Advertisement

Erasmus and Employability

  • David Cairns
  • Ewa Krzaklewska
  • Valentina Cuzzocrea
  • Airi-Alina Allaste
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we take an in-depth look at one of the main theoretical constructs underpinning the Erasmus programme: the idea of ‘employability’. Taking a sociologically informed view, we define ‘employability’ as a form of reflexivity to be practiced during the transition from tertiary education to the labour market. Understanding employability involves appreciating the need to link potential employees and employers, with educators and trainers providing a crucial meditative role in this relationship. Erasmus provides a pedagogical habitus within which this form of reflexivity is imaginatively conjoined with intra-European mobility. The idea is to make students capable of working across national boundaries, acquiring the capacity to engage in transnational circulation and establish professional relationships that traverse national fields, including the development of pragmatic skills, such as foreign language fluency, and an appreciation of cultural diversity.

References

  1. Archer, M. S. (2008). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brandenburg, U., Berghoff, S., & Taboadela, O. (2014). The Erasmus impact study. Effects of mobility on the skills and employability of students and the internationalisation of higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  6. Brandenburg, U., Petrova, D., Bugárová, M., Kunc, M., Stiburek, S., & Tůmová, P. (2016). The Erasmus impact study. Regional analysis. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  7. Cairns, D. (2014). Youth transitions, international student mobility and spatial reflexivity: Being mobile? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairns, D., Cuzzocrea, V., Briggs, D., & Veloso, L. (2017). The consequences of mobility: Reflexivity, social inequality and the reproduction of precariousness in highly qualified migration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cairns, D., Growiec, K., & Smyth, J. (2013). Leaving Northern Ireland: The youth mobility field, habitus and recession among undergraduates in Belfast. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(4), 544–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cedefop. (2008). Terminology of European education and training policy: A selection of 100 key terms. Luxembourg: Publications Office.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. A. (1998). Language learning and study abroad: The European perspective. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 4(2), 167–203.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2012). Youth in action programme guide. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2015). Erasmus+ international credit mobility: Frequently asked questions for higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2017). Erasmus+ programme guide (version 2). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  15. Feyen, B., & Krzaklewska, E. (Eds.). (2013). The Erasmus phenomenon—Symbol of a new European generation. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hu, A., & Cairns, D. (2017). Hai Gui or Hai Dai? Chinese student migrants and the role of Norwegian mobility capital in career success. Young, 25(2), 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krzaklewska, E. (2010). Tak wiele się nauczyłam/em—analiza doświadczenia wyjazdu na Erasmusa w świetle sytuacji młodych w Europie [I have learnt so much—Analysis of study abroad experience of Erasmus students in the light of youth situation in Europe]. In D. Pauluk (Ed.), Student we współczesnym uniwersytecie—ideały i codzienność [Students in the contemporary university—Ideals and reality]. Oficyna Wydawnicza IMPULS.Google Scholar
  19. Mattern, D. (2016). An appraisal of the importance of graduates’ language skills and ERASMUS experiences. Industry and Higher Education, 30(5), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parey, M., & Waldinger, F. (2011). Studying abroad and the effect of international labour market mobility: Evidence from the introduction of Erasmus. Economic Journal, 121(551), 194–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tomlinson, M. (2008). ‘The degree is not enough’: Students’ perceptions of the role of higher education credentials for graduate work and employability. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tymon, A. (2011). The student perspective on employability. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 841–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Cairns
    • 1
  • Ewa Krzaklewska
    • 2
  • Valentina Cuzzocrea
    • 3
  • Airi-Alina Allaste
    • 4
  1. 1.ISCTE-University Institute of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Jagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland
  3. 3.University of CagliariCagliariItaly
  4. 4.Tallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations