Skip to main content

Women, Crime and Criminal Justice: Tales of Two Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women and the Criminal Justice System
  • 2124 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews positive developments since the publication of the Baroness Corston’s report, A Review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system, but also outlines some of the challenges to prompt concern and critical reflection. In the first tale we learn about positive strides in creating appropriate responses for women in conflict with the law. The second tale focuses on the shadows of criminal justice reform, and on the neglect of some groups of women such as ‘victim-offenders’, those who may have been humanly trafficked into the country, but then criminalised because of offences relating to legal status. The contrasting tales suggest that there is much more work to be done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annison, J., Brayford, J., & Deering, J. (Eds.). (2015). Women and criminal justice. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • A Prison Matron. (1862). Female life in prison by a prison matron [F. W. Robinson]. London: Hurst and Blackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaret, R. (2014). Women, crime and criminal justice. A global enquiry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, M., & Gelsthorpe, L. (2017). Feminist criminology: Inequalities, powerlessness, and justice. In A. Liebling, S. Maruna, & L. McCara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (2009). Short study on women offenders. Report conducted by social exclusion task force 2009. London: Cabinet Office and Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. (Ed.). (1989). Growing up good: Policing the behaviour of girls in Europe. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (1990). Alternatives to women’s imprisonment. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P., & Worrall, A. (2004). Analysing women’s imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinks. (2013). Run ragged. London: Clinks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinks. (2014). Who cares? Where next for women offender services? London: Clinks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corston, B. J. (2007). The Corston Report: A review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, J., & Spencer, J. (2003). Women behind bars: Explanations and implications. Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 42(2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C. (1859). A tale of two cities. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, N., Plugge, E., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2009). The impact of imprisonment on health—What do women prisoners say? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63(9), 749–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, H., & Matthews, R. (2011). Evaluation of the inspire women’s project. London: London South Bank University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, H., Silvestri, M., Evans, K., Matthews, R., & Walklate, S. (2010). Conditional cautions: Evaluation of the women’s specific condition pilot (Research Series 14/10). London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2011). Working with women offenders in the community: A view from England and Wales. In R. Sheehan, G. McIvor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Working with women offenders in the community. Devon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2017, July). The potential and pitfalls of problem-solving courts for women. Howard League for Penal Reform, Early Careers Academic Network Bulletin, (33), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L., & Morris, A. (2002). Women’s imprisonment in England and Wales. A penal paradox. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2(3), 277–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L., & Sharpe, G. (2015). Women and sentencing. In J. Roberts (Ed.), Exploring sentencing practice in England and Wales. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, S., Page, G., Lloyd, C., Templeton, L., Kougali, Z., McKeganey, N., et al. (2016). Establishing a ‘Corstonian’ continuous care package for drug using female prisoners: Linking drug recovery wings and women’s community services. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 16(5), 602–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardian Newspaper. (2016). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/aug/20/liz-truss-abandons-michael-gove-plan-for-problem-solving-courts (Accessed 1 October 2017).

  • Hales, E., & Gelsthorpe, L. (2012). The criminalisation of migrant women. University of Cambridge: Institute of Criminology. (Accessed 17 December 2017). ESRC Grant: 062–23-2348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C. (2004). Why are more women being sentenced to custody? In G. McIvor (Ed.), Women who offend. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C., & Gunby, C. (2011). Diverting women from custody: The importance of understanding sentencers’ perspectives. Probation Journal, 60(4), 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C., Gunby, C., & Shelton, N. (2011). What women want: The importance of qualitative approaches in evaluating work with women offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedderman, C., Palmer, E., Hollin, C., Gunby, C., Shelton, N., & Askari, M. (2008). Implementing services for women offenders and those ‘at risk’ of offending: Action research with together women (Research Series 12/08). London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidensohn, F. (1968). The deviance of women: A critique and an enquiry. British Journal of Sociology, 19(2), 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidensohn, F., & Silvestri, M. (2012). Gender and crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Prison Service. (2008). Women prisoners, prison service order number 4800. Available at: www.justice.gov.uk/offenders/types-of-offender/women. (Accessed 1 December 2017).

  • HM Inspectorate of Probation. (2011). Thematic inspection report: Equal but different? An inspection of alternatives to custody for women offenders. Manchester: HM Inspectorate of Probation. Available at: http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/probation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/03/womens-thematic-alternatives-to-custody-2011.pdf.

  • HM Inspectorate of Probation. (2016). A thematic inspection of the provision and quality of services in the community for women who offend. Manchester: HM Inspectorate of Probation. Available at: https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/09/A-thematic-inspection-of-the-provision-and-quality-of-services-in-the-community-for-women-who-offend.pdf.

  • Hollin, C., & Palmer, E. (2006). Criminogenic need and women offenders: A critique of the literature. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, K., & Brookman, F. (2010). An evaluation of the women’s turnaround project. NOMS Cymru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2004). Women’s Offending Reduction Programme (WORP) action plan. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2014). Review of the national referral mechanism for victims of human trafficking. London: Home Office. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/467434/review_of_the_National_Referral_Mechanism_for_victims_of_human_trafficking.pdf (Accessed 1 December 2017).

  • Home Office. (2017). An Evaluation of the national referral mechanism pilot. Research Report 94. N. Ellis, C. Cooper & S. Roe. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Justice Committee Justice—Thirteenth Report. Women offenders. Follow-up. (2015). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmjust/314/31407.htm.

  • Hutter, B., & Williams, G. (1981). Controlling women: The normal and the deviant. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe D., Hedderman C., Palmer E., & Hollin C. (2011). Re-offending analysis of women offenders referred to Together Women (TW) and the scope to divert from custody (Ministry of Justice Research Series 11/11). London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, N., Malloch, M., McIvor, G., & Gelsthorpe, L. (2006). Evaluation of the 218 centre. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lousley, G., & Cope, S. (2017). We are still here. The continued detention of women seeking asylum in Yarl’s Wood. London: Women for Refugee Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, E., Jones, L., & McVeigh, J. (2013). Evaluation of the Liverpool women’s turnaround project. Liverpool: Centre for Public Health, John Moore’s University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2015). Justice data lab reoffending analysis: Women’s centres throughout England. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2016). Statistics on women and the criminal justice system 2015. A Ministry of Justice publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2017). Offender management statistics quarterly July–September 2016. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2017, April). Justice data lab analysis: Re-offending behaviour after participation in the Brighton Women’s Centre Inspire Progamme.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS). (2012). A distinct approach: A guide for working with women offenders.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Offender Management Service (NOMS). (2015). Better outcomes for women offenders. London: NOMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, G. (2013). Risks, needs and emotional rewards: Complexity and crisis in the drug interventions programme. Unpublished PhD, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust. (2015, September 23). Prison reform trust response to HM Inspectorate of Probation’s call for evidence on work with women offenders. Available at http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Consultation%20responses/HMI%20Probation%20women%20offenders.pdf.

  • Prison Reform Trust. (2017). Why focus on reducing women’s imprisonment? Briefing. London: Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, P., & Hunter, G. (2016). ‘It was a safe place for me to be’: Accounts of attending women’s community service and moving beyond the offender identity. British Journal of Criminology, 56(5), 976–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R., & Fabiano, E. (1986). Female offenders: Correctional afterthoughts. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumgay, J. (2004). The Asha Centre: Report of an evaluation. Worcester: Asha Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. (2017). Consultation on proposals to strengthen the presumption against short periods of imprisonment: An analysis of responses. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2016/03/8624/3.

  • Sentencing Council. (2016). Imposition of community and custodial sentences. Definitive Guideline. London: Sentencing Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S. (2016). Review into the welfare in detention of vulnerable persons: A Report to the Home Office. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file490782/52532_Shaw_Review_Accessible/pdf (Accessed 1 December 2017).

  • Social Exclusion Unit. (2002). Reducing re-offending by ex-prisoners. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1976). Women, crime and criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1962). Women in prison. A study in penal methods. London: Stevens & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, R. (2017). Women and girls in penal institutions, including pre-trial detainees/remand prisoners. World Prison Brief. Birkbeck, University of London: Institute for Criminal Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women in Prison. (2017). Corston+10. The Corston report 10 years on. London: Women in Prison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women’s Policy Team. (2006). Women’s offending reduction programme: 2006 review of progress. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loraine Gelsthorpe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gelsthorpe, L. (2018). Women, Crime and Criminal Justice: Tales of Two Cities. In: Milne, E., Brennan, K., South, N., Turton, J. (eds) Women and the Criminal Justice System. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76774-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76774-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76773-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76774-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics