Skip to main content

Methodology and Criteria for the Allocation of Reused Water in Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multicriteria Analysis in Agriculture

Part of the book series: Multiple Criteria Decision Making ((MCDM))

Abstract

This chapter provides a methodology to analyse the allocation of reused water. The tool has been developed for the Guadalquivir River Basin Authority, allowing decision makers to rank the actions on the reutilization of urban water for agriculture. The decision support is based on four groups of attributes: (1) resource supply, (2) environmental impact, (3) technical and economic feasibility and (4) social and institutional impact. A multicriteria decision method is proposed to aggregate all selected indicators. The results allow the River Basin Authority to classify different water requests of reused water, according not only to their technical knowledge, but also to the experience of different experts and stakeholders in water management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguarón, J., & Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2000). Stability intervals in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 125(114), 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado, A., Esteller, M. V., Quentin, E., & Expósito, J. L. (2016). Multi-criteria decision analysis and GIS approach for prioritization of drinking water utilities protection based on their vulnerability to contamination. Water Resources Management, 30(4), 1549–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbel, J., Kolberg, S., & Martin-Ortega, J. (2012). Assessment of the draft hydrological basin plan of the Guadalquivir river basin (Spain). International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbel, J., Pedraza, V., & Giannoccaro, G. (2013). The trajectory towards basin closure of a European river: Guadalquivir. International Journal of River Basin Management, 11(1), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego-Marín, M. M., & Riesgo, L. (2016). Measuring the sustainability of water plans in inter-regional Spanish river basins. Water, 8(8), 342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozoki, S., & Rapcsak, T. (2008). Saaty’s and Koczkodaj’s inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of Global Optimization, 42(2), 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coordination and Support Action “CSA 4PRIMA”. (2017). Retrieved from http://4prima.org/sites/default/files/publication/PRIMA%20SRIA.pdf

  • Easley, R. W., Madden, C. S., & Dunn, M. G. (2000). Conducting marketing science: The role of replication in the research process. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 83:92.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015). Closing the loop - an EU action plan for the circular economy. COM/2015/0614 final. European Commission, communication from the commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency. (2016a). Guidelines on integrating water reuse into water planning and management in the context of the WFD. Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/guidelines-on-integrating-water-reuse

  • European Environment Agency. (2016b). Use of freshwater resources. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/use-of-freshwaterresources-2/assessment-1

  • Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 165:169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadalquivir Basin Management Plan. (2015–2021). Retrieved from http://www.chguadalquivir.es/opencms/portalchg/planHidrologicoDemarcacion/demarcacionGuadalquivir/segundoCicloPlanificacion/

  • Hadipour, A., Rajaee, T., Hadipour, V., & Seidirad, S. (2016). Multi-criteria decision-making model for wastewater reuse application: A case study from Iran. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(30), 13857–13864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz, S., & Collins, K. (2007). A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resources Management, 21(9), 1553–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalavrouziotis, I. K., Filintas, A. T., Koukoulakis, P. H., & Hatzopoulos, J. N. (2011). Application of multicriteria analysis in the management and planning of treated municipal wastewater and sludge reuse in agriculture and land development: The case of sparti’s wastewater treatment plant, Greece. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 20(2), 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment. (2016). BOE 2016 Royal Decree 1/2016, 439, 2972-4301. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2016/01/19/pdfs/BOE-A-2016-439.pdf

  • Ministry of Presidence. (2007). BOE 2007 Royal Decree 1620/2007, 294, 50639-50661. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/12/08/pdfs/A50639-50661.pdf

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. M. (2000). Methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanguanduan, N., & Nititvattananon, V. (2011). Strategic decision making for urban water reuse application: A case from Thailand. Desalination, 268(1–3), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L. K., & Egan, M. (2017). The public accountability value of a triple bottom line approach to performance reporting in the water sector. Australian Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12173.

  • United Nations. (2017). World water development report. Retrieved from http://www.unwater.org/publications/world-water-development-report-2017/

  • Whitmarsh, D., & Palmieri, M. G. (2009). Social acceptability of marine aquaculture: The use of survey based methods for eliciting public and stakeholder preferences. Marine Policy, 33, 452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research behind this study has been financed by Guadalquivir River Basin Authority under the Project “Definition of allocation criteria for the reserve of up to 20 hm3/year of reused water. CU(PH)-5489” and the authors have received financial support from MINECO-Grant AGL2014-53417-R. This paper does not represent any official position or endorsement of the funding organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María M. Borrego-Marín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borrego-Marín, M.M., Riesgo, L., Berbel, J. (2018). Methodology and Criteria for the Allocation of Reused Water in Agriculture. In: Berbel, J., Bournaris, T., Manos, B., Matsatsinis, N., Viaggi, D. (eds) Multicriteria Analysis in Agriculture. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76929-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics