Advertisement

T-Shaped Mining: A Novel Approach to Talent Finding for Agile Software Teams

  • Sajad Sotudeh GharebaghEmail author
  • Peyman Rostami
  • Mahmood Neshati
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10772)

Abstract

Human resources management is one of the most overriding parts of organizations. They are always willing to hire individuals who meet their requirements while do not impose high costs on the organization. Hence, most organizations, in particular, those which are engaged in Computer Engineering industry are inclined to find and employ individuals who are characterized by their deep disciplinary knowledge in one single area, and their ability to collaborate across different aspects of projects due to their general knowledge in other areas. Nowadays, Community Question Answering i.e. CQA websites are among the best places to find experts. In this study, we propose two models to find and then rank experts with specialty in a specific skill area, as well as general knowledge in the other skill areas i.e. T-shaped users. We estimate the profile diversity of users in our models to detect those who have the aforementioned feature in CQAs, particularly Stackoverflow. Our experiments on three real test collections generated from Stackoverflow’s published data indicate the efficiency of the proposed models in comparison with the state-of-the-art expertise retrieval approach.

References

  1. 1.
    Dargahi Nobari, A., Sotudeh Gharebagh, S., Neshati, M.: Skill translation models in expert finding. In: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2017, pp. 1057–1060. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neshati, M., Fallahnejad, Z., Beigy, H.: On dynamicity of expert finding in community question answering. Inf. Process. Manage. 53(5), 1026–1042 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Dijk, D., Tsagkias, M., de Rijke, M.: Early detection of topical expertise in community question answering. In: SIGIR 2015, pp. 995–998. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neshati, M.: On early detection of high voted Q&A on stack overflow. Inf. Process. Manage. 53(4), 780–798 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fang, Y., de Rijke, M., Xie, H.: DDTA 2016: the workshop on data-driven talent acquisition. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2016, pp. 2507–2508. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ambler, S.W., Lines, M.: Disciplined Agile Delivery: A Practitioner’s Guide to Agile Software Delivery in the Enterprise, 1st edn. IBM Press, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar, V., Pedanekar, N.: Mining shapes of expertise in online social Q&A communities. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion, CSCW 2016 Companion, pp. 317–320. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bazelli, B., Hindle, A., Stroulia, E.: On the personality traits of StackOverflow users. In: 2013 29th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp. 460–463. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balog, K., Fang, Y., de Rijke, M., Serdyukov, P., Si, L.: Expertise retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval 6(2–3), 127–256 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Gysel, C., de Rijke, M., Worring, M.: Unsupervised, efficient and semantic expertise retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2016, pp. 1069–1079. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liang, S., de Rijke, M.: Formal language models for finding groups of experts. Inf. Process. Manage. 52(4), 529–549 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guest, D.: The hunt is on for the renaissance man of computing, 17 September 1991Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chapelle, O., Metlzer, D., Zhang, Y., Grinspan, P.: Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2009, pp. 621–630. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sajad Sotudeh Gharebagh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peyman Rostami
    • 1
  • Mahmood Neshati
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and EngineeringShahid Beheshti University, G.C.TehranIran

Personalised recommendations