Skip to main content

First Phase Clocks and Frequency Transfer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geometrical Theory of Satellite Orbits and Gravity Field

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 993 Accesses

Abstract

In Švehla and Rothacher (2004a, b, 2005a, 2006b), it was demonstrated for the first time that clock parameters for GPS satellites and ground stations can be estimated solely from the carrier-phase GPS measurements. These also allow frequency transfer with a very high level of accuracy of a few parts in 10- 16 (≈25 ps/day in terms of linear time rate). The main motivation for the development of the phase clock approach is to avoid the colored systematic noise that is introduced by using code, or smoothed code GPS measurements and other possible biases in the official GNSS clock parameters provided by IGS. On the other hand, phase clocks completely absorb the GPS radial orbit error and are fully consistent with the LEO carrier-phase measurements when determining kinematic or reduced-dynamic LEO orbits, since in both cases carrier-phase ambiguities are estimated. Phase measurements from a GPS ground network of about 40–50 stations tracking about 30 GPS satellites in MEO orbit form a closed, internally connected system, in which the phase information of one clock can be related to that of any other GPS satellite or a ground station clock in the network, even on the antipodal side of the world. This opens up the possibility of high-precision positioning and especially intercontinental non-common view frequency transfer of utmost accuracy. We may say, phase clocks are the optimal way to compare phase information between ground station clocks and/or LEO/GNSS satellites. Later on in this thesis, we introduce the concept of track-to-track ambiguities to optimally fix carrier-phase ambiguities to their integer values.

Later, phase clocks were also studied in Dach et al. (2005, 2006); Bauch et al. (2006) and in Matsakis et al. (2006) over longer periods of time and have been compared to other time/frequency comparison techniques. Ambiguity resolution with phase clocks was demonstrated for the first time in Švehla and Rothacher (2006a) and later on in Mercier and Laurichesse (2007), Delporte et al. (2007, 2008). Starting with GPS Week 1449, JPL started providing additional information on clock time bias and drift relative to the reference clock in the IGS network in their IGS reports, see Desai (2007). In their IGS reports, as a reference clock JPL uses exclusively IGS station USN3 (US Naval Observatory), or in some cases AMC2 (Colorado Springs). Besides CNES, all IGS Analysis Centers provide satellite clock parameters calculated using carrier-phase and pseudo-range measurements in order to support both time and frequency transfer at the same time. Thus, IGS clock parameters are more applicable to PPP (Precise Point Positioning) than to frequency transfer. This section describes the estimation of phase clocks and their application in frequency transfer and precise point positioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauch A, Achkar J, Bize S et al (2006) Comparison between frequency standards in Europe and the USA at the 10–15 uncertainty level. Metrologia 43:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/43/1/016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Schildknecht T et al (2005) Precise continuous time and frequency transfer using GPS carrier phase. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international frequency control symposium and exposition, pp 329–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Schildknecht T, Hugentobler U et al (2006) Continuous geodetic time-transfer analysis methods. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 53:1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2006.1665073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delporte J, Mercier F, Laurichesse D, Galy O (2007) Fixing integer ambiguities for GPS carrier phase time transfer. In: IEEE international frequency control symposium 2007/21st EFTF. pp 927–932

    Google Scholar 

  • Delporte J, Mercier F, Laurichesse D, Galy O (2008) GPS carrier-phase time transfer using single-difference integer ambiguity resolution. Int J Navig Obs. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/273785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai S (2007) [IGSREPORT-15607] Wk 1449 JPL analysis report. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/mail/igsreport/2007/msg00988.html

  • Kouba J (2004) Improved relativistic transformations in GPS. GPS Solutions 8:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-004-0102-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsakis D, Lee M, Dach R, et al (2006) GPS carrier phase analysis noise on the USNO-PTB baselines. In: International frequency control symposium and exposition, 2006. IEEE, pp 631–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier F, Laurichesse D (2007) Receiver/Payload hardware biases stability requirements for undifferenced widelane ambiguity blocking. In: 1st colloquium on scientifics and fundamental aspects of the galileo programme. Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Steigenberger P, Rothacher M, Dietrich R et al (2006) Reprocessing of a global GPS network. J Geophys Res 111:B05402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Švehla D, Rothacher M (2004a) Two years of CHAMP kinematic orbits for geosciences. European geosciences union, 1st general assembly, vol. 6. Nice, France, 25–30 Apr 2004. ISSN:1029–7006. (Geophysical Research Abstracts, European Geophysical Society)

    Google Scholar 

  • Švehla D, Rothacher M (2004b) Kinematic orbits for LEO satellites—a new product. In: Meindl M (ed) Proceedings from the IGS workshop 2004: celebrating a decade of the international GPS service—workshop and symposium. Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Švehla D, Rothacher M (2005) Kinematic positioning of LEO and GPS satellites and IGS stations on the ground. Adv Space Res 36:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Švehla D, Rothacher M (2006a) Impact of a LEO formation and a LEO/GPS dual constellation on the IGS products. In: IGS workshop 2006 perspectives and visions for 2010 and beyond. Darmstadt, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Švehla D, Rothacher M (2006b) Clock comparison based on the phase GPS satellite clock and synergy with the future ACES mission. In: European frequency and time forum EFTF2006. Braunschweig, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Švehla D, Heinze M, Gruber A, Rothacher M (2006a) Improvements in the reference frame determination using Galileo. REFAG 2006 conference DGFI, Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drazen Svehla .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Svehla, D. (2018). First Phase Clocks and Frequency Transfer. In: Geometrical Theory of Satellite Orbits and Gravity Field . Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76873-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics