Skip to main content

Agricultural Transition in Selected Asian Economies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Transition in China

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Economic History ((PEHS))

  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 6 is a comparative study of the post-war technical and institutional agricultural transitions in China and selected Asian rice economies, especially Japan. After 1979, inter-sectoral competition for factors and resources between the agriculture and industrial sectors in China increased sharply. In the face of the same demands of technology diffusion, the experiences of China show significant differences in terms of technology selection, localisation and the duration of green revolution initiatives. Compared with China, Japan is another good example of technology deviation during green revolution. This chapter seeks to throw light on these issues by explaining the diversification in the same technology diffusion under different market structures and institutions between China and Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thanks to a sharp and continuous decline in the marginal product of labour, the involutionary process was characterised by high land output side by side with a low output-to-labour ratio.

  2. 2.

    This is also known as the Edo Bakufu (江戸幕府).

  3. 3.

    It is determined by the cost of: (a) collective action; (b) the level of incentive to generate innovation; and (c) the nature of the distribution of revenue between the innovator and other beneficiaries.

  4. 4.

    This has caused the price of agricultural labour to equalise with the industrial sector’s labour price, and thus no price difference between agriculture and industry labour markets. Consequently, the conditions leading to induced innovation type of institutional and technological change will no longer hold.

  5. 5.

    The 2010 grain output reached 500 million tonnes.

References

  • FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Database, 27 May 2013, http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html

  • Hayami, Yujiro. ‘Sources of Agricultural Productivity Gap Among Selected Countries.’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51 (1969): 564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Yujiro, and Masao Kikuchi. ‘Agricultural Growth Against a Land Resource Constraint: A Comparative History of Japan, Taiwan, Korea and the Philippines.’ The Journal of Economic History 33, no. 4 (1985): 839–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. ‘Technology, Market, and Community in Contract Choice: Rice Harvesting in the Philippines.’ Economic Development and Cultural Change 47, no. 2 (1999): 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Yujiro, and Vernon Ruttan. ‘Agricultural Productivity Differences Among Countries.’ American Economic Review 60 (1970a): 895–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. ‘Factor Prices and Technical Change in Agricultural Development: The United States and Japan, 1880–1960.’ Journal of Political Economy 78, no. 5 (1970b): 1115–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. ‘Induced Innovation Theory and Agricultural Development: A Personal Account.’ In Induced Innovation Theory and International Agricultural Development: A Reassessment, edited by Bruce Koppel. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, E., and B. Ohlin. Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Statistical Yearbook, edited by Statistical Research and Training Institute, MIC. Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan. Tokyo: Japan Statistical Association, 1960–2013 Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. Prices of Factors and Good in General Equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 21 (1953): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Rice Statistics. IRRI. International Rice Research Institute World Rice Statistics Online Query Facility Database, 15 May 2013, http://ricestat.irri.org:8080/wrs2/entrypoint.htm

  • Zhongguo Tongji Nianjian (China Statistical Yearbook). National Bureau of Statistics of China. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1981–2013 Editions.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Du, J. (2018). Agricultural Transition in Selected Asian Economies. In: Agricultural Transition in China. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76905-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76905-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76904-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76905-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics