Skip to main content

“At Least We Don’t Have Trump”: Canadian Racism’s Systemic Character—A Countersystem Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Racial and Ethnic Relations

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

With a focus on how a (mostly) white Canadian elite play the primary role in creating and shaping inegalitarian, hierarchical, and unjust relationships among racial groups, the author uses U.S. sociologist Joe R. Feagin’s theory of systemic racism to provide insights into Canadian racism. Like Feagin in the U.S., the author demonstrates that in Canada racially oppressive conditions have regularly generated counter-framing that assertively resists the dominant white racial frame (WRF) and systemic racism. The author also provides illustrations of the recognition of racism’s systemic character at the highest levels of leadership in Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nyangweso (2017).

  2. 2.

    Ibid.

  3. 3.

    Feagin and Feagin (1978), Feagin and Vera (1995), Feagin (2010, 2014).

  4. 4.

    Aboriginal Peoples was the proper collective noun for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis for some time in Canada, even being widely adopted by national groups and the federal government. The distinction was even made legal in 1982 when the Constitution Act came into being in Canada. Recently, the federal Canadian government—under the leadership of Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau—adopted Indigenous Peoples and its legal ramifications. By recognizing First Nations, Inuit, and Metis as Indigenous Peoples, the Canadian government acknowledges their internationally legal right to offer or withhold consent to development under the U.N. Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which Canada endorsed with conditions under Trudeau’s predecessor, Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper. I use the term Indigenous Peoples whenever possible out of respect for Indigenous Peoples and the U.N. Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

  5. 5.

    Feagin (2014), p. 278.

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    Kirkup (2017).

  8. 8.

    Ibid.

  9. 9.

    In 2011, approximately 350,620 people lived on reserves in Canada, nearly all of whom claimed some form of “Aboriginal identity.” While reserves are governed by the Indian Act, residence on a reserve is governed by the Minister of Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada and band councils. For more, see Historica Canada (2017).

  10. 10.

    Galloway (2017).

  11. 11.

    Sam (2017).

  12. 12.

    Center for Research-Action on Race Relations (2017).

  13. 13.

    Ibid.

  14. 14.

    See Footnote 11.

  15. 15.

    1996 Royal Commission (2017).

  16. 16.

    Ibid; Otway (2002).

  17. 17.

    Feagin (2013).

  18. 18.

    Feagin (2010).

  19. 19.

    Driedger (2017).

  20. 20.

    Kohut (2017).

  21. 21.

    Annett (2017).

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Gates (2017).

  24. 24.

    Jones (2007).

  25. 25.

    Jane (1999).

  26. 26.

    Archives of Ontario (2017), Shadd (2017).

  27. 27.

    Fries-Britt (1998).

  28. 28.

    For other studies that show this is a tendency black students face, see Fries-Britt and Turner (2001), Smedley et al. (1993).

  29. 29.

    Rosenberg (2004), p. 260. Caps in original.

  30. 30.

    Boris (2007), p. 599.

  31. 31.

    Lewis (2007), pp. 24–28.

  32. 32.

    Collins (2005b).

  33. 33.

    Collins (1986, 1990, 2005a).

  34. 34.

    Collins, Black Sexual Politics; McGruder (2009).

  35. 35.

    Collins, Black Sexual Politics; Coad (2008), Rahimi and Liston (2009).

  36. 36.

    Breines (1992); For an interesting study concerning sexual politics, the sexual revolution, the portrayal of female sexual innocence in 1960s American film and changing female roles, see: Macpherson (2004), pp. 175–185.

  37. 37.

    For a discussion of the public humiliation black women face in public places, see: Feagin (1991), p. 101, 107.

  38. 38.

    Wentworth (1994).

  39. 39.

    Ibid.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberley Ducey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ducey, K. (2018). “At Least We Don’t Have Trump”: Canadian Racism’s Systemic Character—A Countersystem Perspective. In: Batur, P., Feagin, J. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Racial and Ethnic Relations. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76757-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76757-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76755-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76757-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics