Skip to main content

Multi-channel Electro-tactile Feedback System for a Prosthetic Hand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice 3

Abstract

Amputees with prosthetic hands often have difficulty holding and manipulating objects due to the absence of the sense of touch. This is especially true with tasks that require some degree of skill and tactile feedback to perform. To provide prosthetic hands with touch sensing and tactile feedback, researchers have been experimenting with various types of force and/or tactile sensors together with various methods for delivering the tactile information to the brain. Although some success has been achieved recently with force sensors and implanted electrodes, these systems are expensive, surgically invasive and can represent an infection risk where cables are attached to nerves through the skin. Also, non-invasive tactile feedback methods involving temperature, vibrations or electro-mechanical force feedbacks, can be somewhat awkward and ineffective due to being cumbersome or unable to deliver appropriate sensations. To address some of these issues we have developed an electro-tactile feedback system for prosthetic hands. Our system is comprised of force sensors that can be placed almost anywhere on a prosthetic hand, and TENS electrodes that can be placed on the wearer’s arm. Our system is inexpensive, multi-channel and easily fitted to existing prosthetic hands. Experimental results are provided that show how this form of tactile feedback can enable a user to feel various objects touched or gripped with a robotic humanoid hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MacKenzie, C., and T. Iberall. 2010. The grasping hand. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johansson, R.S., and J.R. Flanagan. 2009. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10: 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klatzky, R.L., and S.J. Lederman. 1995. Identifying objects from a haptic glance. Percept Psycophys 57: 1111–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biddiss, E., D. Beaton, and T. Chau. 2007. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disability Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2: 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jiminez, M.C., and J.A. Fishel. 2014. Evaluation of force, vibration and thermal tactile feedback in prosthetic limbs. In IEEE international conference on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems (Haptics), 437–441.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fishel, J.A., and G.E. Loeb. (2012). Sensing tactile microvibrations with the BioTac—Comparison with human sensitivity. In Proceedings IEEE/RAS-EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, 1122–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tan, D.W., M.A. Schiefer, M.W. Keith, J.R. Anderson, J. Tyler, and D.J. Tyler. 2014. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Science Translational Medicine 6 (257): 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raspopovic, S., et al. 2014. Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Science Translational Medicine 6, no. 222: 222ra19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pylatiuk, C., and A. Kargov, Schulz, S. 2006. Design and evaluation of a low-cost force feedback system for myoelectric prosthetic hands. JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 18, no. 2: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Antfolk, C., et al. 2012. Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 44 (8): 702–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, K., and J.E. Colgate, Peshkin, M.A. (2007). A pilot study of a thermal display using a miniature tactor for upper extremity prosthesis. In Proceedings frontiers in the convergence of bioscience and information technologies, 531–536.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, K., et al. 2010. On the design of miniature haptic devices for upper extremity prosthetics. IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics 15 (1): 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saunders, I., and S. Vijayakumar. 2011. The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 8: 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. D’Alonzo, C. Cipriani, Carozza M.C. (2011). Vibrotactile sensory substitution in multifingered hand prostheses: Evaluation studies. In Proceeding ieee international conference on rehabilitation robotics rehab week, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, K., and J.E. Colgate. (2012). Haptic feedback enhances grip force control of sEMG-controlled prosthetic hands in targeted reinnervation amputees. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 20 (6): 798–805.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Antfolk, C., et al. 2013. Transfer of tactile input from an artificial hand to the forearm: experiments in amputees and able-bodied volunteers. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 8 (3): 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ajoudani, A. et.al. (2014). Exploring Teleimpedance and Tactile Feedback for Intuitive Control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand. IEEE Transaction On Haptics 7 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaczmarek, K.A., J.G. Webster, P. Bach-y-Rita, and W.J. Tompkins. 1991. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 38 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meers, S., and K. Ward. 2004. A vision system for providing 3D perception of the environment via transcutaneous electro-neural stimulation. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE international conference on information visualisation, London, 546–552.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, G., Asakura, Y., and R. Okuno, Akazawa, K. 2005. Tactile substitution system for transmitting a few words to a prosthetic hand user. In Proceeding of the 2005 IEEE engineering in medicine and biology 27th annual conference, 6908–6911, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Perović, M., M. Stevanovic, T. Jevtic, M. Strbac, G. Bijelic, and C. Vucetic. 2013. Electrical stimulation of the forearm: a method for transmitting sensory signals from the artificial hand to the brain. Journal of Automatic Control, University of Belgrade 21: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koren Ward .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ward, K., Pamungkas, D. (2018). Multi-channel Electro-tactile Feedback System for a Prosthetic Hand. In: Billingsley, J., Brett, P. (eds) Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76947-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76947-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76946-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76947-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics