Abstract
A designer’s ability to control and consider the “invisible aspects” of the project such as sound, primary, but also other invisible sensory aspects such as touch and scent, represents a real opportunity in product development and takes on an important role in user experience and product interaction. The sensory aspect measures perceived quality, a dynamic concept that varies in time as the consumer’s taste varies in a world that offers ever-new products. Moreover, in recent years, the expressive and sensory features of objects have been subjected to an improved interest: sensory and sensual features increasingly characterise products in different contexts (from packaging to the automotive sector). Some examples of case studies of interesting and meaningful sensory-designed projects developed in the last decades are presented. Sensory evaluations can be a strategic instrument for product innovation: for this reason, designers have to consider multiple sensory modalities during the design process that can be supported by several methods and tools (both quantitative and qualitative), designed in order to measure the consumer’s “quali-quantitative” perception of the sensory characteristics of different products. This chapter offers an overview of the main multisensory design tools and methods, derived from different disciplines such as design, graphics, wine and coffee tasting, medicine, marketing studies, etc., conceived or suitable for implementation in support of the sensory design project at every stage of the design process; the contribution presents methods and tools that can also help designers (and companies) to be predictive, in order to innovate.
This contribution was mostly developed by Dr. Beatrice Lerma, as the main author.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The concept is the basic idea behind the design; all the guidelines emerge from an analysis of the scenario. It represents the system of fundamental values to be followed in developing the design (the elements that give the product its identity). It may be defined as the crystallisation of an idea sparked off by studying a sphere of research and containing an element of innovation in the design (Lerma 2008).
- 2.
http://www.allaboutux.org/emoscope (Accessed 10 December 2017).
- 3.
“Using appropriate software, it is possible to define a histogram which represents the precise “physiognomy” of a smell, its identity: a sort of digital fingerprint”. (Gambaro 1996)
- 4.
soundobject.org/SDT/ (Accessed 10 December 2017).
References
Berendt JE (1988) The third ear—on listening to the world. Henry Holt, New York
Bochicchio F (2013) Educare al (buon) gusto. Tra sapore, piacere e sapere. Giapeto, Napoli
Bone PF, Jantrania S (1992) Olfaction as a cue for product quality. Mark Lett 3(3):289–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994136
Branzi A (1984) La casa calda. Esperienze del Nuovo Design Italiano. Idea Books, Milano
Carron M, Dubois F, Misdariis N, Talotte C, Susini P (2014) Designing sound identity: providing new communication tools for building brands “corporate sound”. In: Proceeding of the 9th audio mostly: a conference on interaction with sound, Aalborg, Denmark
Chalcraft E (2012) Tableware as sensorial stimuli by jinhyun jeon. Dezeen. www.dezeen.com/2012/11/18/tableware-as-sensorial-stimuli-cutlery-by-jinhyun-jeon. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
De Giorgi C (2014) Mattioli. Not-only-gold: sustainable innovation in jewellery. In: Ceppa C, Lerma B (eds) Towards conscious design. Research, environmental sustainability, local development. The intra-regional Alcotra–EDEN EcoDesign network project. Umberto Allemandi & C., Torino
Ferreri M, Scarzella P (2009) Oggetti sonori, la dimensione invisibile del design. Electa, Milano
Gallucci F (2005) Marketing emozionale. Egea, Milano
Gambaro F (1996) La fine del consumatore standard. StileIndustria 8:57–59
Germak C, De Giorgi C (2008) Design dell’esplorazione—exploring design. In: Germak C (ed) Man at the centre of the project: design for a new humanism. Umberto Allemandi & C., Torino
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston
Grandchamp R, Delorme A (2016) The brainarium: an interactive immersive tool for brain education, art, and neurotherapy. Comput Intell Neurosci 2016:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4204385
Hekkert HNJ, Schifferstein P (2008) Product experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Lasa G, Justel D, Retegi A (2015) Eyeface: a new multimethod tool to evaluate the perception of conceptual user experiences. Comput Hum Behav 52:359–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.015
Lasa G, Justel D, Gonzalez I, Iriarte I, Val E (2017) Next generation of tools for industry to evaluate the user emotional perception: the biometric-based multimethod tools. Des J 20:2771–2777. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352788
Laughlin Z, Howes P (2013) The sound and taste of materials. In: Karana E, Pedgley O, Rognoli V (eds) Materials experience: fundamentals of materials and design. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Laurans G, Desmet PMA (2017) Developing 14 animated characters for non-verbal self-report of categorical emotions. J Des Res 15(3-4):214–233. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2017.089903
Lemaitre G, Houix O, Visell Y, Franinović K, Misdariis N, Susini P (2009) Toward the design and evaluation of continuous sound in tangible interfaces: the Spinotron. Int J Hum Comput Stud 67(11):976–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/jijhcs200907002
Lerma B (2008) Concept (definition in glossary). In: Germak C (ed) Man at the centre of the project: design for a new humanism. Umberto Allemandi & C., Torino
Lerma B, Dal Palù D (2016) Material (and product) sensoriality: Can perceptive evaluations strengthen the meta-design phase? ELISAVA Themes de Disseny 32:10–23
Lerma B, De Giorgi C (2013) From exigential hypothesis to cognitive ergonomics: a discipline in support of sensory and sustainable design. In: Proceeding of CKSE13 international symposium on cognition/knowledge science and engineering, Orlando, Florida, USA
Lerma B, De Giorgi C, Allione C (2013) Design and materials. Sensory perception_sustainability_project. FrancoAngeli, Milano
Ludden GDS, Schifferstein HNJ (2009) Should Mary smell like biscuit? Investigating scents in product design. Int J Des 3(3):1–12
Maiocchi M (2015) The neuroscientific basis of successful design how emotions and perceptions matter. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, Berlin
Miller C (1991) Research reveals how marketers can win by a nose. Mark News 25(3):1–2
Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Oppedisano F (2014) I colori? Scappano sempre… Scritti sul colore in Italia fra gli anni settanta e novanta. AIS/Design Storia e Ricerche. http://www.aisdesign.org/aisd/tag/design-primario. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
Osgood CE (1952) The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychol Bull 49(3):197–237
Pagliarini E (2002) Valutazione sensoriale: aspetti teorici, pratici e metodologici. Hoepli, Milano
Pastorelli O (2003) Le parole del profumo. FrancoAngeli, Milano
Piccinelli E (2003) Il rumore del lusso. ItaliaImballagio 10:23. Edizioni Dativo, Milano
Piqueras-Fiszman B, Harrar V, Alcaide J, Spence C (2011) Does the weight of the dish influence our perception of food? Food Qual Prefer 22(8):753–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.05.009
Ricci C (1980) Il differenziale semantico: una proposta di revisione. Vita Pensiero, Milano
Rognoli V, Levi M (2011) Il senso dei materiali per il design. FrancoAngeli, Milano
Schifferstein HNJ (2011) Multisensory design. In: ACM Proceeding of the DESIRE’11 conference—creativity and innovation in design, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Schifferstein HNJ, Desmet PMA (2008) Tools facilitating multisensory product design. Des J 11(2):137–158. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630608X329226
Schifferstein HNJ, Spence C (2008) Multisensory product experience. In: Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (eds) product experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Spence C, Gallace A (2011) Multisensory design: reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychol Mark 28:267–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20392
Stone H, Sidel JL (1993) Sensory evaluation practices. Academic Press, San Diego
Warriner G, Sweetapple K (2017) Food futures: sensory explorations in food design. Promopress, Barcelona
Suggested References
Adams T (2016) Sound materials. A compendium of sound absorbing materials for architecture and design. Frame Publishers, Amsterdam
Haverkamp M (2013) Synesthetic design. Handbook for a multisensory approach. Birkhäuser Architecture, Basel
Lasa G, Justel D (2016) Nuevo modelo de evaluación de ideas conceptuales para productos y servicios basados en la experiencia de usuario. Dyna 91(1):25–28. https://doi.org/10.6036/7554
Lerma B, De Giorgi C (2011) The critical exploration of materials for the design project. A method of analysis below the levels of consciousness. Des Principles and Pract 6(5):81–92
Ludden GDS, Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (2008) Surprise as a design strategy. Des Issues 24(2):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.2.28
Ludden GDS, Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (2009) Visual-tactual incongruities in products as sources of surprise. Empirical Stud Arts 27(1):61–87. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.27.1.d
Lyon RH (2000) Product sound quality—from perception to design. J Acoust Soci Am 108(5):2471. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4743110
Piqueras-Fiszman B, Jaeger SR (2015) The effect of product-context appropriateness on emotion associations in evoked eating occasions. Food Qual Prefer 40(1):49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.08.008
Piqueras-Fiszman B, Alcaide J, Roura E, Spence C (2012) Is it the plate or is it the food? Assessing the influence of the color (black or white) and shape of the plate on the perception of the food placed on it. Food Qual Prefer 24:205–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.08.011
Rognoli V, Levi M (2009) Le neuroscienze per il design. La dimensione emotiva del progetto. FrancoAngeli, Milano
Schifferstein HNJ (2006) The relative importance of sensory modalities in product usage: A study of self-reports. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 121(1):41–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.004
Seo H, Hummel T (2011) Auditory-olfactory integration: congruent or pleasant sounds amplify odor pleasantness. Chem Senses 36(3):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjq129
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dal Palù, D., De Giorgi, C., Lerma, B., Buiatti, E. (2018). Multisensory Design: Case Studies, Tools and Methods to Support Designers. In: Frontiers of Sound in Design. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76870-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76870-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76869-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76870-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)