Siyashuta! Capturing Police Brutality on Mobile Phones in South Africa

Chapter

Abstract

Many poor Black South Africans are starting to find their voice by capturing events on mobile phone cameras, ubiquitous devices amongst all sectors of society. Citizens’ video journalism is providing visual evidence that cannot be mollified by political rhetoric, exposing injustices such as illegal corporal punishment at schools, gang rape and police violence. These mobile videos, through the platform of a tabloid newspaper’s Facebook page, function as catalysts that allow narratives of critique to emerge and grow through social media conversations.

Keywords

Mobile journalism South Africa Online videos 

Bibliography

  1. Banda, F. (2010). Citizen journalism & democracy in Africa: An exploratory study. Grahamstown, South Africa: Highway Africa.Google Scholar
  2. Bock, M. A. (2012). Citizen video journalists and authority in narrative: Reviving the role of the witness. Journalism, 13(5), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruce, D. (2002). Police brutality in South Africa. Inter-African Network for Human Rights and Development (Afronet).Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, S. (1989). Tuning into pavement radio. African Affairs, 88(352), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks (New ed.). London: Pluto-Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fiske, J. (2002). Television culture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, S. (2011). Whose freedom? South Africa’s press, middle-class bias and the threat of control. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 32(2), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gillwald, A., Moyo, M., & Stork, C. (2012). Understanding what is happening in ICT in South Africa: A supply- and demand-side analysis of the ICT sector (Policy Paper No. 7). Cape Town, South Africa: Research ICT Africa.Google Scholar
  9. Lievrouw, L., & Livingstone, S. (2006). The social shaping and consequences of ICTs. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs (pp. 15–30). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Mbembe, A. (2001). On the postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Richardson, I. (2010). Faces, interfaces, screens: Relational ontologies of framing, attention and distraction. Transformations, 18.Google Scholar
  12. Schleser, M. (2014). Connecting through mobile autobiographies: Self-reflexive mobile filmmaking, self-representation, and selfies. In Mobile media making in an age of smartphones (pp. 148–158). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. Snelson, C. L. (2016). Qualitative and mixed methods social media research: A review of the literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624574.
  14. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Steenveld, L., & Strelitz, L. (2010). Trash or popular journalism? The case of South Africa’s Daily Sun. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 11(5), 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Walton, M. (2014). Pavement internet: Mobile media economies and ecologies for young people in South Africa. In G. Goggin & L. Hjorth (Eds.), The routledge companion to mobile media (pp. 450–461). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Wasserman, H. (2013). Journalism in a new democracy: The ethics of listening. Communicatio, 39(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Journalism and Media StudiesRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations