Advertisement

Effect of Microstructure on the Low-Cycle Fatigue Properties of a Fe–15Mn–10Cr–8Ni–4Si Austenitic Alloy

  • Ilya Nikulin
  • Takahiro Sawaguchi
  • Yuuji Kimura
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of the initial austenitic structure on the low-cycle fatigue (LCF) properties and ε-martensitic transformation (ε-MT) was studied in the Fe–15Mn–10Cr–8Ni–4Si seismic damping alloy under an axial strain control mode with total strain amplitude, Δεt/2, of 0.01. The microstructures with various grain size and texture conditions were produced by warm rolling followed by annealing at temperatures that ranged from 600 to 900 °C. It was found that the increase in the austenitic grain size observed in the studied temperature interval generally does not affect martensitic transformation and the LCF resistance of the studied alloy. However, strong texture and substructure remaining in the alloy after low temperature annealing at T ≤ 700 °C inhibit strain-induced phase transformation and reduce fatigue resistance of the studied alloy. As a result, the alloy annealed at T ≥ 800 °C shows higher fatigue resistance than that one annealed at T ≤ 700 °C.

Keywords

High-Mn steels Low-cycle fatigue Microstructure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Materials Manufacturing and Engineering Station, NIMS, for materials processing.

References

  1. 1.
    Sawaguchi T, Maruyama T, Otsuka H, Kushibe A, Inoue Y, Tsuzaki K (2016) Design concept and applications of Fe–Mn–Si-based alloys—from shape-memory to seismic response control. Mater Trans 57:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nikulin I, Sawaguchi T, Kushibe A, Inoue Y, Otsuka H, Tsuzaki K (2016) Effect of strain amplitude on the low-cycle fatigue behavior of a new Fe–15Mn–10Cr–8Ni–4Si seismic damping alloy. Int J Fatigue 88:132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang BH, Sun L, Li R, Hsu TY (1995) Influence of austenite grain size on γ-ε martensitic transformation temperature in Fe–Mn–Si–Cr alloys. Scr Met Mat 33:63–68Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hilkhuijsen P, Geijselaers HJM, Bor TC, Perdahcioglu ES, Boogaard AH, Akkerman R (2013) Strain direction dependency of martensitic transformation in austenitic stainless steels: the effect of g-texture. Mater Sci Eng, A 573:100–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gu Q, Van Humbeeck J, Delaey L (1994) A review on the martensitic transformation and shape memory effect in Fe–Mn–Si alloys. J Phys IV France 04:C3-135–C3-144Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2005) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright SI, Nowell MM, Field DP (2011) A review of strain analysis using electron backscatter diffraction. Microsc Microanal 17:316–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mannan P, Saleh AA, Gazder AA, Casillas G, Pereloma EV (2016) Microstructure and micro-texture evolution during the dynamic recrystallisation of a Ni–30Fe–Nb–C model alloy. J Alloys Compd 689:250–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nikulin I, Sawaguchi T, Ogawa K, Tsuzaki K (2016) Effect of γ to ε martensitic transformation on low-cycle fatigue behaviour and fatigue microstructure of Fe–15Mn–10Cr–8Ni–xSi austenitic alloys. Acta Mater 105:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nikulin I, Sawaguchi T, Tsuzaki K (2013) Effect of alloying composition on low-cycle fatigue properties and microstructure of Fe–30Mn–(6-x)Si–xAl TRIP/TWIP alloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 587:192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skelton RP (1987) High temperature fatigue: properties and prediction. Elsevier, London/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilya Nikulin
    • 1
  • Takahiro Sawaguchi
    • 1
  • Yuuji Kimura
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Materials ScienceTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations