Advertisement

Introduction: New Dimensions in the Politics of Image and Aid

Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change book series (PSCSC)

Abstract

This interdisciplinary collection explores new dimensions in the politics of image and aid. The approach taken by this timely volume is to consider a variety of cases drawing upon a combination of theoretical and conceptual lenses that each in their own way combine a focus on aid with a focus on image. The cases in this volume consist of empirical contributions in regions as diverse as Kosovo, Korea, Mexico, Turkey, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sweden, Colombia, Russia, and China. They seek to explore foreign policy trends originating with some of the most powerful Northern donors in order to see how they are influencing patterns of national development. This introduction outlines some essential themes in the relationship between soft power, public diplomacy, development communication, and nation brands.

Keywords

Public Diplomacy (PD) Nation Branding USUnited States (US) United States Information Agency (USIA) socialSocial Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anholt, S. (1998). Nation-Brands of the Twenty-First Century. The Journal of Brand Management, 5(6), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronczyk, M. (2008). “Living the Brand”: Nationality, Globality and the Identity Strategies of Nation Branding Consultants. International Journal of Communication, 2, 41–65.Google Scholar
  4. Aronczyk, M. (2013). Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berridge, G. R. (2002). Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd-Barrett, O. (1977). Media Imperialism: Towards an International Framework for the Analysis of Media Systems. In J. Curran, M. Gurevitch, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Mass Communication and Society (pp. 116–135). London: Edward Arnold in Association with The Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd-Barrett, O. (2007). Cyberspace, Globalization and US Empire. In O. Boyd-Barrett (Ed.), Communications Media, Globalization and Empire (pp. 53–76). Eastleigh: John Libbey Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Browning, C. S. (2014). Nation Branding and Development: Poverty Panacea or Business as Usual. Journal of International Relations and Development.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comor, E., & Bean, H. (2012). America’s ‘Engagement’ Delusion: Critiquing a Public Diplomacy Consensus. International Communication Gazette, 74(3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cull, N. J. (2008). The Cold War and the United States Information Agency: American Propaganda and Public Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cull, N. J. (2009). Public Diplomacy before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. In N. Snow & P. M. Taylor (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (pp. 19–23). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Elwes, A. (1994). Nations for Sale. London: DBB Needham.Google Scholar
  14. Entman, R. M. (2004). Theorizing Mediated Public Diplomacy: The U.S. Case. Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(55), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayden, C. (2012). The Rhetoric of Soft Power: Public Diplomacy in Global Contexts. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hayden, C. (2013). Logics of Narrative and Networks in US Public Diplomacy: Communication Power and US Strategic Engagement. The Journal of International Communication, 19(2), 196–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayden, C. (2015). Scope, Mechanism, and Outcome: Arguing Soft Power in the Context of Public Diplomacy. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20, 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hocking, B. (2005). Rethinking the “New” Public Diplomacy. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations (pp. 28–43). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hocking, B. (2006). Multistakeholder Diplomacy: Forms, Functions, and Frustrations. In J. Kurbalija & V. Katrandjiev (Eds.), Multistakeholder Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 13–29). Malta and Geneva: DiploFoundation.Google Scholar
  21. Hocking, B., Melissen, J., Riordan, S., & Sharp, P. (2012). Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Google Scholar
  22. Jansen, S. C. (2008). Designer Nations: Neo-liberal Nation Branding—Brand Estonia. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 14(1), 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaneva, N. (2011a). Nation Branding: Toward an Agenda for Critical Research. International Journal of Communication, 5, 117–141.Google Scholar
  24. Kaneva, N. (2011b). Who Can Play This Game? The Rise of Nation Branding in Bulgaria, 2001–2005. In N. Kaneva (Ed.), Branding Post-communist Nations. Marketizing National Identities in the ‘New’ Europe (pp. 99–123). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kaneva, N. (Ed.). (2012). Branding Post-communist Nations: Marketizing National Identities in the ‘New’ Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Kaneva, N. (2015). Nation Branding and Commercial Nationalism: Notes for a Materialist Critique. In Z. Volcic & M. Andrejevic (Eds.), Commercial Nationalism: Selling the Nation and Nationalizing the Sell (pp. 175–193). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Kelley, J. R. (2010). The New Diplomacy: Evolution of a Revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 21(2), 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kennedy, L., & Lucas, S. (2005). Enduring Freedom: Public Diplomacy and U.S. Foreign Policy. American Quarterly, 57(2), 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  30. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign Affairs, 77(5), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leonard, M. (1997). Renewing Our Identity. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  32. Manheim, J. B. (1994). Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: The Evolution of Influence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mattelart, A. (1979). Multinational Corporations & the Control of Culture: The Ideological Apparatuses of Imperialism (M. Chanan, Trans.). Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mattelart, A. (2002). An Archaeology of the Global Era: Constructing a Belief. Media, Culture and Society, 24(5), 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Melissen, J. (Ed.). (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Hampshire, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  36. Neumann, I. B. (2013). Diplomatic Sites: A Critical Enquiry. London, UK: Hurst & Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nordenstreng, J. (1984). The Mass Media Declaration of UNESCO. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Google Scholar
  38. Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft Power. Foreign Policy, 80, 152–171.Google Scholar
  39. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  40. Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pamment, J. (2013). New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Pamment, J. (2014). The Mediatization of Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 9(3), 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pamment, J. (2015). Media Influence, Ontological Transformation & Social Change: Conceptual Overlaps Between Development Communication and Public Diplomacy. Communication Theory, 25(2), 188–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pamment, J. (Ed.). (2016a). Intersections Between Public Diplomacy & International Development: Case Studies in Converging Fields (USC Center on Public Diplomacy Perspectives Series). Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.Google Scholar
  45. Pamment, J. (2016b). The International Aid Transparency Initiative: Communication for Development or Public Diplomacy? In J. Pamment (Ed.), Intersections Between Public Diplomacy & International Development: Case Studies in Converging Fields (USC Center on Public Diplomacy Perspectives Series). Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pamment, J. (2016c). Toward a New Conditionality? The Convergence of International Development, Nation Brands & Soft Power in the British National Security Strategy. Journal of International Relations & Development, 1–16, Online first. Google Scholar
  47. Pamment, J. (2016d). British Public Diplomacy and Soft Power: Diplomatic Influence and Digital Disruption. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  48. Pamment, J., & Wilkins, K. G. (2016). Toward a ‘Common Standard’ for Aid Transparency: Discourses of Global Citizenship Surrounding the BRICS. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2989–3003.Google Scholar
  49. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schiller, H. I. [1969] 1992. Mass Communications & American Empire (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview. Google Scholar
  51. Schiller, H. I. (1976). Communication and Cultural Domination. New York: International Arts and Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sharp, P. (1999). For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations. International Studies Review, 1(1), 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ståhlberg, P., & Bolin, G. (2010). Between Community and Commodity: Nationalism and Nation Branding. In A. Roosvall & I. Salovaara-Moring (Eds.), Communicating the Nation. National Topographies of Global Media Landscapes (pp. 79–101). Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  54. Szondi, G. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy. Clingendael, Netherlands Institute of International Relations, The Hauge.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media & Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
  56. Thussu, D. K. (2013). Communicating India’s Soft Power: Buddha to Bollywood. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural Imperialism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tomlinson, J. (1997). Internationalism, Globalization and Cultural Imperialism. In K. Thompson (Ed.), Media and Cultural Regulation (pp. 117–162). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Tunstall, J. (1977). The Media Are American: Anglo-American Media in the World. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  60. van Elteren, M. (2003). U.S. Cultural Imperialism Today: Only a Chimera? SAIS Review, 23(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Ham, P. (2002). Branding Territory: Inside the Wonderful Worlds of PR and IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32(2), 249–269.Google Scholar
  62. van Ham, P. (2010). Social Power in International Politics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Volcic, Z., & Andrejevic, M. (2011). Nation Branding in the Era of Commercial Nationalism. International Journal of Communication, 5, 598–618.Google Scholar
  64. Wilkins, K. G. (2016). Communicating Gender and Advocating Accountability in Global Development. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilkins, K. G., & Mody, B. (2001). Reshaping Development Communication: Developing Communication and Communicating Development. Communication Theory, 11(4), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolff, J., & Spanger, H. J. (2015). The Interaction of Interests and Norms in International Democracy Promotion. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20(1), 80–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations