Abstract
Many renewable energy (RE) cooperatives undertake local RE projects such as solar photovoltaic generation and wind-power generation, particularly in Europe. In contrast, in Japan, municipalities have recently become actively involved in setting up a type of company that will undertake such projects. This type of company will be called “a municipal RE company” in this chapter. The purpose of this chapter is to examine the effectiveness of this particular organizational form. A literature review, website surveys and an interview are conducted. The findings are as follows: first, the literature review on RE cooperatives reveals that one of the crucial factors for successful RE cooperatives is community involvement in the projects. Second, community involvement may be facilitated and achieved by public employees through public service motivation. Third, website surveys and an interview with a key figure at a municipal RE company confirm this view. It is suggested that a municipal RE company works, to some extent, in the same way as an RE cooperative and thus may be effective in undertaking local RE projects. Taking into account that the success of an RE cooperative will depend on historical, cultural, and legal conditions, a municipal RE company may be a potential alternative for a community that does not satisfy those conditions.
Modified, with permission of Springer Nature, from Yamamoto, Y. (2018), Optimal organizational forms for local renewable energy projects. In: Sayigh A (ed.) Transition Towards 100% Renewable Energy: selected papers from the World Renewable Energy Congress WREC 2017, Chap. 42, Springer International Publishing, Cham. I would like to thank Springer Nature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Besley T, Ghatak M (2005) Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Am Econ Rev 95(3):616–636
Bomberg E, McEwen N (2012) Mobilizing community energy. Energy Policy 51:435–444
Bright L (2009) Why do public employees desire intrinsic nonmonetary opportunities? Public Pers Manag 38(3):15–37
DGRV (2014) Energy cooperatives: findings of survey conducted by the DGRV and its member associations, Spring 2014. DGRV (German Cooperative and Raiffeisen Confederation), Berlin
Francois P (2000) ‘Public service motivation’ as an argument for government provision. J Public Econ 78:275–299
Huang W-L, Feeney MK (2016) Citizen participation in local government decision making: the role of manager motivation. Rev Public Pers Adm 36(2):188–209
Huybrechts B, Mertens S (2014) The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy. Ann Public Coop Econ 85(2):193–212
ICA (2017) What is a co-operative. https://ica.coop/en/what-co-operative. Accessed 30 Nov 2017
Jensen PH, Stonecash RE (2005) Incentives and the efficiency of public sector-outsourcing contracts. J Econ Surv 19(5):767–787
Musall FD, Kuik O (2011) Local acceptance of renewable energy: a case study from southeast Germany. Energy Policy 39:3252–3260
Rainey HG, Steinbauer P (1999) Galloping elephants: developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. J Publ Adm Res Theor 9:1–32
Schreuer A, Weismeier-Sammerand D (2010) Energy cooperatives and local ownership in the field of renewable energy technologies: a literature review, RiCC-research report 2010/4, Vienna University of Economics and Businesses. https://www.wu.ac.at/fileadmin/wu/d/ri/ricc/Forschung/Laufende_Projekte/researchreport2010_4.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2017
Seyfang G, Park JJ, Smith A (2013) A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in UK. Energy Policy 61:977–989
Tarhan MD (2015) Renewable energy cooperatives: a review of demonstrated impacts and limitations. J Entrep Org Divers 4(1):104–120
Viardot E (2013) The role of cooperatives in overcoming the barriers to adoption of renewable energy. Energy Policy 63:756–764
Walker G (2008) What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? Energy Policy 36:4401–4405
Walker G, Devine-Wright P (2008) Community renewable energy: what should it mean? Energy Policy 36:497–500
Walker G, Devine-Wright P, Hunter S, High H, Evans B (2010) Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy 38:2655–2663
Warren CR, McFadyen M (2010) Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 27:204–213
Wirth S (2014) Communities matter: institutional preconditions for community renewable energy. Energy policy 70:236–246
Wright BE (2001) Public-sector work motivation: a review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. J Publ Adm Res Theor 11(4):559–586
Yamamoto Y (2016) The role of community energy in renewable energy use and development. Renew Energy Environ Sustain 1(18):1–4
Yildiz Ö (2014) Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation: the case of Germany. Renew Energy 68:677–685
Yildiz Ö, Rommel J, Debor S, Holstenkamp L, Mey F, Mükkerm JR, Radtke J, Rognli J (2015) Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Res Soc Sci 6:59–73
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yamamoto, Y. (2018). An Organizational Form for the Development of Renewable Energy. In: Feed-in Tariffs and the Economics of Renewable Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76864-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76864-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76863-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76864-9
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)