epstein, M. J., & Shelton, R. (2006). Making innovation work: How to manage it, measure it, and profit from it. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A. (1992). Creativity is forever (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, V. L. (1997). In search of the Wild Bohemian: Challenges in the identification of the creatively gifted. Roeper Review, 19, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., Baas, M., Wolsink, I., & Roskes, M. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation, and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211435795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dilley, A., Fishlock, J., & Plucker, J. A. (2015). What we know about communication, P21 Research Series. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/4cs-research-series/communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, S. J., & Shafran, M. (2005). Note on consensual assessment technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 592–598. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.100.3.592-598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, S. Z., & Verreault, R. (1989). The creative thinking and ego functioning of children. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2017). High-tech innovation creativity and regional development. In J. A. Plucker (Ed.), Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 61–74). Waco, TX: Prufrock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisina, P. G., Borod, J. C., & Lepore, S. J. (2004). A meta-analysis of the effects of written emotional disclosure on the health outcomes of clinical populations. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 192, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000138317.30764.63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, M., & Collings, J. A. (1991). British teachers’ views of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1991.tb01356.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs-Beauchamp, K. D., Karnes, M. B., & Johnson, L. J. (1993). Creativity and intelligence in preschoolers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garaigordobil, M. (2006). Intervention in creativity with children aged 10 and 11 years: Impact of a play program on verbal and graphic–figural creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. H. (2003). Nurturing creativity in Chicano populations: Integrating history, culture, family, and self. Inquiry, 22(3), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20032238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (2008). Creativity in organizations. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), The Academy of Management Annals (Vol. 1, pp. 439–477). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. London, UK: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, E. (2009). Rephrasing the madness and creativity debate: What is the nature of the creativity construct? Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff, J., Howells, C., & Cranmer, S. (2012). Console game-based pedagogy. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 2, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2012040103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohman, M. G., & Szmidt, K. J. (2013). Teaching for creativity: How to shape creative attitudes in teachers and in students. In M. B. Gregerson, H. T. Snyder, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Teaching creatively and teaching creativity (pp. 15–35). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5185-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Robert R Knapp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J., & Woulfin, S. (2016). 21st century creativity: An investigation of how the P21 instructional frameworks reflect the principles of creativity. Roeper Review, 8, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1183741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39, 324–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, K. M. (2005). Creativity and the brain. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. (1991). An ecological approach to creativity and motivation: Trait and environmental influences in the college classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53–75). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1959). Some limitations of teacher ratings as predictors of creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., Hartzell, S. A., & Greene, M. T. (2009). Fostering creativity in the classroom: Effects of teachers’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, and goal orientation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01314.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). The group as mentor: Social capital and the systems model of creativity. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 225–244). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ivcevic, Z., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The can and cannot do attitude: How self-estimates of ability vary across ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning: Learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802059929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science, 24, 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kyaga, S., Lichtenstein, P., Boman, M., Hultman, C., Langstrom, N., & Landen, M. (2011). Creativity and mental disorder: Family study of 300 000 people with severe mental disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le, D. H., Cropley, D. H., & Gleaves, D. H. (2015). Examining the relationship between mental health, creative thought, and optimism. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 25, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.-R., Lin, C.-J., Tien, Y.-H., & Chen, C.-M. (2015). A multilevel model of team cultural diversity and creativity: The role of climate for inclusion. Journal of Creative Behavior., 51, 163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01225.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. C. (2014). The empirical march: Making science better at self-correction. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. C., Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Putallaz, M., & Benbow, C. P. (2016). When lightning strikes twice: Profoundly gifted, profoundly accomplished. Psychological Science, 27, 1004–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616644735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Creativity is more than novelty: Reconsidering replication as a creativity act. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (Eds.). (2017). Toward a more perfect psychology: Improving trust, accuracy, and transparency in research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., Jo, S., & Muammar, O. M. (2008). Development of creativity: The influence of varying levels of implementation of the DISCOVER curriculum model, a non-traditional pedagogical approach. Learning & Individual Differences, 18, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 27, 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496272003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 876–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, W. (2015). Promoting creativity in the classroom: A generative view. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 122. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, W., Esping, A., & Plucker, J. A. (2017). Confucian conceptions of human intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 21, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2013). Recent transformations in China’s economic and education policies for promoting innovation and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2015). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology, 49, 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 110–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0006

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., & Beghetto, R. (2003). Why not be creative when we enhance creativity? In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 215–226). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal study data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Who’s creative? (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Dow, G. T. (2017). Attitude change as the precursor to creativity enhancement. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd ed., pp. 190–211). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Holden, J., & Neustadter, D. (2008). The criterion problem and creativity in film: Psychometric characteristics of various measures. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2015). What we know about creativity, P21 Research Series. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/4cs-research-series/creativity

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., Temple, J. S., & Qian, M. (2009). Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way? Psychology & Marketing, 26, 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Kennedy, C., & Dilley, A. (2015). What we know about collaboration, P21 Research Series. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/4cs-research-series/collaboration

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48–73). New York, NY: Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Peters, S. J. (2016). Excellence gaps in education: Expanding opportunities for talented youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Schmalensee, S. L. (2014). Is what you see what you really get? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of real-world divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.901023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01081.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Runco, M. A., & Hegarty, B. (2011). Enhancement of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 456–460). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Runco, M. A., & Lim, W. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyryt, M. C. (1999). Effectiveness of training children’s divergent thinking: A meta-analytic review. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods (pp. 351–365). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, K. F., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410391442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers’ judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1989). Parents’ and teachers’ ratings of the creativity of children. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2005). Creative giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 295–311). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (rev. ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448504500306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00423.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40–76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1334_16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S. W. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14282-000

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S. W., & Wallace, C. E. (2013). Pretend play and creative processes. American Journal of Play, 6, 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., & Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., & Kimbrel, N. A. (2010). A dimensional analysis of creativity and mental illness: Do anxiety and depression symptoms predict creative cognition, creative accomplishments, and creative self-concepts? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1976). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(2), 218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (pp. 116–136). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2014). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. (2009). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 690–709. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125–147). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1996). IQ counts, but what really counts is successful intelligence. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659608058305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01223.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strough, J., & Diriwaechter, R. (2000). Dyad gender differences in preadolescents’ creative stories. Sex Roles, 43, 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1967). Understanding the fourth grade slump in creative thinking (No. BR-5-0508; CRP-994). Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1971). Are the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking biased against or in favor of the “disadvantaged” groups? Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1973). Non-test indicators of creative talent among disadvantaged children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 17, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Ginn and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking—Norms—Technical manual—Figural (streamlined) forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., & Gupta, R. K. (1964). Programmed experiences in creative thinking. Final report on Title VII Project to the U.S. Office of Education. Minneapolis, MN: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, D. C. K., Fung, H. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2016). Teamwork and flow proneness mitigate the negative effect of excess challenge on flow state. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A. (1976, January–February). Tests tell us little about talent. American Scientist, 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. L. (1999). Operational definitions and assessment of higher-order cognitive constructs. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, S. L. C. Y. (2015). Performative authoring: Nurturing children’s creativity and creative self-efficacy through digitally-augmented enactment-based storytelling (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, X., Plucker, J. A., & Guo, J. (2015). Modeling influences on divergent thinking and artistic creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Talented Youth and School of Education, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Jonathan A. Plucker & Jiajun Guo

  2. Talent Identification Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Matthew C. Makel

Authors
  1. Jonathan A. Plucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiajun Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew C. Makel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan A. Plucker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA

    Steven I. Pfeiffer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Plucker, J.A., Guo, J., Makel, M.C. (2018). Creativity. In: Pfeiffer, S. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation