Skip to main content

Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Linear and Non-linear Optimization of Aqueous Herbal Extracts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multicriteria Analysis in Agriculture

Part of the book series: Multiple Criteria Decision Making ((MCDM))

  • 740 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is aimed to present the multi-criteria decision analysis: Linear and non-linear optimization of aqueous herbal extracts. Modelling is an indispensable part of food production, from “farm to fork”, where it is used to optimize the initial production of food and feed as well as in the food and feed processing. Different particle sizes of olive leaves were used in extraction of biologically active components using water as a solvent. Experiment conditions varied in mixing times (5, 10, 15 min), heating treatments (40 °C, 60 °C, 80 °C), Revolutions per minute: rpm (250, 500, 750 min−1) and particle sizes (100, 300, 500 μm). Based on the measured bioactive compounds (pH, total dissolved solids, conductivity, dry matter, total polyphenols and the antioxidant capacity by ABTS method, DPPH method and FRAP method). Aim was to develop models to support the optimization of this decision-making process—find the best experiment conditions for extraction of a certain bioactive compound. Two approaches; linear and nonlinear approaches were investigated. Linear optimization is presented with two models: Response Surface Methodology and using linear programing based on the Simplex method while the nonlinear approach is presented by developing membership functions using fuzzy logic approach. Final results showed that, simple or complex, i.e. linear or nonlinear approach(es) in the search for optimal experiment conditions in extraction of bioactive compounds from olive leaves, will lead to an optimal solution, but the engineer will decide which approach is suitable for further application. Linear optimization and application of fuzzy logic resulted with the best possible offer per set limitations. But each approach resulted with other optimal extraction conditions. However, the application of fuzziness allowed the extension of the set of acceptable experiment combinations to achieve the best extraction of a bioactive component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agah, A. (2014). Medical applications of artificial intelligence. New York: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Cook, C. M., Borror, C. M., & Mongomery, D. C. (2009). Response surface design evaluation and comparison. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 39, 629–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC. (1995). Official methods of analysis of the association of official agricultural chemists. Washington, DC: Association of Analytical Chemists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzie, I. F., & Strain, J. J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 239, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995). Use of free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Food Science and Technology, 28, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen, B., Kjeldsen, C., Dalgaard, T., & Martin-Ortega, J. (2015). Can fuzzy cognitive mapping help in agricultural policy design and communication? Land Use Policy, 45, 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehe, B., & Bamford, D. (2015). Development, test and comparison of two multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) models: A case of healthcare infrastructure location. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(19), 6717–6727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrien, M., Badr, A., Gosselin, A., Desjardins, Y., & Angers, P. (2017). Optimization of a green process for the extraction of lutein and chlorophyll from spinach by-products using response surface methodology (RSM). Food Science and Technology, 79, 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajdoš Kljusurić, J., Rumora, I., & Kurtanjek, Ž. (2012). Application of fuzzy logic in diet therapy – Advantages of application. In E. P. Dadios (Ed.), Fuzzy logic – Emerging technologies and applications. Rijeka: InTech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajdoš Kljusurić, J., Orešković, P., Tušek, K., & Kurtanjek, Ž. (2014, June). Linear programming versus fuzzy logic optimization in nutrition: Case of gestational diabetes. OPT-i an international conference on engineering and applied sciences optimization, Kos, 03-07. paper 3631-CD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurinjak Tušek, A., Benković, M., Belščak Cvitanović, A., Valinger, D., Jurina, T., & Gajdoš Kljusurić, J. (2016). Kinetics and thermodynamics of the solid-liquid extraction process of total polyphenols, antioxidants and extraction yield from Asteraceae plants. Industrial Crops and Products, 91, 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik, R., Pradeeo, N., Vamshi, V., Geetha, M., & Usha, A. (2010). Nutrient composition of cultivated stevia leaves and the influence of polyphenols and plant pigments on sensory and antioxidant properties of leaf extracts. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47, 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, M. D., Sieck, C., Gascon, G., Malarkey, W., & Huerta, T. (2016). A healthcare utilization cost comparison between employees receiving a worksite mindfulness or a diet/exercise lifestyle intervention to matched controls 5 years post intervention. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 27, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kljusurić, G. J., Orešković, P., Tušek K., & Kurtanjek Ž. (2014, June). Linear programming versus fuzzy logic optimization in nutrition: Case of gestational diabetes. OPT-i an international conference on engineering and applied sciences optimization, Kos, 03-07. paper 3631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupka, J., & Rusnok, P. (2017). Regression analysis based on linguistic associations and perception-based logical deduction. Expert Systems with Applications, 67, 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesellier, E., Mith, D., & Dubrulle, I. (2015). Method developments approaches in supercritical fluid chromatography applied to the analysis of cosmetics. Journal of Chromatography A, 1423, 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., He, L., & Shen, J. (2017). Optimization-based provincial hybrid renewable and non-renewable energy planning – A case study of Shanxi, China. Energy, 128(1), 839–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogale, D. G., Kumar, S. K., García Márquez, F. P., & Tiwari, M. K. (2017). Bulk wheat transportation and storage problem of public distribution system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 104, 80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orešković, P., Gajdoš Kljusurić, J., & Šatalić, Z. (2015). Computer-generated vegan menus: The importance of FCDB choice. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 37, 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinelo, M., Rubilar, M., Sineiro, J., & Nunez, M. (2005). A thermal treatment to increase the antioxidant capacity of natural phenols: Catechin, resveratrol, and grape extract cases. European Food Research and Technology, 221(3–4), 284−290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Yang, M., & Rice-Evans, C. (1999). Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorisation assay. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 26, 1231–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc. (2008). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. www.statsoft.com

  • Stich, J., Ramachandran, S., Hamacher, T., & Stimming, U. (2017). Techno-economic estimation of the power generation potential from biomass residues in Southeast Asia. Energy, 135(15), 930–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Ma, X., Liu, M., Gong, K., Liu, Y., Xu, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Cooperation and profit allocation in two-echelon logistics joint distribution network optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 56, 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirsam, B., & Hahn, A. (1999). Fuzzy methods in nutrition planning and education and clinical nutrition. In Soft computing in human-related sciences. Florida: CRC Press. ISBN 0849316359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram Research Inc. (2017). Mathematica, version 11.2. IL: Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., Zhu, T., Gao, N., & Wu, Z. (2016). Optimization design of capacity and operation strategy for building level distributed energy system. Procedia Engineering, 146, 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Gajdoš Kljusurić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gajdoš Kljusurić, J., Jurinjak Tušek, A., Valinger, D., Benković, M., Jurina, T. (2018). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Linear and Non-linear Optimization of Aqueous Herbal Extracts. In: Berbel, J., Bournaris, T., Manos, B., Matsatsinis, N., Viaggi, D. (eds) Multicriteria Analysis in Agriculture. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76929-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics